UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Invitation Homes Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 5) 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 3) 

Filing Party:

 

     

 4) 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


 

LOGO

 

 

Notice of Annual Meeting

and

Proxy Statement

 

 

20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 24, 201818, 2021


 

LOGO

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Invitation Homes Inc., I invite you to attend our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at 10:4:00 a.m.p.m., local (Central)Central time, on Thursday,Tuesday, May 24, 2018, at our corporate headquarters, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. The Notice18, 2021. Due to the continuing public health impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, this year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting, conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting via a live audio webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. Further details about how to attend the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement that follow describesubmit questions, and information on the business we will conductto be conducted at the Annual Meeting.Meeting are included in the accompanying Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.

We welcome the opportunity to present youIn accordance with the information contained in thisSecurities and Exchange Commission rules allowing companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet, we have sent most of our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 23, 2021 a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 6, 2021. The notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and we hope that, afterAnnual Report and vote online. If you review it, you will vote (eitherwould like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials from us instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in person or by proxy)the notice, as well as in accordance with our Board of Directors’ recommendations. the attached Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important to usus. Whether you own a few shares or many, and our business.

We accomplished two great milestones in 2017, beginningwhether or not you plan to attend the year with our February 2017 initial public offering,Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. You may vote your shares on the second largest initial public offeringInternet, by telephone or by completing, signing and promptly returning a REIT generating $1.8 billion in gross proceeds, and endingproxy card, or you may vote via the year with our November 2017 merger with Starwood Waypoint Homes. Our vision is to be the premier choice in home leasing by continuously enhancing our residents’ living experience, and we made great strides in 2017. In addition, we are excited for our residents and stockholders to enjoy the benefits of our merger as we further integrate the two companies. We continue to believe there will be upsides as we discover and implement best practices in our business operations. We also believe our combined resources will enable us to continue making a significant contribution to economic growth, job creation, and the vitality of the local communities we serve. I am tremendously proud of what we accomplished in 2017, and we at Invitation Homes are excited for the future of the Company.

If you are voting by proxy, please submit your proxy as soon as possible to ensure your vote is recordedInternet at the Annual Meeting. You may submitEach of these options will ensure that your proxy by telephone, overshares will be represented and voted at the Internet or, if you have requested paper copies of our proxy materials by mail, by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the envelope provided.Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and employeesassociates of Invitation Homes Inc., we appreciate your continued support.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Frederick C. TuomiLOGO

Dallas B. Tanner

President and Chief Executive Officer

April 26, 20186, 2021


LOGO

Notice of 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

 

    DATE AND TIME:

    THURSDAY,TUESDAY, MAY 24, 201818, 2021

    10:4:00 a.m.p.m., local (Central)Central time

  

PLACE:VIRTUAL LOCATION:

INVITATION HOMES INC.

1717 Main Street

Dallas, Texas 75201You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. You will need your 16-Digit Control Number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to join the Annual Meeting.

 

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

 

1.

To elect the director nominees listed in the Proxy Statement.

 

2.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2021.

 

3.

To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

4.

To consider such other business as may properly come before the 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Proxy Statement following this Notice of Annual Meeting of Invitation Homes Inc., a Maryland corporation, describes these matters in detail. We have not received notice of any other proposals to be presented at the Annual Meeting.

RECORD DATE:

The Board of Directors of Invitation Homes Inc. established the close of business on April 3, 2018March 23, 2021 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.

VOTING BY PROXY:

Please authorizeTo ensure your proxy promptly by telephone,shares are voted, you may vote your shares over the Internet, by telephone or if you have requested paper copies of our proxy materials, by mail, by signing, dating and returning therequesting a proxy card in the envelope provided. Authorizing a proxy to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting will not prevent you from changing your vote in person if you choose to attend the meeting. Further, any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the Annual Meeting.complete, sign and return by mail. If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow their instructions to authorize your proxy.

By Order of the Board of Directors of Invitation Homes Inc.,

 

LOGO

Mark A. Solls

Executive Vice President,

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Dallas, Texas

April 26, 20186, 2021

This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement are first being distributed or made available, as the case may be, on or about April 26, 2018.6, 2021.

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 201818, 2021

 

 

The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Invitation Homes Inc.’s Annual Report are available free

of charge at www.proxyvote.com, a site that does not have “cookies” that identify visitors to the site.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

General Information

   1 

Why am I being provided withreceiving these materials?

   1 

What am I voting on?

   1 

Who is entitled to vote?

   1 

What constitutes a quorum?

   1 

What is a “broker non-vote”?

   12 

How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

   2 

How are votes counted?

   2 

Who will count the votes?

   2 

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

   2

How do I authorize a proxy to vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

23 

How do I vote my shares in person atwithout attending the Annual Meeting?

   3 

When and where will the meetingAnnual Meeting be held?

   3

How do I attend and vote my shares at the virtual Annual Meeting?

4

Will I be able to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting on the same basis I would be able to participate in a live annual meeting?

4

How can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?

4

What can I do if I need technical assistance during the virtual Annual Meeting?

5

If I can’t participate in the live Annual Meeting webcast, can I listen to it later?

5 

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

   3

Do I need a ticket to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

3

Do I also need to present identification to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

35 

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

   45 

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

   45 

Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors

   56

Introduction

6 

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 20182021

   58 

The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters

   1214 

Our Corporate Governance

   1214 

Director Independence and Independence Determinations

   1316 

Board Structure

   1316 

Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees

   1417 

Committee Charters and Director Nomination Process

21

Corporate Governance Guidelines

   15

Executive Sessions

1622 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

   1622

Executive Sessions

22

Communications with the Board

23 

Oversight of Risk Management

   1623 

Director Nomination ProcessSustainability Initiatives

   1625 

Communications with the BoardResponse to COVID-19

   19

Stock Ownership Policy

1929 

Compensation of Directors

   2031 

2020 Annual Director Compensation Program

   20

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

24

Executive Officers of the Company

2531 

Proposal No. 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   2733 

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

   2733 

Pre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   2734

Proposal No. 3—Non-Binding Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

35 

Report of the Audit Committee

   2936

Report of the Compensation and Management Development Committee

37 

Executive CompensationOfficers of the Company

   3038 

Emerging Growth Company StatusExecutive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   3040 

Introduction

   3040

Executive Summary

40

Strong Compensation Governance

43

2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

43

Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

43

Determination of Compensation

44

Other Matters

56 

Summary Compensation Table

   3058

2020 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

59 

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and 2020 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

   3160 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172020 Fiscal Year End

   4361

2020 Stock Vested Table

62 

Potential Benefits Uponupon a Termination or Change in Control

   4463

CEO Pay Ratio

67

Equity Compensation Plan Information

68 

Ownership of Securities

   4769 

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

   49

Transactions with Related Persons

49

Stockholders Agreement

49

Registration Rights Agreements

49

Indemnification Agreements

50

Loan to Former Director

50

Directed Share Program

50

Other Relationships

50

Related Person Transaction Policy

50

Stockholder Proposals for the 2019 Annual Meeting

51

Householding of Proxy Materials

51

Other Business

5171 

 

   i  20182021 Proxy Statement


Transactions with Related Persons

71

Registration Rights Agreement

71

Indemnification Agreements

71

Related Person Transaction Policy

71

Stockholder Proposals for the 2022 Annual Meeting

72

Company Documents

72

Householding of Proxy Materials

72

Other Business

73

ANNEX A: Non-GAAP Reconciliations

A-1

Reconciliation of Total Revenues to Same Store Total Revenues and Same Store Core Revenues, Full Year

A-1

2021 Proxy Statementii


 

  

 

LOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

April 26, 20186, 2021

GENERAL INFORMATION

Why am I being provided withreceiving these materials?

This Proxy Statement and related proxy materials are first being made available to stockholders of Invitation Homes Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Invitation Homes,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), on or about April 6, 2021, for use at our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday,Tuesday, May 24, 2018,18, 2021, at 10:4:00 a.m.p.m., local (Central)Central time, at 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201 and any adjournments or postponements thereof. This year’s Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You are invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. Proxies are being solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to give all stockholders of record at the close of business on April 3, 2018March 23, 2021 (the “Record Date”) an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201.

What am I voting on?

There are twothree proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:

 

Proposal 1:

 Election ofTo elect the director nominees listed in this Proxy Statement.

Proposal 2:

 Ratification ofTo ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2021.

Proposal 3:

To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

Who is entitled to vote?

Stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. As of the Record Date, there were 520,364,636 567,650,321shares of our common stock outstanding. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you as of the Record Date, including shares:

 

Held directly in your name as “stockholder of record” (also referred to as “registered stockholder”); and

 

Held for you in an account with a broker, bank or other nominee (shares held in “street name”). Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and instead must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares. Please refer to information from your broker, bank or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence in person or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who properly authorize a proxy but who instruct their proxy holder to abstain from voting on one or more matters are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by “brokernon-votes,” described below, alsothat are counted as present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be counted for purposes of determining a quorum.

12021 Proxy Statement


  General Information (continued)

What is a “brokernon-vote”?

A brokernon-vote occurs when shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee are not voted with respect to a proposal because (1) the broker, bank or other nominee has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares and (2) the broker, bank or other nominee lacks the authority to vote the shares at his/her discretion. Under current New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) interpretations that govern brokernon-votes, ProposalProposals 1 isand 3 are considered anon-discretionary matter,matters, and a broker, bank or other nominee will lack the authority to vote shares at his/her discretion on such proposals. Proposal 2 is considered a discretionary matter and a broker, bank or other nominee will be permitted to exercise his/her discretion. This means that, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on ProposalProposals 1 and 3 but willmay be voted on Proposal 2 in the discretion of your broker, bank or other nominee.

12018 Proxy Statement


  General Information(continued)

How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

With respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1), under our Bylaws, directors are elected by a plurality vote, which means that the director nominees with the greatest number of votes cast, even if less than a majority, will be elected. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Pursuant to the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into with affiliates of The Blackstone Group L.P. (collectively, “Blackstone”) described under “Transactions with Related Persons,” Blackstone has agreed to vote their shares of our common stock in favor of all persons nominated by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) to serve as our directors. As of the Record Date, Blackstone beneficially owned and had the right to vote approximately 42.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock and have advised us that they intend to vote all such shares in favor of the director nominees listed herein.

With respect to the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2), and the approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers (Proposal 3), under our Bylaws, approval of theeach proposal requires a majority of the votes cast.

How are votes counted?

With respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1), you may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” with respect to each nominee. Votes that are “withheld” will have the same effect as an abstention and will not count as a vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director, because directors are elected by plurality voting. Brokernon-votes will not affect the outcome of this proposal.

With respect to the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2), you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” For Proposal 2, abstentions will not affect the outcome of this proposal,proposal; however, as this proposal is considered a discretionary matter, brokers are permitted to exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on this proposal.

With respect to the approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers (Proposal 3), you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” For Proposal 3, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of this proposal.

If you sign and submit your proxy card without voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board with respect to the Proposalsproposals and in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the proxy with respect to any other matters that may be voted upon.

Who will count the votes?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.

2021 Proxy Statement2


General Information (continued)

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:shares as set forth below:

 

“FOR” each of the nominees for election as directors set forth in this Proxy Statement.

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.
Proposal 1:

To elect the director nominees listed in this Proxy Statement.

“FOR” each of the nominees for election as directors set forth in this Proxy Statement.

Our Board unanimously believes that all of the director nominees listed in this Proxy Statement have the requisite qualifications to provide effective oversight of the Company’s business and management.

Proposal 2:

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

Our Audit Committee and the Board believe that the retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021 is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

Proposal 3:

To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

“FOR” the approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

We are seeking a non-binding advisory vote to approve, and our Board recommends that you approve, the 2020 compensation paid to our named executive officers, which is described in the section of this Proxy Statement titled “Executive Compensation.”

How do I authorize a proxy to vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

Your vote is important and we encourage you to vote promptly. If you are a stockholder of record, you may authorize a proxy to vote on your behalf atshares in the Annual Meeting. Specifically, you may authorize a proxy:following ways:

By Internet—If you have Internet access, you may authorize your proxyvote by going towww.proxyvote.comand by following the instructions on how to complete an electronic proxy card. You will need the control number included on your proxy card in order to vote by Internet.

By Telephone—If you have access to a touch-tone telephone, you may authorize your proxyvote by dialing1-800-690-6903 and by following the recorded instructions. You will need the control number included on your proxy card in order to vote by telephone.

2018 Proxy Statement2


General Information(continued)

By Mail—You may authorize your proxyvote by mail by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card where indicated and by mailing or otherwise returning the card in the envelope that has been provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), indicate your name and title or capacity.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on May 23, 2018,17, 2021, and mailed proxy cards must be received no later than May 23, 2018.17, 2021.

When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?

Our Annual Meeting will be held at 4:00 p.m., Central time, on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, via live audio webcast, online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. For information on how to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, see “General Information—How do I attend and vote my shares at the virtual Annual Meeting.”

32021 Proxy Statement


  General Information (continued)

How do I attend and vote my shares in person at the virtual Annual Meeting?

First, you must satisfyOur Board of Directors considers the requirements for admissionappropriate format of the stockholder meeting on an annual basis. In light of the continuing public health concerns due to the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders and associates, this year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting, conducted via live audio webcast. Any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting (see below). Then, iflive online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. If you are a stockholder of record and prefer to vote your shares atvirtually attend the Annual Meeting, you must bring proof of identification along withcan vote your proof of ownership. You may vote shares held in street name atelectronically, and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, onlyby visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. A summary of the information you need to attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet is provided below:

Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021;

Assistance with questions regarding how to attend and participate via the Internet will be provided at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021 on the day of the Annual Meeting;

Stockholders may vote and submit questions while attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet (for information on how to ask questions during the virtual Annual Meeting, see “General Information—How can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?”); and

You will need your control number that is included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or if you obtainreceived a signedprinted copy of the proxy frommaterials, in your proxy card or the record holder (for example,instructions that accompanied your broker, bank or other nominee) giving youproxy materials in order to enter the rightAnnual Meeting and to vote during the shares.Annual Meeting.

Even ifWhether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we encourage you to vote in advance over the Internet, by Internet, telephone or mail so that your vote will be counted even if you later decidedo not to attendvote at the Annual Meeting.

When and where willWill I be able to participate in the meetingvirtual Annual Meeting on the same basis I would be held?able to participate in a live annual meeting?

OurAs noted above, due to the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, this year’s Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting. The online meeting format for the Annual Meeting will enable full and equal participation by all our stockholders from any place in the world at little to no cost.

Stockholders at the virtual-only meeting will have the same rights as at an in-person meeting, including the rights to vote and ask questions at the Annual Meeting. We believe that hosting a virtual meeting provides expanded access, improved communication and cost savings for our stockholders and the Company. You may vote during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions that will be available on 10:00 a.m., local (Central)the Annual Meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021 during the Annual Meeting.

In addition, the virtual format allows stockholders to ask questions of our Board or management during the live Q&A session of the Annual Meeting. At that time, we will answer questions as they come in, to the extent relevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, as time permits. In the event any pertinent questions cannot be answered during the Annual Meeting due to time constraints, such questions and management’s answers will be made publicly available on Thursday, May 24, 2018,our investor relations website promptly after the virtual Annual Meeting. If there are matters of individual concern to a stockholder and not of general concern to all stockholders, we provide an opportunity for stockholders to contact our investor relations department separately at (844) 456-INVH (4684) or ir@invitationhomes.com.

How can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?

If you wish to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into the Annual Meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” As noted above, we will answer questions as they come in, to the extent relevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, as time permits. Consistent with our corporate headquarters, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. prior annual meetings, we kindly ask stockholders not to ask more than one question to allow us to answer questions from as many stockholders as possible. Questions from multiple stockholders on the same topic or that are otherwise related may be grouped, summarized and answered together. Off-topic, personal or other inappropriate questions will not be answered.

To obtain directionsbe sure that all stockholders are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting, all of our Board members and executive officers are expected to join the Annual Meeting. If you

2021 Proxy Statement4


General Information (continued)

want to participate in our Annual Meeting, but cannot submit your question using the Annual Meeting website, please contact our investor relations department at (844) 456-INVH (4684) or ir@invitationhomes.com for accommodations.

What can I do if I need technical assistance during the virtual Annual Meeting?

If you encounter any difficulties accessing or participating in the Annual Meeting, please contact Investor Relationscall the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log-in page at844-456-INVH (4684) www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021. Technicians will be available to assist you.

If I can’t participate in the live Annual Meeting webcast, can I listen to it later?

The Annual Meeting will be recorded. A webcast playback will be available to the public at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021 within approximately 24 hours after the completion of the Annual Meeting. No one attending the Annual Meeting via the webcast or IR@InvitationHomes.com.telephone is permitted to use any audio recording device.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Yes. Whether you have authorized a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail, if you are a stockholder of record, you may change your voting instructions or revoke your proxy by:

 

sending a written statement to that effect to our Corporate Secretary at Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201, provided such statement is received no later than May 23, 2018;17, 2021;

 

authorizing a proxy again by Internet or telephone at a later time before the closing of those voting facilities at 11:59 p.m. on May 23, 2018;17, 2021;

 

submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date that is received by our Corporate Secretary at Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201, no later than May 23, 2018;17, 2021; or

 

attending the Annual Meeting revoking your proxy and voting in person.during the Annual Meeting.

If you hold shares in street name, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also change your votenominee, or revoke your proxy in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.

Do I need a ticket to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

You will need yourproof of identification along with either your proxy card or proof of stock ownership to enter the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held beneficiallyas otherwise provided in the name of ainstructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to be admitted to attend the Annual Meeting, you must present proof of your ownership of our stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement.

Do I also need to present identification to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

Yes, all stockholders must present a form of personal identification in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting.

32018 Proxy Statement


  General Information(continued)

No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.nominee.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters that may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers and other Company employeesassociates (for no additional compensation) in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Brokers, banks and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

 

520182021 Proxy Statement4


  

 

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

On November 16, 2017, we completed our merger (the “Merger”) with Starwood Waypoint Homes (“SWH”) and, in connection therewith, several directors then serving on our Board stepped down and, pursuant to the merger agreement, Richard D. Bronson, Michael D. Fascitelli, Jeffrey E. Kelter, Barry S. Sternlicht and Frederick C. Tuomi, each formerly a member of SWH’s Board of Directors, were appointed to serve on our Board.Introduction

At present, the number of directors that comprise our Board is set at 11 and, upon11. At the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, effective as of the Annual Meeting the Board set the number of directors that will comprise our Board at 10. Our Board has considered, and at the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, nominated each of the following nominees for aone-year term expiring at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20192022 (the “2019“2022 Annual Meeting”) or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifyqualifies or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal: Bryce Blair,Jana Cohen Barbe, Richard D. Bronson, Kenneth A. Caplan, Michael D. Fascitelli, Robert G. Harper, Jeffrey E. Kelter, Joseph D. Margolis, John B. Rhea, J. Heidi Roizen, Janice L. Sears, William J. Stein, Barry S. Sternlicht and Frederick C. Tuomi.Dallas B. Tanner. Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of these nominees. All 11 nominees other thanOn March 29, 2021, Mr. Caplan currently serve on the Board. On April 20, 2018, Mr. Jonathan D. Gray,Bryce Blair, a current member onand Chairperson of our Board, informed the BoardCompany that regrettably, due to his expanded role as President and Chief Operating Officer of Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., the general partner of Blackstone, he will be unable towould not stand for re-election to our Board when his current term expires at the Annual Meeting. The Board, upon recommendation of the NominatingWe are grateful to have benefited from Mr. Blair’s expertise, valuable business insights and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Kenneth A. Caplan, who previously served onstrong commitment to Invitation Homes and our Board following our initial public offering (the “IPO”) until the consummation of the Merger, as Mr. Gray’s successor.stockholders.

All of the nominees have indicated that they will be willing and able to serve as directors, but, if any of them should decline or be unable to act as a director, the individuals designated in the proxy cards as proxies will exercise the discretionary authority provided to vote for the election of such substitute nominee selected by our Board, unless the Board alternatively acts to reduce the size of the Board or maintain a vacancy on the Board in accordance with our Bylaws. The Board has no reason to believe that any such nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve.

We believe that our director nominees bring an extraordinary wealth of experience, skills and backgrounds to the Board. Our Board plays a key role in guiding the vision, mission and strategic direction of our Company. Their individual and collective expertise is essential to the execution of our long-term strategy and achievement of our vision of becoming the premier choice in home leasing. Learn more about each nominee to our Board under “—Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2021.”

Director Nominees’ Snapshot

   

Name and Primary Occupation

 Age  Director
Since
     Independent   
   

Michael D. Fascitelli*

Owner and Principal, MDF Capital LLC; Managing Partner, Imperial Companies; Board of Trustees Member, Vornado Realty Trust; Director, Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc.

  64   2017  Yes
   

Dallas B. Tanner

President and Chief Executive Officer, Invitation Homes

  40   2019  
   

Jana Cohen Barbe

Senior Partner, Dentons; Director, The Boler Company

  58   2018  Yes
   

Richard D. Bronson

Chief Executive Officer, The Bronson Companies, LLC; Lead Director, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.

  76   2017  Yes
   

Jeffrey E. Kelter

Founding Partner, KSH Capital; Chairman, Jack Creek Investment Corp.

  65   2017  Yes
   

Joseph D. Margolis

Chief Executive Officer, Extra Space Storage, Inc.

  60   2020  Yes
   

John B. Rhea

Partner, Centerview Partners; Director, State Street Corporation

  55   2015  Yes
   

J. Heidi Roizen

Partner, Threshold Ventures

  63   2020  Yes
   

Janice L. Sears

Managing Director, Western Region Head, Real Estate Investment Banking Group (Retired), Banc of America Securities; San Francisco Market President (Retired), Bank of America

  60   2017  Yes
   

William J. Stein

Senior Managing Director, The Blackstone Group L.P. (“Blackstone”)

  59   2012  Yes

*

Following the Annual Meeting, our Board plans to appoint Mr. Fascitelli as the Chairperson of the Board, subject to his election at the Annual Meeting.

2021 Proxy Statement6


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors (continued)

LOGO

LOGO

Director Nominees’ Collective Skills

Real Estate

Our real estate and single family rental industry expertise is core to our success. We benefit from directors sharing their experience in real estate development, operations and investments, and providing valuable guidance on real estate finance and capital markets.

LOGO

Investment

Our approach to investment and asset management requires a Board with expertise to provide sound oversight and guide our real estate finance and investment strategies.

LOGO

Operations

With our operations spanning a diverse mix of markets, suppliers, contractors and partners – we benefit from directors who have successfully led complex operations and can help us optimize our business model.

LOGO

Financial / Banking

As a fast growing company with a vast financial footprint, it is essential that we have directors with strong financial acumen and experience.

LOGO

Risk Management

Risk management experience is a vital perspective on our Board, enabling us to effectively monitor, manage and ultimately mitigate various forms of risk we face in our business.

LOGO

Corporate Governance / Regulatory

Substantive corporate governance and regulatory experience on our Board offers us insight into the best governance practices and the regulatory environment of the jurisdictions in which we operate and provides leadership in strategic implementation of diversity, sustainability and other aspects of corporate social responsibility.

LOGO

Strategic

Our dynamic operations require a Board with strong strategic insights gained through multi-faceted and challenging prior experiences.

LOGO

Active Executive / Robust Business Experience

As a fast growing company leading the single-family industry, we require a Board well-versed in navigating complexity and capitalizing on business opportunities to further our innovation and growth.

LOGO

72021 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors (continued)

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 20182021

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the term of service of each director nominee. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the director nominees is shown under “Ownership of Securities” below. The biographical description below for each nominee below includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion by the Board that such person should serve as a director.

 

BMRYCEICHAEL BD. FLAIRASCITELLI   

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Age:5964

 

Director since:September 2013

Mr. Blair has served as the Chairperson of our Board since November 2017 and, from January 2017 to November 2017 as our Executive Chairperson. Prior to our IPO, Mr. Blair served on the Boards of our predecessor entities, Invitation Homes L.P., Preeminent Holdings Inc., Invitation Homes 3 L.P., Invitation Homes 4 L.P., Invitation Homes 5 L.P. and Invitation Homes 6 L.P. (collectively, the “IH Holding Entities”) since September 2013 and as Executive Chairperson thereof since November 2014. Mr. Blair currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of PulteGroup, Inc. (NYSE: PHM), one of the largest home builders in the U.S. Additionally, he serves on the Board of Regency Centers Corp. (NYSE: REG), one of the largest owners of shopping centers in the U.S., where he chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Blair also currently serves on the Advisory Board of the MIT Center for Real Estate, the Advisory Board of the Boston College Center for Real Estate and Urban Action and the Advisory Board of Home Start, anon-profit focused on ending homelessness in the greater Boston area. Mr. Blair is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (“AvalonBay”) (NYSE: AVB), a real estate investment trust (“REIT”)

52018 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)

focused on the development, acquisition and management of multifamily apartments throughout the U.S., where he served as Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to 2012 and Chairman from 2002 through 2013. Prior to his role as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, he served as AvalonBay’s President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Senior Vice President of Development, Acquisitions and Construction. Prior to the formation of Avalon Properties in 1993, Mr. Blair was a Partner with Trammell Crow Residential. Mr. Blair also previously served as a Senior Advisor to McKinsey and Co. and as a part time faculty member at Boston College. Mr. Blair is the past Chairman of National Association of Real Estate Investment trusts (“Nareit”), where he also served on the Executive Committee and on the Board of Governors. He is a past member of the Urban Land Institute (“ULI”), where he served as a Trustee and was past chairman of the Multi-Family Council. Mr. Blair is a past member of the Young Presidents Organization and a former member of the World Presidents Organization.

Our Board considered Mr. Blair’s experience in real estate development and investment, including his having spent over 10 years as chairman and chief executive officer of a public real estate investment trust, experience managing day to day operations and preparation and review of complex financial reporting statements as chief executive officer of AvalonBay Communities, Inc., his experience as the Chairman of Nareit and his prior director positions.

FREDERICK C. TUOMI
LOGO

Age:63

Director since:November 2017

 

  

Mr. Tuomi has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director on our Board since November 2017, following our Merger with SWH. Mr. Tuomi served as SWH’s Chief Executive Officer from January 2016 until November 2017 and as a member of SWH’s Board from March 2017 to November 2017. Prior to his service at SWH, Mr. Tuomi served asCo-President of Colony American Homes, Inc. (“CAH”) from March 2015 and as and Chief Operating Officer from July 2013, each until SWH’s January 2016 merger with CAH. While at CAH, Mr. Tuomi was responsible for setting its strategic direction and leading the operations of its single-family rental operations including construction/renovations, marketing, leasing, property management, asset management, human resources and information technology. Prior to joining CAH, Mr. Tuomi was Executive Vice President and President—Property Management for Equity Residential, which he joined in 1994. He led the development of Equity Residential’s property management group through years of rapid growth and expansion to become the largest multifamily REIT in the U.S., while helping to pioneer its leading operational platform. Prior to Equity Residential, he was President of Residential Asset Management Group, a subsidiary of Post Properties. Throughout his career, he has served on numerous multifamily industry boards and executive committees, including the National Multi-Housing Council, California Housing Council, California Apartment Association and the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate. Since September 2014, Mr. Tuomi has also served as a director and on the Audit and Compensation Committees of Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC), a diversified real estate development and agribusiness company. Mr. Tuomi also currently serves on the Board and as Treasurer of the National Rental Home Council (“NRHC”).

Our Board considered Mr. Tuomi’s extensive familiarity with and thorough knowledge of our business and industry as a result of his over 30 years of experience in the real estate sector, serving in various senior and executive capacities, his vast public company experience as well as his service on the NRHC.

2018 Proxy Statement6


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)

RICHARD D. BRONSON
LOGO

Age:73

Director since:November 2017

Mr. BronsonFascitelli has served on our Board since November 2017. FromPrior to the merger (the “Merger”) with Starwood Waypoint Homes (“SWH”) in November 2017, from January 2016 to November 2017, Mr. BronsonFascitelli served on the Board of SWH and, from January 2014 to January 2016, served on the Board of Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust (“SWAY”), SWH’s predecessor. Mr. Bronson has been the Chief Executive Officer of The Bronson Companies, LLC, a real estate development company, since 2000 and has been involved in the development of several shopping centers and office buildings throughout the U.S. Mr. Bronson currently serves on the Board of Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: STWD) and was previously a director of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (NYSE: TPH) and Mirage Resorts Inc.. He also previously served as President of New City Development, an affiliate of Mirage Resorts Inc., where he oversaw many of the company’s new business initiatives and activities outside Nevada, and was Vice President of the International Council of Shopping Centers, an association representing 50,000 industry professionals in more than 80 countries. Mr. Bronson currently serves on the Board of the Neurosurgery Division at UCLA Medical Center and is a member of the Western Real Estate Business Editorial Board.

Our Board considered Mr. Bronson’s experience and knowledge in the real estate industry, which the Board believes provides us with valuable insight into potential investments and the current state of the real estate markets.

KENNETH A. CAPLAN
LOGO

Age:44

Director nominee

Mr. Caplan is a Senior Managing Director and the Global Co-Head of Blackstone’s real estate group. Prior to this, Mr. Caplan served as Global Chief Investment Officer of Blackstone’s real estate group and, prior to that, as Blackstone’s Head of Real Estate Europe. Before joining Blackstone in 1997, Mr. Caplan worked for Lazard Frères & Co. in the real estate banking group. Mr. Caplan currently serves on the Board of Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (NYSE: HGV) and on the Board of Trustees of Prep for Prep. Mr. Caplan previously served on our Board from January 2017 following our IPO until the consummation of the Merger in November 2017.

Our Board considered Mr. Caplan’s experience as Global Co-Head of Blackstone’s real estate group and, before that, as its Global Chief Investment Officer, which the Board believes will provide us with significant insight into the real estate industry. Additionally, the Board believes that Mr. Caplan’s specific experience in Europe will provide us with additional global experience and perspective.

72018 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)

MICHAEL D. FASCITELLI
LOGO

Age:61

Director since:November 2017

Mr. Fascitelli has served on our Board since November 2017. From January 2016 to November 2017, Mr. Fascitelli served on the Board of SWH and, from January 2014 to January 2016, served on the Board of SWAY. Since June 2013, Mr. Fascitelli has been the owner and principal of MDF Capital LLC, a private investment firm. Mr. Fascitelli is also a co-founder and a Managing Partner of Imperial Companies, a real estate investment and development company. Mr. Fascitelli has served as member of the Board of Trustees of Vornado Realty Trust (NYSE: VNO) since 1996. He served as the President of Vornado Realty Trust from 1996 to April 2013 and its Chief Executive Officer from May 2009 to April 2013. Mr. Fascitelli served as the President of Alexander’s Inc., a real estate investment trust and an affiliate of Vornado Realty Trust, from August 2000December 1996 to April 2013. Prior to joining Vornado Realty Trust in 1996, from December 1992 to December 1996, Mr. Fascitelli was a partner at Goldman Sachs & Co., an investment banking firm, in charge of its real estate practice.practice since 1992. Mr. Fascitelli also serves as a Co-Chairman of the board of directors of Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc. (NASDAQ: RADI), one of the largest international aggregators of rental streams underlying wireless sites through the acquisition and management of ground, tower, rooftop and in-building cell site leases, and as the chairman of the investment committee and a board member of Cadre,Quadro Partners Inc. (formerly Cadre), a real estate technology company. He serves as a board member of Child Mind Institute, The Rockefeller University, Urban Land Institute and University of Rhode Island.Island Foundation. Mr. Fascitelli is a former Commissioner of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and a past Chairman of the Wharton Real Estate Center where he served on the executive committee.

Our Board considered Mr. Fascitelli’s long and successful track record in various leadership roles including his executive experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado Realty Trust and his extensive knowledge of and experience in the real estate industry, which the Board believes provide us with valuable experience and insight.

 

ROBERT G. HARPER
LOGO

Age:40

Director since:January 2017

Mr. Harper has served on our Board since January 2017. Mr. Harper currently serves as the Head of U.S. Asset Management for Blackstone. Since joining Blackstone in 2002, Mr. Harper has been involved in analyzing Blackstone’s real estate equity and debt investments in all property types. Mr. Harper has previously served as Head of Europe for the Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies business and, prior to joining Blackstone, Mr. Harper worked for Morgan Stanley’s real estate private equity group.

Our Board considered Mr. Harper’s affiliation with Blackstone, significant experience in working with companies closely affiliated with private equity sponsors, particularly in the real estate industry, experience with real estate investing and extensive financial background.

20182021 Proxy Statement  8   


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)   

 

 

DALLAS B. TANNER

LOGO

Age: 40

Director since: January 2019

Mr. Tanner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and a Board member since January 2019. As a founding member of our business, Mr. Tanner has been at the forefront of creating the single-family rental industry. Since the founding of Invitation Homes in April 2012, he has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, and from August 2018 to January 2019 as Interim President. He served on the boards of holding entities that owned our business prior to our initial public offering (“IPO”) in February 2017 (the “IH Holding Entities”). Mr. Tanner has almost 20 years of real estate experience through the establishment of numerous real estate platforms. In 2005, he founded Treehouse Group, for which he privately sourced funds for platform investments, including single-family rental homes, multifamily properties, manufactured housing, residential land, bridge financing and property management. Mr. Tanner continues to be involved in Treehouse Group’s interest in Pathfinder Ventures, a Southwest-focused commercial real estate fund. In addition, he was a partner in a successful acquisition of First Scottsdale Bank of Arizona. Mr. Tanner served on the Maricopa County (Arizona) Flood Control Board and on the advisory board of First Scottsdale Bank. He is actively involved in American Indian Services and served as a missionary in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Our Board considered Mr. Tanner’s extensive hands-on experience in real estate investment, including the establishment of numerous real estate platforms, and as a founding member of our business, experience managing day-to-day operations of our Company and his prior executive positions. Mr. Tanner’s role as our President and CEO brings management perspective to Board deliberations and provides valuable information about the status of our day-to-day operations.

JANA COHEN BARBE

LOGO

Age: 58

Director since: November 2018

Ms. Barbe joined our Board in November 2018. Ms. Barbe is a senior partner at Dentons, the world’s largest law firm, where she has also served as the first Global Vice Chair from the U.S. Region and the former Chair of both the Financial Institutions and Real Estate Sectors. Ms. Barbe spent her career advising financial institutions and insurance companies on highly sophisticated tax advantaged and social investing. Ms. Barbe serves as a director of The Boler Company, a family office with operations across the globe in manufacturing, real estate and other holdings, including Hendrickson International, the world’s leading manufacturer and supplier of medium- and heavy-duty truck suspensions, axel systems and related components for global transportation industry. Ms. Barbe is also the Chief Executive Officer of Henley Farms, Inc., her family’s thoroughbred breeding business based in Lexington, Kentucky. An impassioned advocate for women, Ms. Barbe is the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of Catalyst, Inc. Equally committed to her community, Ms. Barbe is a past Chairman of the Board of Thresholds, Illinois’ oldest and largest provider of supportive affordable housing.

Our Board considered Ms. Barbe’s real estate and finance background, including chairing Dentons’ Real Estate Practice and Financial Institutions Sector, her expertise in transactional, operational and regulatory matters and strategic vision and her risk management experience, which are a complement to the skills and qualifications of our directors.

92021 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors (continued)

RICHARD D. BRONSON

LOGO

Age: 76

Director since: November 2017

Mr. Bronson has served on our Board since November 2017. Prior to the Merger, from January 2016 to November 2017, Mr. Bronson served on the Board of SWH and, from January 2014 to January 2016, served on the Board of SWAY. Mr. Bronson has been the Chief Executive Officer of The Bronson Companies, LLC, a real estate development company, since 2000 and has been involved in the development of several shopping centers and office buildings throughout the U.S. Mr. Bronson currently serves on the Board and as a Lead Director and the Chair of the Compensation Committee of the board of trustees of Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: STWD) and was previously a director of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (NYSE: TPH) and Mirage Resorts Inc. (NYSE:MRI). Additionally, he is currently on the board of directors of Starwood Real Estate Income Trust. He also previously served as President of New City Development, an affiliate of Mirage Resorts Inc., where he oversaw many of the company’s new business initiatives and activities outside Nevada, and was Vice President of the International Council of Shopping Centers, an association representing 50,000 industry professionals in more than 80 countries. Mr. Bronson currently serves on the Advisory Board of the Neurosurgery Department at UCLA Medical Center.

Our Board considered Mr. Bronson’s governance expertise, his corporate and board experience and knowledge in the real estate industry, which the Board believes provides us with valuable insight into potential investments and the current state of the real estate markets.

 

JEFFREY E. KELTER   

LOGO

 

Age:6366

 

Director since:November 2017

 

  

Mr. Kelter has served on our Board since November 2017. From January 2016 to November 2017, Mr. Kelter served on the Board of SWH and, from January 2014 to January 2016, served on the Board of SWAY. Mr. Kelter is the Chairman of Jack Creek Investment Corp., a special purposes acquisition company focused on the broader food and consumer products logistics and supply chain ecosystems value chain. Mr. Kelter is a founding partner of KSH Capital, which provides real estate entrepreneurs with capital and expertise to grow their platform.platforms. Prior to founding KSH Capital, Mr. Kelter was the founding partner and Chief Executive Officer of KTR Capital Partners, a private equity real estate investment and operating company focused on industrial properties throughout North America, until its May 2015 sale to Prologis, Inc. (NYSE: PLD). From 1997 to 2004, Mr. Kelter was President and Chief Executive Officer and served on the Board of Keystone Property Trust (“Keystone”), an industrial REIT.real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Mr. Kelter formerly served on the Board of Gramercy Property Trust (NYSE: GPT) from 2015 to 2018. Mr. Kelter founded the predecessor to Keystone in 1982, and took the company public in 1997, where he and the management team directed its operations until its sale in 2004. Prior to forming Keystone, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Square Properties, Inc., a real estate company which he founded in 1982. Mr. Kelter currently serves on the Board of Gramercy Property Trust (NYSE: GPT) and isas a trustee of the ULI,Urban Land Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Westminster School and Trinity College.

Our Board considered Mr. Kelter’s executivemanagement leadership and governance experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of Keystone and Penn Square and his extensive experience of over 20 years in commercial real estate.

 

2021 Proxy Statement10


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors (continued)

JOSEPH D. MARGOLIS

LOGO

Age: 60

Director since: May 2020

Mr. Margolis is the Chief Executive Officer of Extra Space Storage, Inc. (NYSE: EXR). He held this position since January 1, 2017. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Extra Space Storage, Inc. from July 2015 until December 31, 2016. Mr. Margolis served as a member of the board of directors of Extra Space Storage, Inc. from February 2005 until July 2015. From 2011 until July 2015, he was Senior Managing Director and Partner at Penzance Properties, a vertically integrated owner, operator and developer of office and other properties in the Washington, D.C. metro area. Previously, Mr. Margolis was a co-founding partner of Arsenal Real Estate Funds, a private real estate investment management firm, from 2004 through 2011. Before forming Arsenal in 2004, from 1992 to 2004, Mr. Margolis held senior positions at Prudential Real Estate Investors in portfolio management, capital markets and as General Counsel. Before that, Mr. Margolis worked for The Prudential Insurance Company of America as in-house real estate counsel from 1988 through 1992, and as a real estate associate at the law firm of Nutter, McClennen & Fish from 1986 through 1988.

Our Board considered Mr. Margolis’ extensive finance and real estate experience and senior executive experience in dealing with complex management, financial, risk assessment, business and governance issues, which enable him to provide us with business leadership and financial expertise.

JOHN B. RHEA   

LOGO

 

Age:5255

 

Director since:October 2015

 

  

Mr. Rhea has served on our Board since January 2017 and, prior to our IPO, from October 2015 to January 2017, served on the Boardsboards of the IH Holding Entities. Since September 2020, Mr. Rhea has been a partner at Centerview Partners, an independent investment banking advisory firm. In March 2021, Mr. Rhea was elected to the board of directors of State Street Corporation (NYSE:STT), one of the world’s leading providers of financial services to institutional investors, including investment servicing, investment management and investment research and trading. Mr. Rhea served as Senior Advisor and President, Corporate Finance & Capital Markets and Corporate Finance at Siebert CisnerosWilliams Shank & Co., LLC, a full-service investment banking firm, sincefrom June 2017.2017 to September 2020. Mr. Rhea is also Managing Partner of RHEAL Capital Management, LLC, a real estate development and investment firm he founded in March 2014, specializing in multifamily rentalaffordable and market rate housing, public private partnerships, andmixed-use projects. acquisition and repositioning of commercial real estate in urban communities. Mr. Rhea previously served as a Senior Advisor to The Boston Consulting Group, a worldwide management consulting firm from July 2014 to September 2017. From May 2009 to January 2014, Mr. Rhea was a senior appointee of Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York, where he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the New York City Housing Authority.Authority, the largest public housing authority in North America. Prior to his service with the Bloomberg Administration, Mr. Rhea was Managing Director andCo-Head of Consumer and Retail investment banking at Barclays Capital (and its predecessor firm Lehman Brothers) from May 2005 to April 2009. Previously, Mr. Rhea served as Managing Director at JPMorgan Chase & Co. from May 1997 to April 2005. Earlier in his career, Mr. Rhea worked at PepsiCo, Inc. and The Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Rhea has served on and chaired severalnon-profit boards and is currently a director of Wesleyan University, Red Cross Greater New York and University of Detroit Jesuit High School.

 

   911  20182021 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)

 

 

Our Board considered Mr. Rhea’s significant experience in our industry, including in development and regulation and his prior senior positions at real estate companies and regulatory bodies, including as Chairman and CEO of the New York City Housing Authority, and other companies. The Board also considered Mr. Rhea’s extensive experience in the investment banking industry.

J. HEIDI ROIZEN

LOGO

Age: 63

Director since: May 2020

Ms. Roizen has been a partner with leading venture capital firm Threshold Ventures (formerly DFJ Ventures) since 2012 and serves as a board director for privately held portfolio companies Planet, Zoox, Memphis Meats and Polarr. Ms. Roizen is also a member of the board of directors of DMGT, a public global media and information services company (LSE: DMGT). She also co-leads the Threshold Venture Fellows program in the Engineering Department at Stanford University and serves on the Advisory Council of Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Among her past activities, Ms. Roizen has been a partner at DFJ and Mobius Venture Capital from 1999 to 2006, and has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the National Venture Capital Association, where she served on the Executive Committee, chaired the annual conference and chaired the Public Outreach committee. She has served on numerous private and public company boards, including TiVo (NASDAQ: TIVO) and Great Plains Software (was NASDAQ: GPSI until it was acquired by Microsoft). Before becoming a venture capitalist, Ms. Roizen served as Vice President of World Wide Developer Relations for Apple. Ms. Roizen started her career as an early Silicon Valley pioneer, co-founding software company T/Maker in 1983 and serving as its CEO for over a decade until its acquisition by Deluxe Corporation (NYSE: DLX) in 1994. During that time, she also served on the Board of Directors and as president of the Software Publishers Association (now the Software Industry and Information Association—SIIA). Also active in nonprofit organizations, Ms. Roizen is a member of the Board of Advisors of the National Center for Women in Information Technology and of Springboard Enterprises. She is a past board member of the Stanford Alumni Association, where she served on its Trustee Nominating Committee for five years. Ms. Roizen is a frequent guest speaker at business schools across the country and is the subject of a popular HBS case about building business networks. In 2018, Ms. Roizen was named the “Financial Woman of the Year” by the Financial Women of San Francisco.

Our Board considered Ms. Roizen’s experience in entrepreneurial growth and business development and strong ability to assess risks relating to new ventures and investments, which bring business leadership, financial expertise and risk management skills to the Board. Mr. Roizen’ deep board experience also brings governance expertise to our Board.

2021 Proxy Statement12


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors (continued)

 

JANICE L. SEARS   

LOGO

 

Age:5760

 

Director since:January 2017

 

  

Ms. Sears has served on our Board since January 2017. Ms. Sears serves on the Board and is thepreviously served as independent director, Audit Committee ChairpersonChair of Essex Property Trust Inc. (NYSE: ESS), a fully integrated REIT, and as thewhich owns multi-family rental properties, independent director, Board ChairpersonChair of The Swig Company, LLC, a corporatean owner of large office properties, nationwide. From March 2014 to January 2016, Ms. Sears served as a Director and as theindependent director, Audit Committee ChairpersonChair of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.a life-sciences owner, sold to Blackstone Real Estate in 2016. She also served as independent director and from 1998Advisor to Helix RE, a real estate software startup. Prior to 2009, was aMs. Sears held the position of Managing Director, Western Region Head in the Real Estate Gaming & Lodging Investment Banking Group at Banc of America Securities where she was alsoSecurities. Concurrently, as the San Francisco Market President for Bank of America. From 1988 to 1998, Ms. Sears was Head of Client Management for Bank of America’s Commercial Real Estate Group in California, whereAmerica, she oversaw clientmanaged a senior leadership team, deepening relationships with REITs, homebuildersnonprofits and opportunity funds. From September 1982local governments. Prior to June 1988, Ms. Sears was a Real Estate Economist at both Chemical Bank and Citicorp in New York. Her professionalMs. Sears’ activities have included theG100, West Audit Committee Network, Nareit, ULI, NACD, WOB, and Athena Alliance.    She is a frequent speaker including at both Harvard and Columbia Business Schools. Ms. Sears was named ‘Forever Influential’ by SF Business Times and inducted into the National AssociationAllen Matkins Hall of Corporate Directors.Fame and gained annual recognition by Bisnow’s Bay Area Power Women, among other awards. Ms. Sears is active philanthropically both on boards and spending time in the past Presidentcommunity including with Compass Family Services, Meals on Wheels, tutoring at the Marina Middle School, and past Treasurer of the San Francisco Chapter of the National Charity League and most recently sat on the Boards of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, the San Francisco Economic Development Council and Leadership San Francisco. She acts as an advisor to the Audit Committee of the educationnon-profit San Francisco Art Institute.serving meals at St. Anthony’s.

Our Board considered Ms. Sears’ knowledge of capital markets and accounting methods and principles, as well as her extensive banking and financial background and experience working in the commercial real estate and REIT industry.

 

WILLIAM J. STEIN   

LOGO

 

Age:5659

 

Director since:October 2012

 

  

Mr. Stein has served on our Board since January 2017 and, prior to our IPO, from October 2012 to January 2017, served on the Boardsboards of the IH Holding Entities. Mr. Stein has been a Senior Managing Director of Blackstone since January 2006. Since joining Blackstone in 1997, Mr. Stein has been involved in the direct asset management and asset management oversight of Blackstone’s global real estate platform. Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Stein was a Vice President at Heitman Real Estate Advisors and JMB Realty Corp. Mr. Stein currently serves on the Board of Nevada Property 1 LLC (The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas), where he serves on the Audit Committee, and on the Board of BRE Select Hotels Corp (a voluntary filer with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).Edens Investment Trust. He previously served on the Board of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (NYSE: HLT), Extended Stay America, Inc. (NYSE: STAY), La Quinta Holdings Inc. (NYSE:LQ) and Brixmor Property Group Inc. (NYSE: BRX). Mr. Stein is a member of the University of Michigan Ross School of Business Advisory Board and the University of Michigan Real Estate Fund Advisory Board.

2018 Proxy Statement10


Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors(continued)

Our Board considered Mr. Stein’s tenure with Blackstone, his involvement in the direct asset management and asset management oversight of Blackstone’s global real estate platform, his extensive financial background and his experience as an asset manager focusing on real estate investments.

BARRY S. STERNLICHT
LOGO

Age:57

Director since:November 2017

Mr. Sternlicht has served on our Board since November 2017. From January 2016 to November 2017, Mr. Sternlicht served as one of the twoCo-Chairmen on SWH’s Board and, from 2012 to January 2016, served on the Board of SWAY. Mr. Sternlicht has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Starwood Capital Group, a private investment firm with a primary focus on global real estate, since its formation in 1991. During this time, Mr. Sternlicht has structured investment transactions with an asset value of more than $84 billion. From September 1997 to May 2005, Mr. Sternlicht was the Chairman of the Board of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE: HOT) until its acquisition by Marriott International, Inc. and its Chief Executive Officer from January 1999 to October 2004. Mr. Sternlicht has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: STWD) since its inception in 2009. From January 2013 to March 2017, Mr. Sternlicht served as Chairman of the Board of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (NYSE: TPH). Mr. Sternlicht is currently the Chairman of the Board of Baccarat, S.A. and serves on the Board of The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc. (NYSE: EL). From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Sternlicht served on the Board of Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RH) and is a former Trustee of Brown University on whose Board he served for 12 years. He also currently serves on the Boards of The Robin Hood Foundation, the Real Estate Roundtable, the Dreamland Film & Performing Arts Center and the Executive Advisory Board of Americans for the Arts. Mr. Sternlicht is a member of the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Foundation Trustee Council, the World Presidents Organization and the ULI.

Our Board considered Mr. Sternlicht’s extensive experience in both the real estate markets and as a senior executive and director of other publicly traded companies, which the Board believes enables him to provide us with leadership and financial expertise as well as insight into the current status of the global financial markets.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

 

   1113  20182021 Proxy Statement


    

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Our Corporate Governance

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of our Board, as provided by Maryland law, and the Company conducts its business through meetings of the Board and its four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Development Committee, (the “Compensation Committee”), the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Investment and Finance Committee.

We have structured ourare committed to exercising and maintaining strong corporate governance in a manner wepractices. We believe closely aligns ourthat good governance promotes the long-term interests with those of our stockholders.stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and improves our standing as a trusted member of the communities we serve. Notable features of our corporate governance include:are set forth below.

Corporate Governance Snapshot

Number of Independent Director Nominees Standing for Election

9

Total Number of Director Nominees

10

Average Age of Director Nominees Standing for Election

60

Average Tenure of Directors Standing for Election (years)

3.8

Chairperson Position Separate from President and CEO

Yes

Annual Election of All Directors

Yes

Stockholder Rights Plan

No

Limits on the Number of Directorships Held by Directors

Yes

Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

Yes

New Director Orientation

Yes

Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations

Yes

Annual Review of Management Succession Plans

Yes

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Yes

Policies and Practices to Align Executive Compensation with Long-Term Stockholder Interests

Yes

Stock Ownership Requirements for Executive Officers

Yes

Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors

Yes

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

Yes

Clawback Policy (Long-Term Incentive Awards)

Yes

Stockholder Rights and Accountability

 

our

Our Board is not classified wherebyand each of our directors is subject to annual reelection and we(we will not classify our Board in the future without the approval of our stockholders;stockholders);

 

our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without

Stockholders holding at least 10% of outstanding shares have the presence of our corporate officers ornon-independent directors;right to call special meetings;

 

we have opted out of the Maryland business combination and control share acquisition statutes and cannot opt in without stockholder approval;

our directors and executive officers are subject to stock ownership and retention requirements;

our directors are not expected to serve after reaching age 75;

we intend that no director serve more than 15 years on our Board;

stockholdersStockholders holding a majority of outstanding shares have the right to amend, alter or repeal our Bylaws, or adopt new Bylaws, at a duly called meeting of stockholders;Bylaws;

 

our stockholders

Stockholders may act onby written consent;

 

2021 Proxy Statement14


we

The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

We do not have a stockholder rights plan, and we will not adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without stockholder approval; and

 

we

We have instituted a rangeopted out of otherthe Maryland business combination and control share acquisition statutes and cannot opt in without stockholder approval; and

We actively engage with our stockholders, seek input, address questions and concerns, and provide perspective on Company policies and practices through our direct outreach to investors, our annual meetings of stockholders and regular detailed investor presentations.

Board Practices

A substantial majority of our directors (90% of our director nominees) are independent;

Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed entirely of independent directors;

Our Board is led by our Chairperson, and the Chairperson position is separate from our President and CEO;

Our Board is committed to diversity, and 40% of our director nominees represent gender and ethnically diverse populations;

We conduct annual Board and committee evaluations;

Generally, our directors are not expected to serve after reaching age 75;

We intend that no director serve more than 15 years on our Board, and director nominees’ average tenure is 3.8 years;

Our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate governance best practices, includingofficers or non-independent directors;

We have instituted limits on the number of directorships held by our directors to prevent “overboarding,” a“overboarding”;

We provide robust director orientation and continuing education program, rotation of committee members, regularprograms;

The Board and committee evaluations and a commitmentis committed to Board refreshment, and diversity.

The stockholders agreement described under “Transactions with Related Persons—Stockholders Agreement” provides that Blackstone has the right to nominate directors to serve on our Board based on its percentage ownershipfour of our common stock. Currently, Blackstone has10 director nominees joined the rightBoard since the beginning of 2018;

The Board regularly rotates committee members; and

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to nominate threemembers of the Board.

Robust Stock Ownership Requirements

Our directors and it has designated Messrs. Caplan, Harperexecutive officers are subject to stock ownership and Stein, each of whom are employed by Blackstone. The provisions of the stockholders agreement regarding the nomination of directors will remain in effect until Blackstone is no longer entitled to nominate a director to ourretention requirements:

President and CEO: 6X base salary;

Executive officers: 3X base salary; and

Non-employee directors: 5X annual cash retainer for Board unless Blackstone requests terminating such rights at an earlier date.service.

Following our February 2017 IPO until we completed the Merger with SWH in November 2017, we were a “controlled company” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSESee “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and accordingly, were exempt from certain of NYSE’s governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of our Board consist of independent directors and that we have a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee each composed entirely of independent directors. Notwithstanding this “controlled company” status, since our IPO, we have had a fully independent Audit Committee, and we currently have a fully independent Compensation Committee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of four members, three of whom have been determined independent, and we will have a fully independent Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee within the transition period permitted under the NYSE rules after a company ceases to qualify as a “controlled company.”Analysis—Other Matters—Stock Ownership Policy” for more details.

 

1520182021 Proxy Statement12


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

 

 

Director Independence and Independence Determinations

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that, in addition to not havehaving a disqualifying relationship, as set forth in the NYSE rules, he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries which, in the opinion of the Board would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines define independence in accordance with the independence definition in the current NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to review the independence of all directors at least annually. In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the objective tests set forth in the NYSE independence definition, the Board will determine, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, whether such relationship is material and whether such relationship would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee undertook reviews of director independence during 2017, both in connection with the Company’s IPO and in connection with the Merger when directors then serving on SWH’s Board joined our Board, and made recommendations to our Board as to those directors meeting the requisite NYSE independence standards applicable to serve on the Board and any heightened standards to serve on a committee of the Board. As a result of these reviews, the Board has affirmatively determined that each of Jana Cohen Barbe, Bryce Blair, Richard D. Bronson, Kenneth A. Caplan, Michael D. Fascitelli, Robert G. Harper, Jeffrey E. Kelter, Joseph. D. Margolis, John B. Rhea, J. Heidi Roizen, Janice L. Sears and William J. Stein and Barry S. Sternlicht is independent under all applicable NYSE standards for Board service and under our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the Board previously determined that Kenneth A. Caplan, Robert G. Harper and Barry S. Sternlicht, who served on our Board for a portion of 2020 but were not nominated for re-election at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, were independent under all applicable NYSE independence standards for Board service and under our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

At the committee level, the Board has affirmatively determined that each of Richard D. Bronson, Jeffrey E. Kelter, John B. Rhea and Janice L. Sears, asthe current members of the Audit Committee (Jana Cohen Barbe, J. Heidi Roizen, Janice L. Sears and William J. Stein) is “independent” for purposes of Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and that each of the current members of the Compensation and Management Development Committee (Jana Cohen Barbe, Michael D. Fascitelli, Jeffrey E. Kelter, Joseph D. Margolis and John B. Rhea and William J. Stein, as membersRhea) is “independent” for purposes of Section 10C(b) of the Exchange Act. The Board has also affirmatively determined that each of Richard D. Bronson and Janice L. Sears, whom the Board plans to appoint to the Compensation and Management Development Committee following the Annual Meeting, is “independent” for purposes of Section 10C(b) of the Exchange Act.

In making its independence determinations, the Board considered and reviewed all information known to it, including information identified through several directors’ questionnaires.

Board Structure

Our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws provide that our Board will consist of such number of directors as may from time to time be fixed by the Board, but may not be more than 15 or fewer than the minimum number permitted by Maryland law, which is one.

Our Board is led by our Chairperson, and the Chairperson position is separate from our President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO position. We believe that the separation of the Chairperson and Chief Executive OfficerPresident and CEO positions is appropriate corporate governance for us at this time. Accordingly, Mr. Blair serves as Chairperson, while Mr. TuomiTanner serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer.CEO. Following the Annual Meeting, our Board plans to appoint Mr. Fascitelli as the Chairperson of the Board, subject to his election at the Annual Meeting, and Mr. Tanner will continue to serve as our President and CEO. Our Board believes that this structure best encourages the free and open dialogue of competing views and provides for strong checks and balances. Additionally, our Chairperson’s attention to Board and committee matters allows the President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO to focus more specifically on overseeing the Company’sday-to-day operations, as well as strategic opportunities and planning.

 

2021 Proxy Statement  1316  2018 Proxy Statement


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

 

 

Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees

Our Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Management Development Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and an Investment and Finance Committee. The following table summarizesprovides the current membership of each of the Board’sstanding Board committees.

 

Director

 Audit Committee          

Compensation and     

Management          

Development         

Committee         

 

Nominating and         

Corporate Governance         

Committee         

 

Investment and         

Finance Committee         

Bryce Blair*

   
  Bryce Blair* Member 

 

 

Frederick C. Tuomi

   
  Dallas B. Tanner

Member          
   
  Jana Cohen BarbeMember          Member          

 

Richard D. Bronson

 

Member          Member          
  Michael D. Fascitelli

Member          

Chairperson          
  Jeffrey E. Kelter

Member          Member          

  Joseph D. Margolis

Member          

Member          
  John B. Rhea

Chairperson          Member          

  J. Heidi RoizenMember          

Member          

  Janice L. SearsChairperson          

Member          
  William J. Stein Member          

 

  Member          

Michael D. Fascitelli

Member          

Chairperson          

Jonathan D. Gray

Robert G. Harper

Member          

Member          

Jeffrey E. Kelter

Member          

Member          

John B. Rhea

Member          

 

 Chairperson          

  

 

Janice L. Sears

Chairperson          

Member          

William J. Stein

Member          

Chairperson          

Barry S. Sternlicht

 

*

Chairperson of the Board (Mr. Blair informed the Company that he would not stand for re-election to our Board at the Annual Meeting).

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Board held 13 meetings, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Compensation and Management Development Committee held eight meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings and the Investment and Finance Committee held five meetings. In 2020, each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he or she served as a member during the time in which he or she served as a member of the Board or such committees. All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and our annual meeting of stockholders. DuringWe expect all directors to attend any meeting of stockholders, and all of our directors attended the year ended December 31, 2017, the Board held 10 meetings, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Compensation Committee held six meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting and the Investment and Finance Committee held three meetings. In 2017, each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served as a member. We did not hold an2020 annual meeting of stockholders in 2017.stockholders.

172021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

Audit Committee

Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined to be “independent” in accordance with our Audit Committee charter and applicable NYSE and Exchange Act rules applicable to boards of directors generally and audit committees in particular. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the NYSE rules and that each of Mr. Rhea and Ms. Sears qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules.

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

assisting the Board with its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process and financial statement audits;

assisting the Board with its oversight of our disclosure controls procedures and our internal control over financial reporting;

assessing the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence;

engaging the independent registered public accounting firm;

overseeing the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm;

assisting with our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing; and

overseeing our exposure to risks facing the Company, including, but not limited to, financial risks, information technology risks, tax risks, legal risks and enterprise risks.

Chair:

    Ms. Sears

Additional Committee Members:

    Ms. Barbe

    Ms. Roizen

    Mr. Stein

•  All members are “independent” in accordance with our Audit Committee charter and the applicable NYSE and Exchange Act rules

•  All members are financially literate within the meaning of the NYSE rules

•  Ms. Sears, Ms. Roizen and Mr. Stein qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)

•  Governed by a Board-approved charter

Primary Responsibilities:

•  assisting the Board with its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process and financial statement audits;

•    assisting the Board with its oversight of our disclosure controls procedures and our internal control over financial reporting;

•  assessing the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence;

•  engaging the independent registered public accounting firm;

•  overseeing the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm;

•  assisting with our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing; and

•  overseeing our enterprise risk management program, covering exposure to risks facing the Company, including, but not limited to, financial, tax, legal and enterprise risks, and technology and information security risks, including cybersecurity, data privacy, business continuity and disaster recovery.

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. See “Proposal 2—Pre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” The Audit Committee also has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received by the Company regarding its accounting, internal controls and auditing matters.

The Audit Committee charter is available on our website at: www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”—“Audit Committee Charter.”

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  1418   


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)   

 

 

Compensation and Management Development Committee

Each member of the Compensation Committee has been determined to be “independent” in accordance with our Compensation and Management Development Committee charter and the applicable NYSE and Exchange Act rules applicable to boards of directors generally and compensation committees in particular.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

establishing and reviewing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy;

overseeing the goals, objectives and compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, including evaluating the performance of the President and Chief Executive Officer in light of those goals;

reviewing and determining the salaries, performance-based incentives, and other matters related to the compensation of our other executive officers;

making recommendations to the Board regarding director compensation;

approving our benefit and other compensation plans and setting the terms of and making awards thereunder; and

assisting with our compliance with the compensation rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by the NYSE, the SEC and other law, as applicable.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

A majority of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been determined to be “independent,”

Chair:

    Mr. Rhea

Additional Committee Members:

    Ms. Barbe

    Mr. Fascitelli

    Mr. Kelter

    Mr. Margolis

•  All members are “independent” in accordance with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and the applicable NYSE rules. As described above, we were a “controlled company” under the NYSE rules until the November 2017 Merger. We are permitted under a transition period under the NYSE rules to have a fully independent Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee within one year after ceasing to be a “controlled company.”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

developing a set of governance principles applicable to the Company and overseeing the Company’s governance policies;

identifying, reviewing, assessing and making recommendations to the Board as to candidates to serve on the Board and its committees;

considering matters related to director independence and conflicts of interest;

recommending those to serve as committee chairpersons; and

overseeing the annual evaluation of the Board and management.

Investment and Finance Committee

The Board has established an Investment and Finance Committee composed solely of members of the Board. The Investment and Finance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

overseeing matters related to the Company’s investments in real estate assets proposed by management;

overseeing the performance of the Company’s assets;

reviewing the Company’s investment and disposition policies, procedures, strategies and programs; and

reviewing the Company’s capital raising and other financing activities.

Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe our Board’s views and policies on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed periodically by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by our Compensation and Management Development Committee charter and the applicable NYSE and Exchange Act rules

•  Governed by a Board-approved charter

Primary Responsibilities:

•  establishing and reviewing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy;

•  overseeing the goals, objectives and compensation of our President and CEO, including evaluating the performance of the President and CEO in light of those goals;

•    reviewing and determining the salaries, performance-based incentives, and other matters related to the compensation of our other executive officers;

•  making recommendations to the Board regarding director compensation;

•    approving our incentive and equity compensation plans and setting the terms of and making awards thereunder;

•    assisting the Board in review and consideration of succession plans for our officers, and establishing and evaluating plans and programs for management development; and

•   assisting with our compliance with the compensation rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by the NYSE, the SEC and other laws, as applicable.

For a description of our process for determining compensation, including the role of the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s independent compensation consultant, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

The Compensation and Management Development Committee charter is available on our website at: www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”—“Compensation and Management Development Committee Charter.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. During 2020, our Compensation and Management Development Committee was composed of Mr. Rhea, Ms. Barbe, Mr. Fascitelli, Mr. Kelter and Mr. Margolis. During 2020 and as of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity whose executive officers served on our Compensation and Management Development Committee or Board.

 

   1519  20182021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

 

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Audit Committee charter, Compensation Committee charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, Investment, Finance Committee charter, and other corporate governance information are available on our website at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary of Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201.

Executive Sessions

Chair:

    Mr. Stein

Additional Committee Members:

    Mr. Bronson

    Mr. Kelter

    Mr. Rhea

    Ms. Roizen

•  All members are “independent” in accordance with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and the applicable NYSE rules

•  Governed by a Board-approved charter

Primary Responsibilities:

•    developing a set of governance principles applicable to the Company and overseeing the Company’s governance policies;

•    identifying, reviewing, assessing and making recommendations to the Board as to candidates to serve on the Board and its committees;

•  considering matters related to director independence and conflicts of interest;

•  recommending those to serve as committee chairpersons;

•  overseeing the annual evaluation of the Board and management; and

•   providing oversight with respect to the Company’s environmental, social and related governance (“ESG”) strategy, initiatives and policies.

Executive sessions, which are meetings of thenon-management members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and directors who have not been determined independent. At each of these meetings, thenon-management and independent directors in attendance, as applicable, will determine which member will preside at such session.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions and is posted on our website at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”. Our Code of Conduct sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, use of our assets and business conduct and fair dealing. Our Code of Conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined by Item 406 of RegulationS-K promulgated by the SEC. We intend to make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of our Code of Conduct on our website rather than by filing a Form8-K and within the time period required under applicable rules and regulations.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has overall responsibility in the oversight of risk management related to the Company and its business. A fundamental part of risk oversight is not only understanding the material risks a company faces and the steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. The Board is supported in its risk oversight function by its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Investment and Finance Committee. Each of these committees regularly meets with and reports to the Board. In addition, members of the Board also regularly meet with members of management and other key personnel who advise the Board on areas of enterprise risk, the Company’s policies and practices in overseeing these risks, the Company’s mitigation and response strategies and any incidents that have arisen.

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its risk oversight responsibilities by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, the surveillance of administrative and financial controls, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, risk related to information security and system disruption and our enterprise risk management program. Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal and internal audit functions, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of our business and summarizes for the Board all areas of risk and the appropriate mitigating factors. The Compensation Committee assists the Board by overseeing and evaluating risks related to the Company’s compensation structure and compensation programs, including the formulation, administration and regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also considers, and discusses with management, whether any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and evaluates programs and risks associated with Board and Board committee membership and structure, succession planning and corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is available on our website at: www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”—“Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.”

Investment and Finance Committee focuses on financial risks associated with the Company’s cash management, investment and financing policies and practices, asset portfolio and potential acquisitions and divestitures.

Chair:

    Mr. Fascitelli

Additional Committee Members:

    Mr. Bronson

    Mr. Margolis

    Ms. Sears

    Mr. Tanner

•  Governed by a Board-approved charter

Primary Responsibilities:

•  overseeing matters related to the Company’s investments in real estate assets proposed by management;

•  overseeing the performance of the Company’s assets;

•    reviewing the Company’s investment and disposition policies, procedures, strategies and programs; and

•  reviewing the Company’s capital raising and other financing activities.

The Investment and Finance Committee charter is available on our website at: at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents”—“Investment and Finance Committee Charter.”

2021 Proxy Statement20


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board nominees for election as director, and the Board is responsible for selecting nominees for election. This nomination process occurs as part of the nomination of the slate of directors nominated for election at our annual meeting of stockholders and at times when there is a vacancy on the Board or other need to add a director to the Board.

2018 Proxy Statement16


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

As part of this nomination process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence, diversity and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board and, in considering such candidates, also assesses the size, composition and combined expertise of the Board and the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates, but rather takes into account all factors it considers appropriate such as the individual’s relevant career experience, strength of character, judgment, familiarity with the Company’s business and industry, independence of thought, an ability to work collegially, diversity of background, existing commitments to other businesses, potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits, legal considerations, corporate governance background, financial and accounting background, executive compensation background, relevant industry experience and technical skills and the size, composition and combined expertise of the existing Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals and/or receive recommendations from other members of the Board, management, stockholders and other sources, including third party recommendations. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may but need not,also retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral or recommendation. When considering director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Board’s effectiveness.

In connection with its annual recommendation of a slate of nominees for election at the annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may assess the contributions of those directors recommended forre-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board. When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the board member’sdirector nominees’ biographical information set forth above.

172018 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

We believe that our directors provide an appropriate mixIn connection with its recommendation of experience and skills relevant to the size and naturea slate of our business. This process resulted in the Board’s nomination of the directors named in this Proxy Statement and proposednominees for election by you at the Annual Meeting. We believe that the director nominees are highly qualified individuals who possess a range of relevant skills, expertiseMeeting, our Nominating and attributes, such as:

LOGO

Each of Messrs. Caplan, HarperCorporate Governance Committee and Stein were recommended by Blackstone to serve on our Board pursuant to the stockholders agreements described below under “Transactions with Related Persons,” and each of Messrs. Blair and Rhea were recommended by Blackstone and our management. After working with an independent third-party search firm to identify potential candidates, the Board appointed Ms. Sears to serve onalso considered that Mr. Bronson reached the Board. Eachage of 76 in 2021 and determined that, because of Mr. Tuomi, Bronson, Fascitelli, KelterBronson’s expertise, valuable business insights and Sternlicht were appointedstrong commitment to serve onInvitation Homes, an exception to our Board pursuantgeneral practice to the terms of our merger agreement with SWH. Each of the foregoingnot recommend for reelection a director nominees was evaluated in accordance with our standard review process for director candidates in connection with their initial appointment and their nomination for electionfollowing his orre-election, as applicable, at the Annual Meeting. her 75th birthday is warranted.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any recommendation submitted to the Secretary of the Company should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201. All recommendations for nomination received by the Corporate Secretary that satisfy our bylaw requirements relating to such director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its

2018 Proxy Statement18


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters(continued)

consideration. Stockholders also must satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent and information requirements set forth in our Bylaws. These requirements are also described under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the 20192022 Annual Meeting.”

Composition of the Board Committees

The Board, upon recommendation from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, annually reviews and determines the composition of the committees. Through periodic committee refreshment, we balance the benefits derived from continuity and depth of experience with the benefits gained from fresh perspectives and enhancing our directors’ understanding of different aspects of our business.

212021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

As part of our ongoing commitment to proactive Committee refreshment, following the Annual Meeting, the Board plans to appoint the following members to the standing committees (assuming all director nominees are elected).

Director

Audit Committee

Compensation and     

Management          

Development         

Committee         

Nominating and

Corporate Governance

Committee

Investment and

Finance Committee

  Michael D. Fascitelli*

  Dallas B. Tanner

Member
  Jana Cohen BarbeMemberMember

  Richard D. Bronson

Member

Member

  Jeffrey E. Kelter

MemberChairperson
  Joseph D. Margolis

Member

Member
  John B. Rhea

Chairperson

Member
  J. Heidi Roizen

Member

Member

  Janice L. SearsChairpersonMember

  William J. SteinMember

Chairperson

*

Chairperson of the Board

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We are committed to exercising strong corporate governance practices. Good governance promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and improves our standing as a trusted member of the communities we serve.

Our governance structure and processes are guided by key governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters, which govern the operation of the Board and its committees in the execution of their responsibilities. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed periodically by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, changing regulatory requirements and issues raised by our stockholders, revised accordingly upon recommendation to and approval by our Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, and other corporate governance information are available on our website at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents.” Any stockholder may also request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary of Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that is applicable to all of our directors, officers and associates, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“Corporate Governance”—“Governance Documents.” Our Code of Conduct sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, use of our assets, gifts and entertainment, fraud, outside activities, political contributions, bribery, corruption, and business conduct and fair dealing. Our Code of Conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. We intend to make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of our Code of Conduct on our website rather than by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K and within the time period required under applicable rules and regulations.

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions, which are meetings of the non-management members of the Board, generally take place at every regular Board meeting. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and directors who have not been determined independent. At each of these meetings, the non-management and independent directors in attendance, as applicable, will determine which member will preside at such session.

2021 Proxy Statement22


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

Communications with the Board

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Chairperson of the Board, the chairperson of any of the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees or to thenon-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to Office of the Chief Legal Officer of the Company, at Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201, who will forward such communications to the appropriate party. Such communications may be done confidentially or anonymously.

Stock Ownership PolicyOversight of Risk Management

Our Board and management believe that effective risk management involves our entire corporate governance framework. Both our Board and management have key responsibilities in managing risk throughout the Company. Our Board provides overall risk oversight, both directly and through its committees, to identify and assess the major risks our Company faces, and oversees the policies and procedures for monitoring and controlling such risks.

We have adopted a stock ownership policy under which eachface various forms of risk in our business ranging from broad economic, housing market, and interest rate risks, to more specific factors, such as credit risk related to our residents, re-leasing of properties and competition for properties. See Part I. Item I. “Business—Risk Management” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s officers subject to Section 16 offiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “2020 Form 10-K”). We believe that the Exchange Actsystems and each nonemployee director serving onprocesses developed by our experienced executive team, with the Board who is eligible to receive compensation for his or her service on the Board or committee thereof is expected to own sharesstrategic counsel and stewardship of our common stock equal in market valueBoard, allow us to effectively monitor, manage and ultimately mitigate these risks. A fundamental part of risk oversight is not only understanding the material risks a specified multiple of his or her annual base salary or cash retainer, as applicable. Under this policy, our President and Chief Executive Officer is expected to own equity in an amount equal to six times his or her annual base salary, the other officers are expected to own equity in an amount equal to three times his or her annual base salarycompany faces and the compensated directors are expectedsteps management is taking to own equitymanage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. The Board is supported in an amount equalits risk oversight function by its Audit Committee (the committee responsible for overseeing our enterprise risk management activities), Compensation and Management Development Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Investment and Finance Committee. Each of these committees regularly meets with and reports to five times his or her annual cash retainerthe Board. Management is responsible for serving onidentifying material risks, implementing appropriate risk management strategies, integrating risk management into our decision-making process and ensuring that information with respect to material risks is transmitted to senior executives and the Board (exclusive of any cash payable for service on a committeeBoard. Members of the Board or as a chairpersonregularly meet with members of management and other key personnel who advise the Board on areas of enterprise risk, the Company’s risk mitigation and response strategies and any incidents that have arisen.

One of the most significant risks and uncertainties in 2020 and currently is the potential adverse effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We created an internal taskforce to closely monitor the progression of COVID-19 and related developments. This team, led by our senior management, follows the guidance of local, state and national officials, as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve. This taskforce provides regular updates to our Board. We have implemented a host of measures in response to the pandemic, including modifying the workplace and adopting new business practices to align with health protocols and changing operational realities. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Response to COVID-19.” As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt business activity, our Board plays a critical role by guiding and supporting management as they adapt our operations in response to the pandemic and ensuring that the Company positions itself to emerge from the crisis stronger and more resilient.

Information technology and data security, particularly cybersecurity, are also areas of focus for our Board and its Audit Committee, as our operations are highly dependent upon information systems that support our business processes. Cyber intrusions could seriously compromise our networks and the information stored therein could be accessed, publicly disclosed, misused, lost or stolen. In the face of ever-changing and increasing cyber threats, our Board is well-positioned to guide management in the development of an effective cybersecurity risk program for our Company. The Board or committee of the Board). The ownership requirement is expectedits Audit Committee typically meets no less often than semi-annually with senior information technology personnel to be satisfied within five years of the date that the person becomes subjectdiscuss recent trends in cyber risks and reviews our strategy to the policy. In addition, the stock ownership policy provides that, until such person satisfies the ownership requirement, he or she is required to retain at least 50% of the equity such person holds that qualifies toward the ownership requirementdefend our business systems and once the ownership requirement is met, the person must retain the requisite level of equity for so long as he or she is subject to the policy.information against cyber attacks.

 

   1923  20182021 Proxy Statement


 

  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

 

 

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSThe table below shows the Board’s and management’s key responsibilities in managing and overseeing risk throughout the Company.

During 2017, our Board underwent several changes, first, in connection with our IPO and, then, in connection with our Merger. As a result, during 2017 our Board was composed as follows:Risk Oversight Responsibilities

 

Board

Risk Areas

Strategic

•  Reputation

•  Market Dynamics

•  Acquisitions & Dispositions

Operational

•  Sales & Marketing

•  Service & Delivery

•  Information Systems & Cybersecurity

•  Infrastructure & Assets

•  Hazards &
Weather

•  People

Financial

•  Financial Reporting & Internal Controls

•  Capital Structure

•  Market

•  Liquidity & Credit

•  Tax

Legal, Regulatory & Compliance

•  Environmental

•  Social

•  Governance

NameCOVID-19

•  Market Dynamics; Acquisitions & Dispositions

•  Rental Income

•  Service & Delivery

•  People (Safety & Wellness)

•  Business Continuity

•  Liquidity & Capital Markets

 

January 1, 2017                   Responsibilities

•  Overall oversight of the risk management process

•  Development of business strategy and major resource allocation

•  Leadership of management succession planning

•  Business conduct and compliance oversight

•  Receipt of regular reports from Board committees on specific risk oversight responsibilities

to                   Board Committees

January 31, 2017                   Audit

(Pre-IPO)                   

 

January 31, 2017                   Compensation and
Management
Development

to                   

November 16, 2017                   

(Post-IPO and Pre-Merger)                  

November 16, 2017                   

to present                   

(Post-Merger)                   

John B. Bartling Jr.(1)

 

 x                   

x                   

 

Bryce BlairNominating and
Corporate

Governance

 

 x                   

 

x                   

x                   

Investment and
Finance

 

Richard D. Bronson(2)•   Oversight of enterprise risk management activities (including technology, data and cyber security)

•   Oversight of accounting and financial reporting

•   Oversight of integrity of financial statements

•   Oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to accounting and financial reporting processes

•   Oversight of the performance of internal audit function

•   Oversight of the effectiveness of internal controls

•   Oversight of registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence

 

 

•   Oversight of compensation-related risks and overall philosophy, as further described under “Other Matters—Risk Mitigation” in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis below

•   Oversight of regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters

•   Oversight of executive succession planning and management development

 

•   Overall corporate governance leadership

•   Recommendations regarding Board and Committee composition

•   Board succession planning

•   Oversight of regulatory compliance and corporate governance initiatives

•   Oversight of the evaluation of the Board

•   Oversight of ESG strategy, initiatives and policies

 x                   

•   Oversight of asset portfolio and potential acquisitions and divestitures

•   Oversight of investment and financing policies and practices

•   Review of proposed equity and debt transactions, swaps and hedging transactions

•   Overall oversight of finance requirements, plans and strategies

Management

 

Responsibilities

 

Kenneth A. Caplan(3)•   Identify material risks

x                   

•   Implement appropriate risk management strategies

Michael D. Fascitelli(2)•   Integrate risk management into our decision-making process

•   Ensure that information with respect to material risks is transmitted to senior executives and the Board

x                   

Nicholas C. Gould

x                   

x                   

Peter E. Gould

x                   

Jonathan D. Gray(3)

x                   

x                   

x                   

Robert G. Harper(3)

x                   

x                   

Jeffrey E. Kelter(2)

x                   

Devin Peterson(3)

x                   

John B. Rhea

x                   

x                   

x                   

David A. Roth(3)

x                   

x                   

John G. Schrieber

x                   

Janice L. Sears

x                   

x                   

William J. Stein(3)

x                   

x                   

x                   

Barry S. Sternlicht(2)

x                   

Dallas B. Tanner(1)

x                   

Frederick C. Tuomi(1)(2)

x                   

 

 

(1)Employed by the Company, as applicable.
2021 Proxy Statement24


(2)

The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

Sustainability Initiatives

At Invitation Homes, we are committed to creating an exceptional leasing experience for our residents and leading the single-family industry by example. As the nation’s premier home leasing company, we have an opportunity to make a profound impact by offering quality homes where our residents can feel safe and careers where our associates can thrive. Our mission, vision, and values define our daily actions in delivering on our pledge to be a responsible corporate citizen. Our mission statement, “Together with you, we make a house a home,” reflects our commitment to a resident-centric business philosophy. It is important that each day, we live out our values of Unshakeable Integrity, Genuine Care, Continuous Excellence, and Standout Citizenship as we strive to benefit our residents, our associates, our communities, and our stockholders while at the same time advancing efforts that make us more innovative and our processes more sustainable.

LOGO

We believe that integrating ESG initiatives into our strategic business objectives is critical to our long-term success. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we launched a formal ESG materiality assessment to identify opportunities for us to make the biggest impact in the areas that our stakeholders prioritize. In order to ensure consistent attention and focus on ESG matters, we have created a dedicated, cross-functional ESG taskforce of associates led by executive management. As a part of their role as stewards of our company’s long-term performance, our Board plays a critical role in understanding how ESG issues affect our business strategy and performance and provides oversight with respect to our ESG initiatives and policies. This responsibility is assigned to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee works closely with management and regularly meets with and reports to the Board on our ESG strategy, initiatives, and policies. We also believe in the value of feedback, and we hold ourselves accountable. To that end, we participate in the GRESB Real Estate Assessment for a third-party evaluation of our ESG performance, and have linked this performance to the pricing of our revolving credit facility, whereby improvements in our GRESB score over time can benefit our borrowing costs under the facility. Through our integrated and ongoing approach to sustainability and corporate responsibility, we seek to drive positive change and create value for our stakeholders.

Sustainability and corporate social responsibility are vitally important to who we are as a company. Our guiding social responsibility, business, and workplace policies apply to our directors, officers, associates, and vendors, and they are posted on our website. These policies apply to all activities undertaken by or on behalf of Invitation Homes anywhere we operate. Among other things, these policies encompass areas of community and associate engagement, diversity and inclusion, human rights, corporate governance and ethics, and environmental initiatives that reflect existing and emerging standards of corporate social responsibility. Please visit our Sustainability page on www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Sustainability” for more information on our sustainability and corporate social responsibility initiatives and principles.

Formerly on SWH’s
252021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and joinedCertain Governance Matters (continued)

Environmental Stewardship

Protecting the environment is critically important to us, and our corporate responsibility initiatives help limit the company’s carbon footprint and the environmental impact of our homes. We take our responsibility around carbon emissions very seriously, and we continue to look for ways to lower the level of emissions from our homes. While our residents are responsible for utilities that control energy and water usage, we take a proactive approach to improving the environmental footprint of our portfolio by, among other things:

Using energy-efficient ENERGY STAR® certified appliances when feasible;

Utilizing Smart Home technology to help residents manage their homes and reduce their energy bills;

Installing low-flow plumbing fixtures and greater efficiency HVAC units;

Installing water-saving landscape designs in arid locations;

Educating residents about energy-efficient practices;

Maintaining stocked vehicles to reduce trips to hardware stores and eliminate unnecessary travel;

Reducing drive times for our repair technicians by optimizing routes and triaging maintenance issues; and

Launching an HVAC air filter home delivery program for our residents, which may prolong the life of our HVAC systems, may reduce expenses associated with repairs, may minimize downtime associated with system failure, and may provide better air quality in the home.

As the climate continues to change, and with a portfolio located in a variety of United States markets that include coastal areas, we recognize the increased likelihood of acute weather events and other climate-related impacts to our business, operations, and homes. We take a proactive approach to protect our properties against potential risks related to climate change and business interruptions, and we recognize that we must continue to adapt our policies, objectives, and processes to improve the resiliency of our physical properties and our business.

Social Responsibility

Residents

Our success is fueled by the growing demand for high-quality, single-family homes for lease. Many things contribute to an exceptional experience for our residents – the speed and effectiveness of our service, the quality of our portfolio through our ongoing commitment to maintaining our homes, the Genuine Care we provide in each interaction, and much more. By offering quality homes in attractive neighborhoods, we believe we give residents the choice to lease a home in a community that may not have otherwise been attainable. We strive to provide our residents with a worry-free leasing lifestyle through service that includes welcoming them with a home orientation at move-in, making their lives easier with our Smart Home technology offering, and providing 24/7 maintenance combined with our best-in-class ProCare property management service platform. ProCare is an innovative platform designed to provide regular opportunities for us to inspect our assets, proactively address issues, and ensure each home continues to meet our standards.

With the safety and well-being of our residents and associates being our highest priority during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to follow protocols that enable teams to safely provide outstanding service to residents. These protocols include: implementing a safety training program and providing personal protective equipment for all associates; adhering to strict safety protocols for maintenance service trips; leveraging self-show and virtual-tour technology; and offering virtual options for resident move-in orientations and pre-move-out visits. Additionally, while the COVID-19 pandemic has required us to modify our property improvement and maintenance procedures to accommodate resident safety preferences, as a currently designated “essential business” we are completing all maintenance work orders unless a resident reports symptoms of or exposure to COVID-19.

In March 2020, to act on our core values of Genuine Care and Standout Citizenship, we began to offer solutions for residents experiencing financial hardship when requested, including the ongoing creation of payment plans, without late fees, for residents requiring flexibility to meet rental obligations over time. Additionally, we continue to adhere to federal, state, and local restrictions on items such as evictions, collections, rent increases, and late fees as appropriate.

2021 Proxy Statement26


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

We also believe it is important to listen to our residents, and we take their feedback to heart on our quest to continuously enhance the Genuine Care we provide. We survey residents at each key step in their journey with Invitation Homes, such as at move-in and move-out, and after every in-person interaction they have with an Invitation Homes associate or vendor. We use this feedback to hold ourselves accountable, with all of our associates having a portion of their compensation tied directly to resident satisfaction survey scores. We also use feedback from surveys and focus groups to help inform new service offerings and enhancements we make to the resident experience. In addition to our website and resident surveys, we engage with our residents through monthly resident newsletters, blog posts, and social media campaigns and contests.

Human Capital

Associates are the backbone of our company. Nothing happens without the day-to-day dedication of our invaluable associates. Whether they are a front-line brand ambassador who represents us each and every day with our residents, or a back-of-the-house support team member who ensures we continue to move forward, our associates are our greatest asset. From our focus on associates’ wellbeing, health, and safety to our support for a diverse and inclusive culture, we treat each other fairly and act with honesty, integrity, and respect.

We passionately believe that diverse and inclusive companies make for more innovative, engaged, and happy teams. Our organization celebrates diversity and cultivates a culture of inclusion. We recognize the value of our associates and the need for the Company to build and sustain a culture where associates of diverse backgrounds and abilities contribute their unique viewpoints and perspectives to all aspects of the business. In 2020, we launched a purposeful diversity and inclusion (“D&I”) journey pursuant to which we hired a D&I leader and executed a campaign in which our associates were educated on our commitment to D&I.

As of December 2020, over 40% of our associates are female and over 42% of our associates are people of color. We currently have two active Employee Resource Groups (“ERG”), Together With Women and The Black Collective. In 2021, we will further expand our footprint with the launch of multiple ERGs and a continued focus on ensuring significant and meaningful progress against our key D&I metrics. Our D&I stance contributes to our overall business strategy and serves as a catalyst for retaining our associates, recruiting diverse talent, and building beneficial business relationships with key stakeholders. This business imperative will help us increase the diversity of our workforce, retain and upskill our talent, and enhance our company’s culture. In turn, this will progress our standing as an employer of choice and the nation’s premier home leasing company.

We value continuous dialogue with our associates. In May 2020, we launched a new monthly associate survey tool, called “Our Family. Your Voice.”, which replaced a previously used annual survey. In less than eight months’ time, the survey received more than 94% participation and has provided us with manager-level actionable feedback on several key engagement dimensions. We believe that high monthly participation rates are a strong indication of high engagement and recognition that responses will lead to meaningful action.

We recognize the value of providing regular development opportunities for our associates and help them advance their skills and knowledge. In addition to our annual compliance training campaigns, we offer more than 3,000 online learning and development videos designed to help associates build their skills.

We are committed to accelerating the development of our leaders. In 2020, we created and launched a formal leadership program called “Leadership Essentials” that marks the beginning of our journey to build capable and confident leaders that can lead and inspire a diverse workforce in an ever-changing environment. As part of Leadership Essentials training and our commitment to D&I, we included both D&I and Awareness of Unconscious Bias training for our leaders.

We take considerable steps to ensure the health, safety, and well-being of our associates. In 2019, we conducted our first annual associate engagement survey and formed teams to address underlying issues that surfaced in the results. In early 2020, we rolled out two new benefits programs—flexible work arrangements and parental leave—as a direct result of the survey. Our company’s workplace wellness initiatives, such as health and wellness services, promote healthy habits and demonstrate managerial support for associates’ physical and emotional well-being. Invitation Homes is committed to associate health and welfare by providing a competitive benefits package, including health, dental, vision, term life and disability insurance.

272021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

We continue to evolve our health and safety processes to help significantly reduce on-the-job injuries and review and monitor our performance monthly. Our goal is to reduce Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordable incidents every year; and over the past three years, our workplace safety programs have successfully reduced annual on-the-job injuries from 79 to 40, or 49.4%. One of our significant programs in 2020 was to provide “Driving Safety” training for our fleet drivers covering topics like defensive driving techniques and vehicle condition and safety features. Additionally, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we established a taskforce that crafted a “Safe Work Playbook” and “Interim Policy Guide,” outlining a consistent way for each of our offices to return to work safely when it is appropriate to do so. We also created formal training for both our field-based and office-based associates to educate and train on these new safety practices and protocols. The majority of our office-based associates continue to work from home and will do so until we determine it is in our and their best interests to fully return to our offices.

We believe it is critically important to maintain a corporate culture that demands integrity and reflects ethical values. Everyone who works at or with Invitation Homes should feel confident about our high ethical standards, our honesty, and our integrity. Our Code of Conduct helps guide us as we collaborate to accomplish our goals together, while holding ourselves individually responsible for our work and accountable for our actions. Our Vendor Code of Conduct is an extension of our values to our vendors and serves to highlight our commitment to ethical business practices and regulatory compliance

Communities

Being a good neighbor is critical in the communities where we do business. This includes volunteering in our local communities and contributing dollars to non-profit organizations doing good in our markets. It also involves the full economic impact of our business on the community, through home renovations completed by local vendors, real estate taxes, homeowners’ association (“HOA”) fees and dues, and locally purchased goods and services. We recognize that the vitality of our business is directly linked to the vitality of the communities in which we operate. We invest in upfront renovations of our homes and maintain them to high standards through timely maintenance services. As of December 31, 2020, we and our predecessors have invested approximately $2.4 billion in the upfront renovation of homes in our portfolio. We invested approximately $39,000 per home for upfront renovations completed during the year ended December 31, 2020. Further, we maintain our homes to high standards through timely maintenance services as well as through our proprietary ProCare service. We believe that these investments benefit our communities by creating jobs, enhancing neighborhood appearance and livability, and improving the overall quality of life for our residents and their neighbors. In addition, we believe such investments improve our relationships with local communities and HOAs and enhance our brand recognition and loyalty.

We believe our values of Genuine Care and Standout Citizenship should extend beyond the walls of our offices and drive our desire to be a good neighbor in each of our communities. While we have a company-wide community impact mantra of “Go Do Good,” much of our community engagement is locally driven. We believe in empowering our associates to make an impact in the communities where they work and reside by partnering with local organizations to provide support to those in need. In addition, each year Invitation Homes associates receive 20 hours of paid time to volunteer in their communities and help their local neighbors. During 2020, many of our nonprofit partners and local organizations offered virtual volunteer experiences that provided safe social distancing options while still enabling us to make an impact, including card and gift showers for the residents and staff of senior living residences and homebound elderly citizens, mentoring and reading, delivering food to veterans and elderly citizens, contributing food and school supplies, collecting and delivering toys, cleaning beaches, and providing other needed support in their communities. We also offer an annual “There’s No Place Like Home” scholarship contest, awarding scholarships for higher learning to residents, associates, and community members.

Additionally, in 2020, we worked with a leading social impact agency to design a signature social initiative program for Invitation Homes with a targeted pilot launch date in the fall of 2021. The program, “Invitation to Your Dream Job,” will broaden access to essential jobs for diverse students who are pursuing careers in skilled trades fields and help serve as an economic driver in our markets. Once our program is fully realized, we expect to annually help 2,250 individuals and their families move toward meaningful employment and financial security. We will also work to highlight the value of these critical workers in our communities. By providing funding to trade schools across our network, we can directly help people upskill and learn trade skills while shifting the perceptions about trade careers.

2021 Proxy Statement28


The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

Corporate Governance and Ethics

We take very seriously the responsibility that individuals and organizations have chosen to invest in our company, and we strive every day to ensure that our actions result in value for these investors. We believe that ethical business practices and sound governance promote the long-term interests of our stockholders, strengthen Board and management accountability, and improve our standing as a trusted member of the communities we serve. We are committed to the principles of good corporate governance and have implemented internal policies and procedures to ensure that our governance practices are best in class and align our interests with those of our stockholders. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Corporate Governance” for more information about our corporate governance practices.

We believe it is critically important to maintain a corporate culture that demands integrity and reflects our ethical values. We are committed to operating at the highest ethical level and serving as a responsible fiduciary for our stockholders. Everyone who works at or with Invitation Homes should feel confident about our high ethical standards, our honesty, and our integrity. Our daily decisions are driven by our Code of Conduct, which demonstrates our commitment to be a responsible corporate citizen and a good business partner. The Code of Conduct is supported by associate conduct policies and programs and reinforced through regular associate training. We have zero tolerance in relation to illegal or unethical conduct, and this is articulated in our relevant policies, including policies on conflicts of interest, gifts and entertainment, fraud, sanctions, outside activities, political contributions, and bribery and corruption. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” for more information about our Code of Conduct.

Our confidential compliance hotline is a critical part of our ethics and compliance program. The hotline is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and is operated by a third-party compliance management provider, enabling automated and anonymous reporting. We have implemented a “whistleblower” policy that allows our associates to file reports regarding any impropriety on a confidential and anonymous basis and establishes comprehensive procedures for the receipt, retention, investigation, and treatment of reports. The reports are reviewed with our Audit Committee at meetings throughout the year. Neither our company, nor any director, officer, associate, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of the company will, directly or indirectly, discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any manner discriminate or retaliate against any person who, in good faith, makes a report or assists in investigating a report

We expect the same high standards of those who work with us and represent us, and our Vendor Code of Conduct is an extension of our values to our vendors and serves to highlight our commitment to ethical business practices and regulatory compliance. The Vendor Code of Conduct is posted on our website www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Sustainability”—“Governance and Ethical Business Practices”—“Vendor Practices.”

Response to COVID-19

Along with our management, our Board rapidly identified the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential to impact the global economic environment, the industry in which we operate and the way that we conduct our business. The ultimate impacts remain unknown, but could range from macroeconomic effects, such as the potential worsening of global and United States economic conditions and the continued disruptions to, and volatility in, the credit and financial markets, consumer spending, and the market for acquisition and disposition of single-family homes, to more industry-specific effects, including depressed collection rates, higher or lower occupancy levels, restrictions on evictions, collections, rent increases, and late fees and other unanticipated consequences. As such, we are closely monitoring the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of our business, including operating, investment management, and capital markets activities and will continue to actively manage our response in collaboration with our residents and business partners.

We have implemented a host of measures in response to the pandemic, including modifying the workplace and adopting new business practices to align with health protocols, complying with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, and adapting to changing operational realities. With the safety and well-being of our residents and associates being our highest priority, we continue to follow protocols that enable teams to safely continue providing outstanding service to residents. Below we summarize key actions we have undertaken in response to the pandemic to protect our associates, stockholders and residents.

292021 Proxy Statement


  The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters (continued)

What we do for our associates:

•  Adhere to a safety training program for all associates (“Safe Work Playbook” and “Interim Policy Guide”), outlining a consistent way for each of our offices to return to work safely when it is appropriate to do so.

•  Maintain a supply of masks, gloves, shoe covers, and hand sanitizer for field teams.

•  Adhere to strict safety protocols for maintenance service trips.

•  Offer virtual options for resident move-in orientations and pre-move-out visits.

•  Continue flexible work from home arrangements for the majority of our office-based associates until we determine it is in our and their best interests to fully return to our offices.

•  Paid a one-time appreciation bonus in the amount of $1,000 to all associates not eligible to participate in our long-term equity incentive programs.

•  Provided 100% no cost sharing of benefits for testing and treatment of COVID-19.

•  Allowed for a mid-year election changes to health care and dependent care flexible spending accounts without a qualifying life event.

•  Waived seven-day waiting period for short-term disability for associates who tested positive for COVID-19.

What we do for our stockholders:

•  Closely monitor the progression of COVID-19 and related developments via our internal taskforce.

•  Regularly inform our Board about all major aspects of our business. Our Board remains actively engaged with management and continues to meet more frequently to understand the unique challenges we are encountering.

•  Keep our stockholders updated about our actions in connectionresponse to the pandemic.

•  Maintained our quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share through 2020 and increased it to $0.17 per share beginning with our first quarter 2021 dividend payment.

What we do for our residents:

•  Adhere to strict safety protocols for maintenance service trips.

•  Offer virtual options for resident move-in orientations and pre-move-out visits.

•  Leverage self-show and virtual-tour technology.

•  Offer solutions for residents experiencing financial hardship when requested, including the Merger.

(3)Affiliated with Blackstone.ongoing creation of payment plans, without late fees, for residents requiring flexibility to meet rental obligations over time.

•  Continue to adhere to Federal, State, and local restrictions on items such as evictions, collections, rent increases, and late fees as appropriate.

Both priorThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lives of our associates, our residents, and our communities. We are proud of how our team has responded, showing resilience, innovating in real time, and demonstrating the tremendous value of our resident-centric business philosophy and commitment to community.

2021 Proxy Statement30


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our non-employee directors are entitled to receive cash compensation, as well as equity compensation in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), for their Board service. Mr.  Tanner, our President and following our IPO,CEO, receives no director employed by us or affiliated with Blackstone received compensation for serving on our Board. Accordingly, in 2017, neither Messrs. Bartling, Caplan, Gray, Harper, Peterson, Roth, Stein, Tanner nor Tuomi received compensation for serving on our Board.

2020 Annual Director Compensation Program

In connection with2020, our IPO, we adopted an annual director compensation program under which eligiblenon-employee directors are entitled to receivereceived annual compensation, as follows:

 

a

an annual cash retainer of $60,000 ($350,000$70,000, and $220,000 in the case of the Board Chairperson);Chairperson;

 

an additional cash retainer of $20,000 for those serving as the chairpersonchairpersons of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Investment and Finance Committee; and

 

an equity award of $120,000 ($350,000 in the case of the Board Chairperson)$145,000, in the form of time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”),time vesting RSUs, granted on the date of the annual stockholders meeting, which will generally vest in full on the date of our next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date, subject to the director’s continued service on such vesting date, and will be in respect of a number of shares equal to the award amount divided by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date.

 

2018 Proxy Statement20


Compensation of Directors(continued)

 

In additionLOGO

$20,000 Additional Annual Cash Retainers

for Committee Chairs

All RSUs granted to directors entitle the director to dividend equivalent payments in respect of the director’s RSUs, whether his or her RSUs are unvested or vested and not yet settled. The dividend equivalents are deliverable to the foregoing, Mr. Blair continuesdirector on the regular payment date that such dividends are made to receive an annual stipendthe Company’s stockholders and in an amount of $40,000the same form as delivered to such stockholders whether in connection withcash or common stock. To date, all dividends declared on the cost of his administrative support services. Our directors do not otherwise receive any other Company-paid or reimbursed personal benefits.Company’s common stock were paid in cash. In addition, our directors are not paid any fees for attending meetings,meetings; however, each director is reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses associated with his or her attendance at Board or committee meetings.

Our Compensation and Management Development Committee is responsible for reviewing and advising on the compensation of our non-employee directors. To assist with this duty, they have engaged an independent compensation consultant, FPL Associates, L.P. (“FPL”), to perform periodic reviews of our non-employee director compensation program, which includes an analysis of market trends and best practices and a comparison versus our peer group companies. The compensation program for our non-employee directors was last reviewed and revised in February 2020, upon recommendation of the Compensation and Management Development Committee in consultation with FPL.

Our non-employee directors who receive compensation for their service on the Board are also subject to a stock ownership policy, as described below under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

312021 Proxy Statement


  Compensation of Directors (continued)

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 20172020

The table below sets forth information regardingnon-employee director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

Name

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)(1)

Stock Awards

($)(2)(3)

All Other

Compensation

($)(4)

Total

($)

 

John B. Bartling Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryce Blair

 

$

 

475,833

 

 

$

 

6,081,243

 

 

$

 

44,045

 

 

$

 

6,601,121

 

 

 

Richard D. Bronson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kenneth A. Caplan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael D. Fascitelli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nicholas C. Gould

 

$

 

75,833

 

 

$

 

775,000

 

 

$

 

4,674

 

 

$

 

855,507

 

 

 

Peter E. Gould

 

$

 

20,833

 

 

$

 

625,000

 

 

$

 

6,109

 

 

$

 

651,942

 

 

 

Jonathan D. Gray

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert G. Harper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jeffrey E. Kelter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Devin Peterson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Rhea

 

$

 

183,750

 

 

$

 

390,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

573,750

 

 

 

David A. Roth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John G. Schrieber

 

$

 

83,750

 

 

$

 

150,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

233,750

 

 

 

Janice L. Sears

 

$

 

60,000

 

 

$

 

270,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

330,000

 

 

 

William J. Stein

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barry S. Sternlicht

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frederick C. Tuomi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Name

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)

Stock Awards
($)
(1)(2)

Total
($)
   

Bryce Blair

$220,000$145,023$365,023
   

Jana Cohen Barbe

$  70,000$145,023$215,023
   

Richard D. Bronson

$  70,000$145,023$215,023
   

Kenneth A. Caplan(3)

   

Michael D. Fascitelli

$  90,000$145,023$235,023
   

Robert G. Harper(3)

   

Jeffrey E. Kelter

$  70,000$145,023$215,023
   

Joseph D. Margolis(4)

$  42,885$145,023$187,908
   

John B. Rhea

$  90,000$145,023$235,023
   

J. Heidi Roizen(4)

$  42,885$145,023$187,908
   

Janice L. Sears

$  90,000$145,023$235,023
   

Barry S. Sternlicht(4)

$  27,115$  27,115
   

William J. Stein(4)

$  55,137$145,023$200,160

 

(1)Represents the cash fees earned by each director during 2017 pursuant to our director compensation program then in effect prorated for the period he or she served on the Board and committees thereof during 2017. Following our IPO and prior to the Merger, Mr. Blair continued to serve as Board Chairperson and initially served as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Rhea initially served as Chairperson of the Audit Committee and Mr. Stein served as the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In September 2017, Mr. Rhea and Ms. Sears were appointed to serve as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee, respectively. As a result of the period during 2017 during which the director served as a committee chairperson, the 2017 committee chairperson fees were as follows: Mr. Blair—$15,000; Mr. Rhea—$20,000; and Ms. Sears—$5,000. In addition to the fees earned as part of our annual director compensation program, the Board also awarded cash payments of $100,000 for each of Messrs. Blair and Rhea in recognition of additional effort they provided during 2017 as members of the director working group in connection with the Merger. As employees of Blackstone, Messrs. Harper and Stein, who were the other members of this director working group, agreed that they would not receive such payments.

(2)Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the equitydirectors’ annual RSU awards granted in 20172020 calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on2020 Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “201710-K”).10-K. In accordance with the SEC’s rules, dividend equivalents that accrued on equity awards in 20172020 are not reported above, because dividends were factored into the grant date fair value of these awards.

(2)

As of December 31, 2020, each non-employee director held 5,869 unvested RSUs, representing each director’s 2020 annual RSU award.

(3)

Kenneth A. Caplan and Robert G. Harper served on our Board for a portion of 2020, but were not nominated for re-election at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. Messrs. Caplan and Harper were appointed to our Board pursuant to the terms of our previous stockholders agreement (as amended and restated, the “Stockholders Agreement”) with affiliates of Blackstone. The Stockholders Agreement required us to nominate a number of individuals designated by Blackstone for election as our directors at any meeting of our stockholders, based on the percentage of Blackstone’s beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Following the sale by Blackstone of all of its shares of our common stock in November 2019, the Stockholders Agreement, including the provisions relating to the nomination of directors, terminated and is no longer in effect. No director appointed pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, Including Messrs. Harper and Caplan, received compensation for serving on our Board in 2020.

(4)

Joseph D. Margolis and J. Heidi Roizen were elected to our Board at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and received an annual RSU award and a portion of annual cash retainer prorated for their service on our Board from May 20, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Barry S. Sternlicht served on our Board for a portion of 2020, but was not nominated for re-election at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Sternlicht received a portion of annual cash retainer prorated for his service on our Board from January 1, 2020 to May 20, 2020. Mr. Stein received compensation for Board service following his election at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders due to the termination of the Stockholders Agreement. Mr. Stein received an annual RSU award and a portion of annual cash retainer prorated for his service on our Board and as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from May 20, 2020 to December 31, 2020.

 

212018 Proxy Statement


  Compensation of Directors(continued)

The grant date values reflected in the table above are in respect of: (a) the directors’ annual RSU awards; (b) the special RSU awards granted to Mr. Rhea and Ms. Sears at the time of the IPO; (c) Mr. Blair’s RSAs (as defined below) received in respect of his Incentive Units in the IH Promote Partnerships (each as defined below); (d) Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould’s and Blair’s RSUs received in respect of his IH6 Bonus Awards (as defined below); and (e) Mr. Blair’s RSUs received in respect of his Supplemental Bonus Award (as defined below).

(3)As of December 31, 2017, the directors held unvested equity as follows:

 

Director

  

 

RSUs

   

 

RSAs

 

 

Bryce Blair

 

   

 

201,197

 

 

 

   

 

258

 

 

 

 

Richard D. Bronson

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Nicholas C. Gould

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Peter E. Gould

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Jeffrey E. Kelter

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Rhea

 

   

 

19,500

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

John G. Schrieber

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Janice L. Sears

 

   

 

13,500

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Barry S. Sternlicht

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(4)The amount reported for Mr. Blair represents the Company-reimbursed costs for Mr. Blair’s administrative support services and Company-paid medical and dental premiums (the employer portion of the premiums) for Mr. Blair and his family. The amount reported for Nicholas Gould represents the Company-paid medical and dental premiums (both the employer and the participant portion of the premiums) for Mr. Gould and his family and Company-paid cell phone service. The amount reported for Peter Gould represents Company-paid medical and dental premiums (both the employer and the participant portion of the premiums) for Mr. Gould and his family and Company-paid cell phone service. All of these payments (other than those for Mr. Blair’s administrative support services) were discontinued at the end of February 2017.

Narrative to Director Compensation Table

This section contains a description of the material terms of our compensation arrangements in effect during 2017 for those directors eligible to receive compensation.

Prior to the IPO

Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould. Each of Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould were entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $250,000 paid in quarterly installments, prorated for any partial service during any quarter. In addition, Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould received benefits as described in footnote 4 to the Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017.

Mr. Blair. As Executive Chairperson of our Board, Mr. Blair was entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $500,000 payable in quarterly installments, prorated for any partial service during any quarter. In 2017, Mr. Blair received benefits as described in footnote 4 to the Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017.

Messrs. Rhea and Schreiber. Messrs. Rhea and Schreiber were each entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $125,000 payable in quarterly installments, prorated for any partial service during any quarter.

Actions Taken in Connection with the IPO

In connection with the January 2017 grant of Incentive Units in IH6 (as defined below) and the January 2017 grant of the IH6 Bonus Awards described below under “Executive Compensation—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Incentive Units and IH6 Bonus Awards,” we granted Incentive Units in IH6 and IH6 Bonus Awards to Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould and Blair. Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould and Blair were awarded 1,250, 1,250 and 500 Incentive Units in IH6, respectively. The IH6 Bonus Award for each of Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould and Blair were in an amount equal to $500 multiplied by the number of Incentive Units in IH6 granted to such director (which was $625,000, $625,000 and $250,000, respectively) and were subject to vesting and settlement on the same terms as the IH6 Bonus Awards granted to members of management and described below under “Executive Compensation—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Incentive Units and IH6 Bonus Awards.”

20182021 Proxy Statement  2232   


Compensation of Directors(continued)

  

 

 

In February 2017,PROPOSAL NO. 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, the IH6 Bonus Awards converted into sharesBoard is submitting the selection of vested RSUsDeloitte to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will also have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

In connection with the audit of our IPO, and the following table2020 consolidated financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte, which sets forth the number and value of vested RSUs Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould and Blair received withterms by which Deloitte performed audit services for the value based on the $20.00 per share price of our common stock sold to the public in the IPO.

  

Vested RSUs Received

in Respect of IH6

Bonus Awards

Name

       (#)             ($)      

Nicholas C. Gould

 31,250 $625,000

Peter E. Gould

 31,250 $625,000

Bryce Blair

 12,500 $250,000

In addition, in connection with the IPO, all of Mr. Blair’s Incentive Units previously granted in the IH Promote Partnerships were converted into restricted shares of our common stock (“RSAs”). Similar to our executives, the shares delivered in the conversion are subject to the same vesting and other terms applicable to the corresponding Incentive Units converted. Accordingly, shares received in respect of vested Incentive Units are shares of vested common stock, and shares received in respect of unvested time-vesting and “exit-vesting” Incentive Units are shares of unvested time-vesting and exit-vesting RSAs. Mr. Blair’s unvested RSAs are scheduled to vest in full on August 1, 2018.

Company. The following table setspresents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte for the audit of our financial statements for 2020 and 2019, and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte during those periods.

  

($ in thousands)

    2020     2019 
  

Audit fees(1)

     $1,529      $1,644 
  

Audit-related fees(2)

     218      329 
  

Tax fees(3)

     266      357 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
  

Total

     $2,013      $2,330 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

        

              

(1)

Includes the aggregate audit fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the reviews of quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements.

(2)

Includes audit-related fees recognized in 2020 for professional services rendered in connection with (1) the audits of a joint venture for which we are the managing member and (2) review of prospectus information filed with the SEC related to a primary offering of our common stock and ongoing maintenance of our at-the-market equity offering program. Includes audit-related fees recognized in 2019 for professional services rendered in connection with (1) the audits of our 401(k) plan and a joint venture for which we are the managing member and (2) review of information included in other documents filed or to be filed with the SEC related to equity offerings and issuances (e.g., registration statements and prospectus information relating to secondary offerings of our common stock and our at-the-market equity offering program as well as fees related to ongoing maintenance of such equity offering programs).

(3)

Includes the aggregate tax fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All of the services covered under the captions “Audit fees,” “Audit-related fees,” and “Tax fees” were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. We paid no fees to Deloitte in 2020 or 2019 other than the Audit fees, Audit-related fees and Tax fees set forth the number and value of shares of vested common stock and shares of unvested RSAs that Mr. Blair received in exchange for all of his Incentive Units in the IH Promote Partnerships withtable above. The Audit Committee considered whether providing the value based on the $20.00 per share price of our common stock sold to the public in the IPO.

  

Vested Common

Stock Received in

Exchange for

Vested Incentive

Units

 

Unvested RSAs

Received in

Exchange for

Unvested Incentive

Units

Name

     (#)         ($)         (#)         ($)    

Bryce Blair

 777 $15,540 258 $5,160

Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould received in respect of their Incentive Units similar limited partner interests in partnerships that hold shares of our common stock, and such limited partner interests are fully vested. In addition, the holders of Class A units in the IH Holding Entities (other than Blackstone), including Messrs. Nicholas and Peter Gould, received shares of our common stock upon conversion of such units.

Mr. Blair also participated in the Supplemental Bonus Plan described below under “Executive Compensation—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Supplemental Bonus Plan” and was granted anon-discretionarynon-audit cash award based on a sharing percentage in the bonus pool in the amount of $4,997,356, as well as a discretionary cash award in the amount of $199,983. Similar to that for our NEOs (as defined below), we converted Mr. Blair’s cash payable awards into time-vesting RSUs issued under the Invitation Homes Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). The number of shares receivedservices shown in this conversiontable was determined in a manner intended to replicate the respective economic value associatedcompatible with his award under the Supplemental Bonus Plan based on the valuation derived from the IPO price,maintaining Deloitte’s independence and the number of RSUs issued in respect of his award was equal to the award amount divided by $20.00, the per share price of our common stock sold to the public in the IPO. All of Mr. Blair’snon-discretionary and discretionary Supplemental Bonus Plan RSU awards vest in three equal annual installments, with the first tranche vested on the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO, and the second and third tranches vesting, respectively on the first and second anniversaries thereafter, subject to Mr. Blair’s continued service through the applicable vesting date.

The number of RSUs initially granted to Mr. Blair in January 2017 under the Supplemental Bonus Plan was calculated erroneously and resulted in 9,119 fewer RSUs granted than intended by the Board. As a result, in March 2017, the Board granted to Mr. Blair such 9,119 additional RSUs in full satisfaction of his award under the Supplemental Bonus Plan, which RSUs have the same vesting and other terms as his initial grant.concluded that it was.

 

   2333  20182021 Proxy Statement


  CompensationProposal No. 2—Ratification of DirectorsIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm (continued)

 

 

IPO Equity AwardsPre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

UponConsistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and the consummationAudit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the IPO, we grantedindependent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established procedures relating to Ms. Searsits approval of all audit and Mr. Rhea a special equity award of 6,000non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and, 12,000 RSUs, respectively. These awards areexcept where services may be pre-approved under authority delegated by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by any independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chairperson the authority to review and pre-approve any such services between the Audit Committee’s regular meetings, and any such pre-approval will be subsequently considered and ratified by the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled to vest in full on May 24, 2018, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board until such date. Additionally, at the time of the IPO, we also granted to eachnon-employee director (other than directors affiliated with Blackstone) an annual equity-based award of 7,500 RSUs (21,875 RSUs in the case of Mr. Blair), which RSUs are scheduled to vest in full on May 24, 2018, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board until such date.meeting.

All RSUs granted to directors entitle the director to dividend equivalent payments in respect of the director’s RSUs, whether his or her RSUs unvested or vested and not yet settled. The dividend equivalents are deliverable to the director on the regular payment date that such dividends are made to the company’s stockholders and in the same form as delivered to such stockholders whether in cash or common stock.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONRATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

Members of our Compensation Committee during 2017 included Messrs. Blair, Fascitelli, Nicholas C. Gould, Harper, Kelter, Rhea, Roth and Stein. Mr. Nicholas C. Gould was formerly an officer of the Company, and Messrs. Harper, Roth and Stein are affiliates of Blackstone.

Related person transactions pursuant to Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K involving those who served on our Compensation Committee during 2017, and transactions involving Blackstone in which we participate are described in “Transactions with Related Persons.”

During fiscal 2017, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee or Board.ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2021.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  2434   


PROPOSAL NO. 3—NON-BINDING VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to stockholder vote to approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Compensation and Management Development Committee and the Board intend to carefully consider the results of this vote.

The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 3 is as follows:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information on our compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation and Management Development Committee in “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees—Compensation and Management Development Committee.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE

APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

352021 Proxy Statement


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the discussion of “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees—Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our consolidated financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed under applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

Janice L. Sears, Chairperson

Jana Cohen Barbe

J. Heidi Roizen

William J. Stein

2021 Proxy Statement36


REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation and Management Development Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors:

John B. Rhea, Chairperson

Jana Cohen Barbe

Michael D. Fascitelli

Jeffrey E. Kelter

Joseph D. Margolis

372021 Proxy Statement


  

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers.

Frederick C. Tuomi  DALLAS B. TANNER

Title:President and Chief Executive Officer

Age: 63 40

Mr. TuomiTanner has served as our President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO and a director on our Board member since November 2017, following our Merger with SWH. Mr. Tuomi served as SWH’s Chief Executive Officer from January 2016 until November 2017 and as2019. As a founding member of SWH’s Board from March 2017 to November 2017. Prior to his serviceour business, Mr. Tanner has been at SWH, Mr. Tuomi served as Co-Presidentthe forefront of CAH from March 2015 and as and Chief Operating Officer from July 2013, each until SWH’s January 2016 merger with CAH. While at CAH, Mr. Tuomi was responsible for setting its strategic direction and leadingcreating the operations of its single-family rental operations including construction/renovations, marketing, leasing, property management, asset management, human resources and information technology. Prior to joining CAH, Mr. Tuomi wasindustry. Since the founding of Invitation Homes in April 2012, he has served as Executive Vice President and President—Property ManagementChief Investment Officer, and from August 2018 to January 2019 as Interim President. Prior to our IPO in February 2017, he served on the boards of the IH Holding Entities. Mr. Tanner has almost 20 years of real estate experience through the establishment of numerous real estate platforms. In 2005, he founded Treehouse Group, for Equity Residential, which he joinedprivately sourced funds for platform investments, including single-family rental homes, multifamily properties, manufactured housing, residential land, bridge financing and property management. Mr. Tanner continues to be involved in 1994. He led the development of Equity Residential’s property management group through years of rapid growth and expansion to become the largest multifamily REITTreehouse Group’s interest in the U.S., while helping to pioneer its leading operational platform. Prior to Equity Residential,Pathfinder Ventures, a Southwest-focused commercial real estate fund. In addition, he was Presidenta partner in a successful acquisition of Residential Asset Management Group, a subsidiaryFirst Scottsdale Bank of Post Properties. Throughout his career, he hasArizona. Mr. Tanner served on numerous multifamily industry boardsthe Maricopa County (Arizona) Flood Control Board and executive committees, includingon the National Multi-Housing Council, California Housing Council, California Apartment Associationadvisory board of First Scottsdale Bank. He is actively involved in American Indian Services and the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate. Since September 2014, Mr. Tuomi has also served as a directormissionary in the Netherlands and on the Audit and Compensation Committees of Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC), a diversified real estate development and agribusiness company. Mr. Tuomi also currently serves on the Board and as Treasurer of the NRHC.Belgium.

Ernest  ERNEST M. FreedmanFREEDMAN

Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Age: 47 50

Mr. Freedman has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2015. Mr. Freedman previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“Aimco”) from 2009 to 2015. Mr. Freedman joined Aimco in 2007 as Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis and served as Senior Vice President of Finance from February 2009 to November 2009, where he was responsible for financial planning, tax, accounting and related areas. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Freedman served as Chief Financial Officer of HEI Hotels and Resorts. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Freedman was at GE Real Estate in a number of capacities, including operations controller and finance manager for investments and acquisitions. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Freedman was with Ernst & Young, LLP, including one year as a senior manager in the real estate practice. Mr. Freedman is a certified public accountant.

Mark  MARK A. SollsSOLLS

Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Age: 62 64

Mr. Solls has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since August 2015. Mr. Solls previously served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of DentalOne Partners, Inc., a dental service management organization, from August 2012 to July 2015. From April 2011 to July 2012, Mr. Solls served as a Legal Consultant to Susan G. Komen for the Cure Breast Cancer Foundation. Mr. Solls served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Concentra Inc., a healthcare management company, from August 2006 to January 2011. From September 2002 to May 2006, Mr. Solls served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Wyndham International, Inc., a leading hotel company. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Solls served as Vice President and General Counsel of DalTile International Inc., a leading manufacturer and distributor of ceramic tile.

 

2021 Proxy Statement  2538  2018 Proxy Statement


Executive Officers of the Company(continued)

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner  CHARLES D. YOUNG

Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

Age: 37

Mr. Tanner has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer since April 2012. Mr. Tanner was a founding member of Invitation Homes’ business and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Invitation Homes and, from April 2012 until our IPO, served on the Boards of the IH Holding Entities. He has over 17 years of real estate experience through the establishment of numerous real estate platforms prior to Invitation Homes. In 2005, he founded Treehouse Group, for which he privately sourced funds for platform investments, including single-family homes, multifamily properties, manufactured housing, residential land, bridge financing and property management. In addition, Mr. Tanner was a partner in a successful acquisition of First Scottsdale Bank of Arizona. He continues to represent Treehouse Group’s interest in Pathfinder Ventures, a Southwest-focused commercial real estate fund established in 2011. Mr. Tanner served on the Maricopa County Flood Control board in Phoenix, Arizona and on the advisory board of First Scottsdale Bank. He is actively involved in American Indian Services and served as a missionary in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Charles D. Young

Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Age: 49 52

Mr. Young has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since November 2017. From March 2015 until we completed the Merger, Mr. Young served as the Chief Operating Officer of SWH and, from June 2013 to March 2015 was Senior Vice President—West Division of SWAY Management LLC, SWH’s previous external manager. Mr. Young was previously the Regional Vice President, Eastern Region of Waypoint Real Estate Group HoldCo, LLC (the “Waypoint Manager”), a company he joined in 2012. Prior to joining the Waypoint Manager, Mr. Young was Executive Vice President at Mesa Development from 2003 to 2012, a national real estate developer, investor and service provider with a focus on complexmixed-use residential opportunities. Before Mesa, Mr. Young worked for Goldman, Sachs & Co. in their Real Estate Principal Investment Area (Whitehall) and Goldman’sDevelopment Investment Banking Division, infocusing on mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Young also created and managed two entrepreneurial ventures. Heco-founded and was a managing director of The Kaleidoscope Group, L.L.C., a strategic diversity and management consulting firm, and he managed K.G. Holdings, LLC, a real estate holding and management firm. Before starting his career in real estate and investment banking, Mr. Young spent several years as a professional football player in the National Football League and the World Football league. He is a member of the Floor and Décor board of directors and an independent board member of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago and a management board member of the Stanford Graduate SchoolBoard of Business.

2018 Proxy Statement26


PROPOSAL NO. 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit andNon-Audit Fees

In connection with the audit of our 2017 consolidated financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte, which sets forth the terms by which Deloitte performed audit services for the Company. The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte for the audit of our financial statements for 2017 and 2016 and for fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte during those periods.

($ in thousands)

    2017     2016 

Audit fees(1)

    $1,782     $1,671 

Audit-related fees(2)

     752      2,186 

Tax fees(3)

     255      220 

All other fees(4)

     1,586      860 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

    $4,375     $4,937 
     

 

 

     

 

 

 

(1)Includes the aggregate audit fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the reviews of quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements. The amounts included above for the year ended December 31, 2016 also include fees recognized for professional service rendered for the audits of each of the IH Holding Entities and certain of their wholly-owned subsidiaries as required by debt or other operating agreements.
(2)Includes the aggregate audit-related fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for the review of information included in our IPO registration statement, otherpre-IPO SEC filings and the registration statement relating to the Merger.
(3)Includes the aggregate tax fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4)Includes the aggregate fees recognized in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for tax advice and tax planning related to our IPO and the Merger.

The Audit Committee considered whether providing thenon-audit services shown in this table was compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence and concluded that it was.

Pre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and the Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established procedures relating to its approval of all audit andnon-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and, except where services may be preapproved under authority delegated by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and permittednon-audit services provided by any independent registered publicTrustees.

 

   2739  2018 Proxy Statement


  Proposal No. 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(continued)

accounting firm prior to each engagement. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chairperson the authority to review andpre-approve any such services between the Audit Committee’s regular meetings, and any suchpre-approval will be subsequently considered and ratified by the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018.

2018 Proxy Statement28


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under the discussion of “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees—Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by under applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Janice L. Sears, Chairperson

Richard D. Bronson

Jeffrey E. Kelter

John B. Rhea

2920182021 Proxy Statement


 

  

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION—

Emerging Growth Company Status

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, also known as the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to and rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other companies that are not emerging growth companies. Accordingly, we have included compensation information for only our principal executive officer and our two next most highly compensated executive officers serving at fiscalyear-end and have not included a compensation discussion and analysis of our executive compensation programs or tabular compensation information other than the Summary Compensation Table and the Outstanding Equity Awards table. In addition, for so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to submit certain executive compensation matters to our stockholders for advisory votes, such as“say-on-pay” and“say-on-frequency” compensation.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest to occur of: (i) December 31, 2022; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year during which our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion or more; (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion innon-convertible debt securities; or (iv) the end of any fiscal year in which we become a “large accelerated filer,” which means that we have been public for at least 12 months, have filed at least one annual report and the market value of our voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter.COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

This section provides an overview of compensation and discusses compensation policies and programs for the compensation for each principal executive officer serving during 2017 and the two other most highly compensatedfollowing executive officers serving as of December 31, 2017 (each,the Company (our named executive offices, each an “NEO” and, collectively, ourthe “NEOs”). Our 2017 NEOs were: Fredrick C. Tuomi,:

Dallas B. Tanner, our President and Chief Executive Officer, John B. Bartling Jr., former President and Chief Executive Officer; CEO;

Ernest M. Freedman, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

Mark A. Solls, our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Dallas B. Tanner,Secretary; and

Charles D. Young, our Executive Vice President and Chief InvestmentOperating Officer.

Mr. Tuomi joined the Company as our President and Chief Executive Officer on November 16, 2017 in connection with the Merger. The compensation information described below reflects what he earned or is eligible to earn for his services in such capacity and does not include compensation he earned for services for SWH prior to the Merger.

Executive Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all compensation awardedOur vision is to paidbe the premier choice in home leasing by continuously enhancing our residents’ living experience, and continuing to or earnedmake significant contributions to economic growth, job creation and the vitality of the local communities we serve. In 2020, we helped provide stability in turbulent times by delivering high-quality homes and Genuine Care to residents throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We kept residents and associates safe by reacting quickly to enhance safety protocols and leverage unique elements of our NEOsoperating platform like self-show technology. We also created solutions for services renderedresidents experiencing financial hardship by offering flexible payment plans that allowed residents to us duringcontinue enjoying the fiscal years presented.Invitation Homes living experience while meeting their lease obligations over time. See “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Response to COVID-19.” Alongside the positive impact we made with residents and communities, we delivered strong financial results for our stockholders. In successfully executing our business strategy and increasing dividends over time, we continue to achieve strong total shareholder returns (“TSR”).

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  

Salary

($)(1)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock
Awards

($)(2)

  

Option
Awards

($)

  

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)(1)(3)

  

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)(4)

  All Other
Compensation
($)
(5)
  

Total

($)

 

Frederick C. Tuomi

(President and Chief Executive Officer)

  2017  $100,822     $3,499,997     $174,394     $7,075  $3,782,288 

John B. Bartling Jr.

(Former President and Chief Executive Officer)

  2017  $721,712     $20,305,885           $7,044,245  $28,071,842 
  2016  $875,000  $30,188  $795,414     $779,489     $10,600  $2,490,691 
  2015  $875,000  $17,500  $4,235,336     $857,500     $9,865  $5,995,201 

Ernest M. Freedman

(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

  2017  $600,000     $10,833,739     $855,675     $10,800  $12,300,214 
  2016  $558,846  $28,920  $906,453     $809,383     $160,749  $2,464,351 

Dallas B. Tanner

(Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer)

  2017  $450,000     $7,651,659     $650,306     $10,731  $8,762,696 
  2016  $450,000  $450,000  $563,419     $585,047     $47,833  $2,096,299 
  2015  $387,156  $147,941  $3,970,869     $302,059     $54,248  $4,862,273 

LOGO

(1)

TSR represents growth in the value of an investment in the Company’s shares of common stock due to share price appreciation or depreciation and dividends paid, assuming the contemporaneous reinvestment of dividends on their ex-dividend dates. Data is for the period from February 1, 2017 through December 31, 2020.

The overarching goal of our executive compensation program is to motivate our leaders to achieve our key strategic priorities and focus on long-term value creation for our stockholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward for financial performance and specific business results, mitigate material risks and align with stockholder interests by having a significant portion composed of long-term equity-based awards.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  3040   


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)   

 

 

We set pay levels commensurate with performance and the need to attract and retain high quality talent, and we consider many factors in setting executive compensation, including the advice of the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s consultant, level of pay relative to the Company’s other executives, competitive market data and Company and individual performance and results.

(1)Amounts reported for Messrs. Tuomi and Bartling reflect thepro-rated portion each earned during 2017 for his services to the Company during 2017. Mr. Bartling served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from January 1, 2017 to November 16, 2017, and Mr. Tuomi commenced service as our President and Chief Executive Officer on November 16, 2017.
(2)Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards granted in 2017 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 201710-K. In accordance with the SEC’s rules, dividend equivalents that accrued on equity awards in 2017 are not reported above because dividends were factored into the grant date fair value of these awards.

As part of determining executive compensation, the Compensation and Management Development Committee reviews our goal-setting processes to ensure targets are rigorous, yet attainable, thereby incentivizing performance. In determining 2020 executive compensation, the Compensation and Management Development Committee considered a balanced mix of metrics for our annual and long-term incentive plans to measure the Company’s performance, our ESG progress, as well as individual executive performance. The Compensation and Management Development Committee also considered the impact of COVID-19 on macroeconomic conditions and ongoing changing operational realities when considering discretionary adjustments to plan design in 2020.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became apparent that one of our goals, year-over-year Same Store Core Revenue Growth, would likely not be attainable. However, at the expense of maximizing short-term revenue growth, it was critical that management demonstrate Genuine Care and Standout Citizenship by prioritizing the well-being of our residents and focusing on solutions that would increase stability and reduce the burden for residents.

Management and the Board quickly recognized the importance of helping residents navigate the crisis and believed it to be in the long-term best interests of the Company’s stockholders. Actions implemented included:

 

The grant date values reflected in the table above are in respect of: (a) the RSUs received in respect of the NEOs’ IH6 Bonus Awards; (b) RSUs received in respect of the NEOs’ Supplemental Bonus Awards; (c) the time-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting RSUs granted under our 2017 LTIP (as defined below); (d) the Retention RSUs granted to Messrs. Freedman and Tanner; and (e) the time-vesting portion of Mr. Tuomi’s sign-on equity award.

The following table includescreation of payment plans without late fees for residents experiencing financial hardship.

Strictly adhering to legislation introduced by Federal, State and local governments in response to the numberpandemic, including eviction moratoriums if certain criteria are met by residents, deferral of RSUs issuedmissed rent payments without incurring late fees, and restrictions on rent increases.

Leading with our core values of Unshakeable Integrity, Continuous Excellence, Genuine Care and Standout Citizenship, to build in flexibility with respect to eachrent collection rates and late fee enforcement, recognizing the hardships imposed by COVID-19 on our residents.

In the second quarter of these awards:

Award Type

  

Frederick C. Tuomi

(#)

   

John B. Bartling Jr.

(#)

   Ernest M. Freedman
(#)
   

Dallas B. Tanner

(#)

 

IH6 Bonus Award

       41,250    18,750    21,250 

Supplemental Bonus Award

       704,036    262,928    101,324 

2017 LTIP Award

       244,187    99,488    99,488 

Retention RSUs

           138,122    138,122 

Time-Vesting Sign-On Award

   150,927             

The 2017 LTIP Awards are the only incentive awards that are part of our regular annual compensation program. The other incentive awards reflected above were granted as a result of extraordinary events that occurred in 2017, which we do not expect to occur on a regular basis. For Additional information about these awards, see “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards” and to “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Mr. Tuomi’s Compensation—Sign-On RSU Award.”

As described further under “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Invitation Homes’ Long-Term Incentive Program,” of the 2017 LTIP PRSUs (as defined below) granted in 2017, one-third vests according to NOI Growth CAGR (as defined below), one-third vests according to AFFO Growth CAGR (as defined below) and one-third vests according to Absolute TSR CAGR (as defined below). The grant date fair value of the shares that vest according to NOI Growth CAGR and AFFO Growth CAGR were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. Assuming the highest level of performance achievement, the aggregate grant date fair value of the NOI Growth CAGR and AFFO Growth CAGR awards would have been: Mr. Bartling—$5,400,200; Mr. Freedman—$2,200,148; Mr. Tanner—$2,200,148.

As the shares that vest according to Absolute TSR CAGR are subject to market conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and are not subject to performance conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718, they have no maximum grant date fair values that differ from the grant date fair values presented in the table.

As described further under “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Mr. Tuomi’sCompensation—Sign-On RSU Award,” Mr. Tuomi’s was granted asign-on equity award in connection with his joining the Company following the Merger. Of thissign-on equity award, 50% is time-vesting and 50% is performance-vesting. The performance metrics for the performance-vesting tranche were established and approved in 2018 and thereby granted in 2018 and are, therefore, not included in the table above.

(3)Represents the annual cash incentive awards earned under annual incentive plans (as described below).
(4)We have no nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our executive officers.
(5)All Other Compensation for 2017 represents:

(a)For Mr. Bartling: cash severance amounts paid in connection with his termination; Company-paid COBRA coverage; Company-paid amounts for his accrued and unused vacation; Company-paid matching 401(k) contributions; and the incremental value under FASB ASC Topic 718 in connection with the acceleration of some of his unvested equity upon his termination. For additional information about amounts paid to and benefits received by Mr. Bartling upon his termination, see “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table” and “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”
(b)For Messrs. Freedman and Tanner: Company-paid matching 401(k) contributions.
(c)For Mr. Tuomi: Company-reimbursed cost of his housing search in connection with his relocation to Dallas, Texas.

Narrative2020, the Compensation and Management Development Committee discussed potentially modifying the annual cash incentive program framework in a variety of ways including whether to Summaryincorporate different metrics and/or revise the performance goal for the Same Store Core Revenue Growth metric. The Compensation Table

Employment Arrangements

During a portion of 2017 and priorManagement Development Committee recognized that sacrificing short-term revenue growth and instead extending extraordinary care to residents was the appropriate way for the Company to respond to the Merger,pandemic.

After careful deliberation of various alternatives for motivating and rewarding management, the Compensation and Management Development Committee decided to maintain the same goals and framework as originally approved and modestly adjust the weightings of each category to better reflect the efforts and time spent by management to successfully navigate through the pandemic. This decision resulted in an increased emphasis on AFFO per Share and Corporate Priorities, the latter which included a variety of Messrs. Bartling, Freedmanpriorities relating to community impact, COVID-19 response, and Tanner was party to an employment agreement that governed aspectsESG matters. The 0% payout under the Same Store Core Revenue Growth, as a result of the executive’s compensation during 2017. In connection withfactors noted above, still impacts the Merger, each2020 annual cash incentive though to a slightly less degree. By adopting these changes, the Compensation and Management Development Committee recognized the focus management had on protecting overall profitability and managing the key strategic priorities enabling long term growth.

The net result is an adjusted average annual cash incentive payout for our NEOs that is approximately 14% higher than the originally approved program, though still below target and the lowest bonus payout as a percentage of Messrs. Bartling, Freedmantarget in the Company’s history.

Furthermore, in contemplating the final bonus decisions for fiscal year 2020, the Compensation and Tanner entered intoManagement Development Committee considered that our NEOs would have the lowest payout as a letter agreementpercentage of target and that revised elementsthe vast majority of their compensation. In addition, in connection withour associates, Field Operations, would have the Merger, we entered into a term sheet with Mr. Tuomi that sets forth elementshighest bonus payouts as percentage of his termtarget.

Separately, the Compensation and Management Development Committee did not adjust the 2018 long-term incentive equity award program (the “2018 LTIP”) nor any of employment and compensation. The material provisions of these arrangements are described below.the outstanding long-term incentive programs.

 

   3141  20182021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

 

 

Employment Agreements with Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner

Mr. Bartling’s Employment Agreement.Mr. Bartling’s employment agreement provided for his service as President and Chief Executive Officer and that he was eligible to receive: (1) a minimum base salary of $875,000, subject to periodic increases as determined by our Board; and (2) an annual bonus award equal to 75% of his base salary if minimum performance objectives were achieved, 100% of his base salary if target performance objectives were achieved and up to a maximum of 125% of his base salary for top performance. Mr. Bartling’s employment agreement also provided that Mr. Bartling was entitled to participate in allSome of our employee benefit plans onkey business results for 2020 were:

$1.08(1)

Adjusted Funds from Operation (“AFFO”) per share, up 4.6% year-over-year.

On a Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) basis, $0.35 net income per diluted common share.

Enhanced Resident Loyalty

Record-high 4.6 (out of 5) average resident satisfaction survey score and Net Promoter Score (“NPS”) of 45 for full-year 2020; continued rollout of resident-friendly and environmentally friendly ancillary services, including Smart Home and HVAC filter delivery.

3.7%(2)(3)

Same Store NOI Growth year-over-year.

On a GAAP basis, 34.9% net income available to common stockholders growth year-over-year.

Social Impact

Provided flexible payment plans to thousands of residents to ease financial hardship related to the COVID-19 pandemic and introduced new associate training programs and benefits, including paid parental leave and flexible work programs.

97.5%

Same Store average occupancy, driven by year-over-year reductions in Same Store turnover rate from 29.7% to 26.1% and in Same Store days to re-resident from 46 days to 36 days.

Leverage Reduction

Reduction in net debt / annualized Adjusted EBITDAre(4) from 8.1x at December 31, 2019 to 7.3x at December 31, 2020.

(1)

See Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures” in our 2020 Form 10-K for the reconciliation of AFFO to net income (loss) (as determined in accordance with GAAP), the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

(2)

Same Store NOI Growth is defined as the percentage year-over-year change in Net Operating Income (“NOI”) from our Same Store portfolio where NOI is calculated as described in our 2020 Form 10-K under Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures.” See Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures” in our 2020 Form 10-K for the reconciliation of Same Store NOI to net income (loss) (as determined in accordance with GAAP), the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

(3)

“Same Store” is defined in our 2020 Form 10-K under “Defined Terms.”

(4)

See Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures” in our 2020 Form 10-K for the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAre to net income (loss) (as determined in accordance with GAAP), the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

We maintain strong governance standards in the same basis as those made available to our other senior executives. Mr. Bartling’s employment agreement (other than the covenants, which were incorporated into the Invitation Homes Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) for such executive) was terminated in June 2017 in connection with our adoption of the Severance Plan.

Mr. Freedman’s Employment Agreement. Mr. Freedman’s employment agreement provided for his service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and that he was eligible to receive: (1) a minimum base salary of $500,000, subject to periodic increases as determined by our Board; and (2) an annual bonus award equal to 150% of his base salary if target performance objectives were achieved and no annual bonus award if minimum performance objectives were not achieved. The employment agreement also provided that Mr. Freedman was also entitled to participate in alloversight of our employee benefit plans on the same basis as those made available to our other senior executives. The employment agreement provided that Mr. Freedman was to be granted equity interests in the IH Promote Partnerships on terms substantially similar to our other senior executives, with the intention that the Incentive Units granted to Mr. Freedman have an aggregate target exit value of $5 million. Mr. Freedman’s employment agreement (other than the covenants, which were incorporated into the Severance Plan for such executive) was terminated in June 2017 in connection with our adoption of the Severance Plan.

Mr. Tanner’s Employment Agreement.Mr. Tanner’s employment agreement provided for his service as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and that he was eligible to receive: (1) a minimum base salary of $450,000, subject to increase but not decrease, as determined by our Board; and (2) an annual bonus award equal to 125% of his base salary if target performance objectives were achieved, with no annual bonus award if minimum performance objectives were not achieved. Mr. Tanner was also eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans on the same basis as the benefits are generally made available to our other senior executives. Mr. Tanner’s employment agreement (other than the covenants, which were incorporated into the Severance Plan for such executive) was terminated in June 2017 in connection with our adoption of the Severance Plan.

Post-IPO Compensation Decisions Modifying Terms of Employment Agreements

As part of our annual compensation-setting process, and in connection with our transition from being privately held to publicly traded, in March 2017, the Compensation Committee adjusted the annual base salary of Mr. Bartling from $875,000 to $800,000 effective as of April 1, 2017. In addition, the Compensation Committee adjusted the target annual bonus award opportunity that each of Messrs. Bartling and Freedman could earn under the 2017 AIP (described below), such that Mr. Bartling’s target annual bonus award opportunity was increased from 100% to 125%, and Mr. Freedman’s target annual bonus award opportunity was decreased from 150% to 125%.

Merger-Related Letter Agreements with Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner

In contemplation of the Merger, in August 2017, we entered into letter agreements with each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner, which became effective on November 16, 2017 upon the consummation of the Merger (the “Letter Agreements”). The Letter Agreements were intended to provide these executives with specified benefits as the Merger did not constitute a “change in control” or an “exit event” as defined under any of our compensatory or benefit plans or arrangements,executive compensation programs, including the Incentive Plan or the Severance Plan.

Under the Letter Agreement with Mr. Bartling, if Mr. Bartling’s employment was terminated by us without “cause” or by him upon a “constructive termination” (each as definedfollowing policies and practices that were in the Severance Plan) within 24 months following (or 90 days prior to) the Merger closing date, he would be entitled to receive benefits under the Severance Plan as though the Merger constituted a change in control, entitling Mr. Bartling to receive: (1) alump-sumpro-rata cash bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance; (2) a cash severance payment in the amount of three times the sum of (x) his base salary and (y) bonus based on target performance (payable over 24 months instead of in alump-sum); (3) a cash payment equal to the total amount of monthly COBRA insurance premiums for participation in our welfare benefit programs for 18 months following his termination; and (4) accelerated vesting of any outstanding RSUs granted under the Incentive Plan on or prior to February 6, 2017 (which constituted 421,266 RSUs granted under the Supplementaleffect during 2020.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  3242   


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)   

 

 

Bonus Plan establishedStrong Compensation Governance

The Compensation and Management Development Committee oversees the executive compensation program and evaluates the program against competitive practices, legal and regulatory development and corporate governance trends. The Compensation and Management Development Committee has incorporated the following market-leading governance features into our program.

What We Do:

What We Don’t Do:

LOGO     The majority of our executive compensation is performance-based and at-risk, tied to rigorous absolute and relative performance goals;

LOGO

No employment agreements or individual change in control agreements;
LOGOWe utilize a balanced mix of metrics for our annual and long-term incentive plans to measure the Company’s performance;

LOGO

We do not encourage excessive risk taking (we conduct annual formal enterprise risk assessments);
LOGOWe have implemented a clawback policy for long-term incentive awards to allow for the Company to seek reimbursement from our senior executives;

LOGO

We do not authorize excise tax gross-ups;
LOGOWe have a stock ownership policy for our executive officers and non-employee directors; and

LOGO

We prohibit hedging and restrict pledging or borrowing against Company stock; and
LOGOWe engage an independent compensation consultant that does not provide any other consulting or other services to the Company.

LOGO

Generally, we have no executive-only perquisites such as company cars, security systems or financial planning.

2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

As discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, we actively engage with our stockholders, seek their input and address questions and concerns. We maintain an open line of communication with investors on our compensation philosophy and practices and have consistently received say-on-pay support from our stockholders. The 2020 annual vote on an advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our NEOs passed with over 90% of the votes in favor. Even though we received a high level of support for our executive compensation programs, during 2020, outreach to our stockholders remained a top priority for our Board and our senior management team.

Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

Our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy is set by the Compensation and Management Development Committee. Our goal is to provide compensation and incentives designed to attract and retain key executives with the qualifications to manage and lead the Company as well as to motivate them to develop professionally, contribute to the achievement of our financial goals and ultimately create and grow our equity value. Our compensation philosophy aligns our executives with our growth objectives via equity compensation and annual incentive compensation, the value of which is driven by our performance over the long and short term, respectively. All of our NEOs maintain a significant equity stake in the Company.

To achieve these objectives, we provide executive pay programs that:

Deliver competitive levels of compensation to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executives;

Foster a strong relationship between stockholder value and executive compensation by having a significant portion of compensation composed of long-term incentive awards;

Emphasize performance-based compensation contingent upon achieving financial and business area performance goals; and

Promote our core values: Unshakable Integrity; Genuine Care; Continuous Excellence; and Standout Citizenship.

432021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

When designing the Company’s executive compensation plans and making individual compensation decisions, the Compensation and Management Development Committee considers several key principles:

Cultivate long-term value creation without taking unnecessary risks;

Combine both short- and long-term compensation to promote retention and create a pay-for-performance environment;

Emphasize at-risk pay over fixed pay, yet create a positive work environment that rewards long-term achievements; and

Motivate and reward for successfully executing our business strategies.

Determination of Compensation

Independent Review and Approval of Executive Compensation

The Compensation and Management Development Committee oversees and approves key aspects of executive compensation, including salaries, corporate goals and individual objectives, payouts under the annual cash incentive plan, and the size and structure of long-term incentive awards for our NEOs. The Compensation and Management Development Committee approves objectives designed to align executive pay with Company performance and stockholder interests and also seeks to provide competitive pay opportunities tied to performance and designed to retain talent, maximize stockholder value and mitigate material risk.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee does not delegate any substantive responsibility related to the compensation of NEOs and exercises its independent judgment when approving executive compensation. No member of the Compensation and Management Development Committee is a former or current officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. They are all independent under current NYSE listing standards.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee takes into account the aggregate amount and mix of all components of compensation when considering compensation decisions affecting the CEO and other NEOs. The Compensation and Management Development Committee considers many factors, including the advice of its independent compensation consultant, competitive market data, level of pay relative to the Company’s other executives, and the alignment of the Company’s total pay opportunity and pay outcomes with performance.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee conducts an annual evaluation process of the CEO. The Compensation and Management Development Committee determines and approves the annual salary, bonus, equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the CEO. The CEO does not have a role in and is not present during discussions regarding his own compensation. The CEO traditionally has a role in setting the compensation for other NEOs by providing recommendations to the Compensation and Management Development Committee. The Compensation and Management Development Committee has the discretion to accept, reject or modify the CEO’s recommendations.

The Role of the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s Independent Consultant

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has sole authority under its charter to retain advisors and consultants as it deems appropriate. The Compensation and Management Development Committee has retained FPL, a nationally recognized leader in advising public REITs on executive compensation and related matters, as its compensation consultant.

FPL attends Compensation and Management Development Committee meetings, reviews compensation data with the Compensation and Management Development Committee and participates in general discussions regarding executive compensation issues. FPL reports to the Compensation and Management Development Committee, and only at the timeCompensation and Management Development Committee’s direction, will work with management to develop materials and analyses essential to the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s executive compensation evaluations and determination. Such materials include competitive market assessments.

FPL regularly participates in executive sessions with the Compensation and Management Development Committee (without any of the Company’s personnel or executives present) to discuss compensation matters. FPL does not provide any other services to the Company and has no other direct or indirect business relationships with the Company. Taking these and other factors into account, the Compensation and Management Development Committee has determined that the work performed by FPL does not raise any conflicts of interest.

2021 Proxy Statement44


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Use of Peer Data

We are always competing for the best talent in the marketplace. Accordingly, the Compensation and Management Development Committee regularly reviews market data and pay practices and ranges of our IPO). Mr. Bartling’s termination in connection“peer” companies to ensure that we continue to offer a relevant and competitive executive pay program each year. The Compensation and Management Development Committee believes this allows the Company to successfully attract and retain the high-quality executive talent critical to the Company’s long-term success.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee reviews the potential total compensation package for each of the executive officers against a pre-selected peer group, consisting of other publicly traded REITs, based on data compiled by FPL. Consistent with the Merger entitled him to the foregoing benefits. For additional information about payments and benefits Mr. Bartling received in connection with his termination, see “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”

The Letter Agreements with Messrs. Freedman and Tanner provide that, each of such executive’s 69,061 Retention RSUs (as described below) that were scheduled to cliff-vest on June 19, 2022 will instead vest on the date that is 18 months from the closing dateobjectives of the Merger, subject to the executive’s continued employment through that date. If the executive’s employment is earlier terminated by us without “cause” or by theCompany’s executive upon a “constructive termination” (each as defined in the applicable award agreement for the Retention RSUs), the Retention RSUs will vest on the termination date. In addition, under each of Messrs. Freedman’s and Tanner’s Letter Agreements, upon a termination of the executive’s employment by us without “cause” or by the executive upon a “constructive termination” (each as defined in the Severance Plan), the executive’s then-unvested Supplemental Bonus RSUs (as described below) granted pursuant to awards under our Supplemental Bonus Plan established at the time of our IPO, will vest. For additional information about payments and benefits to which Messrs. Freedman and Tanner may be entitled upon qualifying employment termination events or a change in control, see “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”

Except as provided in the Letter Agreements, Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner were not entitled to any additional or accelerated payments or benefits as a result of the Merger.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards

Invitation Homes’ 2017 AIP

As part of our annual compensation program, the Compensation and Management Development Committee compares executive officer compensation against these peer companies to ensure that the Company attracts and retains highly qualified executive officers by providing a total executive compensation package that is competitive with those provided by the Company’s peers.

FPL assists the Compensation and Management Development Committee in selecting the Company’s peer group. Because there is only one public, single-family rental focused REIT of comparable size to us, only one of our direct competitors is appropriate for inclusion in our compensation peer group. To create a sufficiently robust data set by which to examine market competitive pay practices, FPL and the Compensation and Management Development Committee selected other peers based on the following primary factors: (i) focus on residential operations; (ii) similarity of size in terms of total market capitalization (between 0.5x-2.0x of our total market capitalization and such that we rank near the median of the peer group); and/or (iii) a national presence. Based on all of the foregoing factors, FPL recommended no change in peer group for 2020 and the Compensation and Management Development Committee approved the following peer group of REITs for competitive analyses of compensation that informed decisions on pay opportunities for our NEOs:

Peer Company Name

Asset Focus

American Homes 4 Rent

Single-Family Rental

Apartment Investment and Management Company

Multifamily

AvalonBay Communities, Inc.

Multifamily

Boston Properties, Inc.

Office

Camden Property Trust

Multifamily

Digital Realty Trust, Inc.

Specialty

Equity Residential

Multifamily

Essex Property Trust, Inc.

Multifamily

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Self-Storage

Healthpeak Properties, Inc.

Health Care

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.

Multifamily

Realty Income Corporation

Diversified

Regency Centers Corporation

Shopping Center

Sun Communities, Inc.

Specialty

UDR, Inc.

Multifamily

In 2020, the Compensation and Management Development Committee reviewed compensation data for executives at the peer companies with positions comparable to those held by the NEOs. This data consisted of base salary, annual cash incentives, and equity award information (the latter two components on an actual and target basis), paid by each of the peer companies based on public filings as well as FPL’s proprietary database, which also includes data from the Nareit Compensation Survey (which FPL conducts). FPL’s analysis concluded that the peer companies generally have compensation programs comparable to ours, with annual bonuses typically in the form of cash and long-term compensation typically in the form of both performance vesting and time vesting equity awards. The Compensation and Management Development Committee generally uses the median levels of compensation within the peer group as an initial point of reference for setting pay and uses the market data provided by the peer group as one of several reference points useful for determining the form and amount of compensation; however, the Compensation and Management Development Committee does not specifically target a percentile for benchmarking purposes and actual

452021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

compensation paid may fluctuate above/below the median of the peer group based on the Company’s performance and achievement of the goals established by the Compensation and Management Development Committee for the executive officers. The Compensation and Management Development Committee expects to review the peer group periodically and make changes as warranted and deemed appropriate.

Elements of Compensation

Our compensation program is heavily weighted towards performance-based compensation, reflecting our philosophy of increasing the long-term value of the Company and supporting strategic and operational objectives.

For 2020, the compensation framework had three main compensation program elements that assessed performance across a variety of goals and measured performance across an annual and multi-year performance period while preserving a substantial emphasis on performance-based pay. The performance-based components include a threshold, target and maximum opportunity for the annual cash incentive award and the performance vesting RSUs. The table below contains a design overview of the 2020 executive compensation program.

Element

Form

Metrics and Weighting

Base Salary

Fixed Cash

Fixed rate of pay utilized to attract and retain executives

Annual Cash

Incentive

Performance-Based
Cash

90% Corporate financial objectives (including AFFO per share and Same Store Core Revenue Growth year-over-year)(1), defined corporate priorities (including enhanced resident loyalty, development of Company leaders, enhanced community impact, driving shareholder engagement and returns, and response to COVID-19 pandemic with a strong focus on associate and resident safety and business continuity) and defined business unit and operational objectives

10% Individual performance goals

Long-Term

Incentive

Award

Performance Vesting
RSUs

75% Forward-looking three-year performance period in which awards may be earned based 45% upon the compounded, annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of the Company’s TSR relative to the MSCI US REIT Index (the “TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR”) and 30% upon Same Store NOI Growth CAGR; if earned at the end of the performance period, awards will be eligible to vest on the Certification Date (as defined below); if three-year absolute TSR is negative, TSR metric is capped at target

Time Vesting RSUs

25% Awards vest ratably over three years

(1)

See “Annex A: Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for reconciliation of Total Revenues to Same Store Total Revenues and Same Store Core Revenues, full year.

Alignment of Pay with Performance

Our executive compensation program provides significant alignment between pay and performance by linking a meaningful portion of total compensation to the achievement of operational and strategic goals through our short-term incentive program, as well as rigorous relative shareholder return goals through our long-term incentive program.

In 2020, approximately 70% of our CEO’s total target compensation and approximately 65% of our other NEOs’ total target compensation was at-risk and not guaranteed and 30% and 35%, respectively, was fixed (including base salary and time-based RSU grants, the latter of which vest over a three-year period, with the ultimate value subject to our share performance). To build even stronger pay-for-performance alignment with our stockholders, long-term incentive awards are predominantly “at-risk” performance-based equity awards, the ultimate value of which depends entirely on the Company’s future relative total shareholder return and three-year Same Store NOI growth. The following diagrams present the allocation of total pay among different components of our executive compensation program for our CEO and the weighted-average of each component for our other NEOs as a group.

2021 Proxy Statement46


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

2020 Target Pay Mix – CEO

2020 Target Pay Mix – Other NEOs (Avg.)

LOGO

LOGO

Base Salary

Base salary compensates our NEOs for performing the requirements of their positions and provides them with a level of cash income predictability and stability with respect to a portion of their total compensation. The Compensation and Management Development Committee believes that base salaries for our NEOs should reflect market competitive levels of pay and factors unique to each executive such as experience and breadth of responsibilities, performance, individual skill set, time in the role and pay relative to peers within the Company. The Compensation and Management Development Committee increased Mr. Tanner’s base salary in 2020 from $700,000 to $800,000, and Mr. Solls’ base salary from $450,000 to $475,000 to reflect their performance in line with the market competitive levels.

Base salaries for the NEOs as of December 31, 2019 and 2020 are as follows:

 

Name

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

2020

 

  

 

% Change     

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

$

 

 

700,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

800,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

14%

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

 

$

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

  0%

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

575,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

575,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

  0%

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

$

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

  6%

 

2020 Annual Cash Incentive Program

In 2020, our NEOs participated in an annual cash incentive plan forprogram under which each of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 (the “2017 AIP”)executives was eligible to reward eligible employees for their successfulreceive an annual cash incentive based upon the achievement of financial andnon-financialcertain performance criteria. The goals aligned with our goals and approved a mixwere comprised of corporate financial objectives,goals, which were shared by all NEOs, and business unit goals for all NEOs (other than Mr. Tanner, who as our CEO did not have a single business unit to oversee), which were unique to each executive. These goals were pre-established, with the majority measured objectively. Each executive was also assigned individual goals for 2020.

Each of Messrs. Tanner’s, Freedman’s, Young’s and operational objectives,Solls’ total award opportunity under the 2020 annual cash incentive program was designed to be based on the financial, corporate priorities and individual performance goals.objectives as set forth below:

                                                                                                                                
  

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

AFFO per Share

 

 

 

35%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

Same Store Core Revenue Growth year-over-year

 

 

 

35%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

Corporate Priorities

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

20%

 

 

Business Unit Goals and Objectives

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

20%

 

 

Individual Goals and Objectives

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

10%

 

472021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

The corporate financial objectives under the 2017 AIP2020 annual cash incentive program consisted of: (1) Total AFFO per Shareshare (“AFFO per Share,” where AFFO and FFO are calculated as described in our 20172020 Form 10-K;10-K, under Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures”); and (2) Same Store Net Operating IncomeCore Revenue Growth (“NOI Growth,” defined as the percentage year-over-year change in Net Operating Income in ouryear-over-year. See “Annex A: Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for reconciliation of Total Revenues to Same Store portfolio where Net Operating Income is calculatedTotal Revenues and Same Store Core Revenues, full year. The corporate priorities under the 2020 annual cash incentive program consisted of: (1) an enhanced resident loyalty, which was scored based on NPS, as describedwell as expansion of ancillary services for our residents; (2) development of Company leaders, which was based on a plan to ensure all leaders complete required training, and development of our Company’s D&I strategy; (3) enhanced community care, which was scored based on the identification of our Company’s signature social purpose, preparation for its launch in 2021 and the dissemination of our 201710-K); (3) Relative Net Effective Rental Growth (based on renewal and new lease growth for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2016 through the third fiscal quarter of 2017, relativecommunity impact to our two largest single-family rental peer companies determinedmarket offices (4) driving shareholder engagement and return, which was scored based on (i) days-to-re-resident, and (ii) the development of our corporate ESG strategy; and (5) the establishment and operation of a company-wide COVID-19 taskforce, focusing on ensuring the safety and health of our associates and residents while enabling business continuity, which was added to corporate priorities mid-year.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee established specific performance goals within each of the above corporate metrics that contained a defined threshold (50%), target (100%), and maximum (150%) opportunity. Our target level generally aligned with our budget, with a bandwidth from target in which the maximum opportunity requires a high degree of performance. Annual cash incentive scores were interpolated on a straight-line basis based on actual achievement between the threshold, target and maximum levels with no payout for any performance measure that did not achieve the threshold.The diagrams below illustrate the specific goals across each corporate metric, which were established at the beginning of the performance period); and (4) a resident satisfaction score (derived from resident surveys based on2020, as well as our Net Promoter Score methodology).

Each of Messrs. Bartling’s, Freedman’s and Tanner’s total award opportunity under the 2017 AIP was based on the financial, corporate and individual objectives as set forth below:actual results.

 

  

John B. Bartling

(Former
President and Chief

Executive Officer)

  

Ernest M. Freedman

(Executive Vice

President and Chief

Financial Officer)

  

Dallas B. Tanner

(Executive Vice

President and Chief

Investment Officer)

 

AFFO per Share

  30  22  11

NOI Growth

  25  19  9

Relative Net Effective Rental Growth

  17  13  7

Resident Satisfaction Score

  8  6  3

Corporate Priorities

  10  10  10

Business Unit and Operational Objectives

     20  50

Individual Goals

  10  10  10

Each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner was eligible to receive a payout under the 2017 AIP based on the level of the actual achievement of the above-described performance measures, and payouts were expressed as a percentage of such executive’s base salary in effect at fiscalyear-end. Each of Messrs. Bartling’s, Freedman’s and Tanner’s target bonus opportunity was established under the terms of his respective employment agreement, as may have been subsequently adjusted.

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

 

2021 Proxy Statement  3348  2018 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

 

 

AtBusiness unit goals for Messrs. Freedman, Young and Solls were tied to the beginningstrategic initiatives each business unit was focused on for the fiscal year. For leaders who run multiple business units, an average of their scores is reflected. For example, Mr. Freedman’s goals included a combination of the 2017 AIPbusiness units which report into him or over which he has administrative oversight: Accounting, Financial Planning and Quantitative Analysis, Internal Audit, Investor Relations and Project Management. Business unit goals addressed growth and development areas specific to each leader, such as financial goals, culture, project-based goals and talent and leadership development.

Mr. Tanner had individual goals which made up 10% of his 2020 Annual Cash Incentive. His goals were tied to five key categories: strategy and vision, leadership, organization and management development, external relationships and response to COVID-19. The first included goals to develop a plan to deepen scale in high-growth markets, evolve the resident lifestyle, embrace innovation to create efficiencies in processes and lead the development of a long-term ESG strategy. The second, leadership category, was to drive a culture that cultivates an environment in which the organization is positioned for growth, focused on value creation and is “Ready to Run.” The third, organization and management development category, included ensuring the Company has the diverse talent pipeline necessary to deliver upon our multi-year strategic plan and being an active voice and sponsor in the creation of our D&I strategy. Next, external relationships included the goal to build strong relationships with key stakeholders via participation in panels and forums to increase awareness of the single-family rental industry. Lastly, COVID-19 response included leading the Company through the pandemic with a strong focus on associate and resident health and well-being, as well as business continuity.

For Messrs. Freedman, Young and Solls, individual goals were aligned with their respective business units’ goals, including financial performance, period, each performance measure was assigned a scale that,project-based milestones, optimization of processes, associate development and engagement, resident satisfaction and COVID-19 response.

Business unit (except for Operations) and individual goal scores were based on actual achievementa subjective assessment range of 1-5. In the case of Operations, business unit goal scores were based on operational metric performance vs. target including: net effective rental rate growth (as defined in our 2020 Form 10-K under “Defined Terms”), net total cost to maintain (represents the sum of recurring repairs and maintenance and recurring turnover expenses net of resident reimbursements and recurring capital expenditures), days to re-resident (as defined in our 2020 Form 10-K under “Defined Terms”) and net retention rate (represents the percentage of lease expiration count (net) in which the resident occupies the home for at least two months after the end of the performance period, yielded a bonus score. The resulting bonus score for each performance measure was then multiplied by the percentage of the total award opportunity that performance measure represented to arrive at an achievement factor. The sum of the achievement factors was then multiplied by the executive’s award opportunity payable at target to determine the payout amount such executive was entitled to receive under the 2017 AIP.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the scaleexpiration month). All metrics were for the AFFO per Share performance measure provided for a bonus score of 50% if the AFFO per Share achieved was at least $0.77, a bonus score of 100% if the AFFO per Share achieved was between $0.82 - $0.85 and a 150% bonus score if the AFFO per Share was $0.90 or more. The scale for the NOI Growth performance measure provided for a bonus score of 50% if the NOI Growth achieved was at least 5.8%, a bonus score of 100% if NOI Growth achieved was between 7.0% - 7.6% and a 150% bonus score if the NOI was 8.8% or more. The scale for Relative Net Effective Rental Growth performance measure provided for a bonus score of 50% if the Relative Net Effective Rental Growth achieved was at least 100 basis points underperformance relative to our two largest single-family rental peer companies, a bonus score of 100% if the Relative Net Effective Rental Growth achieved was at least 25 basis points outperformance relative to our two largest single-family rental peer companies and a 150% bonus score if the Relative Net Effective Rental Growth achieved was 150 basis points outperformance relative to our two largest single-family rental peer companies. The scale for the Resident Satisfaction performance measure provided for a bonus score of 50% if the score achieved was at least 26, a bonus score of 100% if the Resident Satisfaction achieved was at least 28 and a 150% bonus score if the Resident Satisfaction was 30 or more. BonusSame Store portfolio. Annual cash incentive scores were interpolated on a straight linestraight-line basis based on actual achievement between the threshold, target and maximum levels with no payout for any performance measure that did not achieve the threshold.

For 2017: AFFO per Share achieved was $0.87,As referenced in “Executive Compensation”—“Compensation Discussion and Analysis”—“Executive Summary,” primarily due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and prudent reprioritization of the Company’s areas of focus in light of the pandemic, the Company did not meet the performance targets for year-over-year Same Store Core Revenue Growth, resulting in a 120% bonus score; NOI0% payout. The pandemic resulted in deterioration of macroeconomic conditions and disruption to the health, financial and social wellbeing of many individuals, including the Company’s residents. Management and the Board recognized the importance of helping residents navigate the crisis and believed it to be in the long-term best interest of stockholders for the Company to prioritize solutions that increased stability and reduced burden for residents at the expense of maximizing short-term revenue growth. As previously noted, these solutions included the creation of payment plans without late fees for residents experiencing financial hardship. Many local, state and federal governments shared the Company’s conviction in the importance of helping individuals navigate the crisis, and the Company strictly adhered to legislation introduced by these governing bodies in response to the pandemic. These pandemic-related factors outside of the Company’s control and the corresponding response from the Company to lead with its core values of Genuine Care and Standout Citizenship directly impacted several key drivers of Same Store Revenue Growth, achievedincluding rent collection rates, late fee enforcement and rental rate growth. In recognizing that sacrificing short-term revenue growth to extend extraordinary care to residents was 7.4%, resulting in 100% bonus score; Relative Net Effective Rental Growth achieved was 58 basis points, resulting in a 113% bonus score;the appropriate way for the Company to respond to the pandemic, the Compensation and Resident Satisfaction achieved was 28, resulting in a 100% bonus score.

Based on Messrs. Bartling’s, Freedman’s and Tanner’s corporate priorities, departmental and individual goals achieved underManagement Development Committee utilized discretion to modify the 2017 AIP,weightings of the short-term incentive compensation plan accordingly. The table below reflects the adjusted 2020 annual cash incentive awards thereunder were payable as follows, which amounts are reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table (other thanprogram objectives for Mr. Bartling).our NEOs.

 

Name

 

Target Award

(% of FYE
Base Salary)

  FYE Base
Salary
  

Combined Achievement

Factor Under the

2017 AIP

(% of Target Award)

  

Amounts Earned

Under 2017 AIP

($)

 

John B. Bartling Jr.(1)

  125 $800,000   N/A  $N/A     

Ernest M. Freedman

  125 $600,000   114.1 $855,675 

Dallas B. Tanner

  125 $450,000   115.6 $650,306 

(1)As a result of Mr. Bartling’s termination, he was not eligible to receive a payout under the 2017 AIP, however, pursuant to the terms of his Letter Agreement (described above), he received a prorated cash bonus based on actual performance in 2017, which bonus was $1,069,236, (the same prorated amount he would have received under the 2017 AIP). This amount is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

Incentive Units and IH6 Bonus Awards

Prior to the completion of our IPO, our business was owned by six holding entities and, pursuant to ourpre-IPO long-term promoted interest incentive plan, members of management, including each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner, had been granted long-term incentive awards in the form of equity interests in Invitation Homes L.P. (“IH1”); Preeminent Parent L.P. and Invitation Homes2-A L.P. (collectively, the “IH2 Promote Partnerships”); Invitation Homes 3 L.P. (“IH3”); Invitation Homes 4 L.P. (“IH4”); Invitation Homes 5 L.P. (“IH5”); and Invitation Homes 6 L.P. (“IH6,” and, together with IH1, the IH2 Promote Partnerships, IH3, IH4 and IH5, the “IH Promote Partnerships”). The Incentive Units included “time-vesting” awards subject to vesting terms based on the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, as well as “exit-vesting” awards subject to vesting terms based on the first to occur of (x) the date Blackstone ceased to be the beneficial owner of at least 15% of the outstanding equity capital of the applicable Promote Partnership (or, following the IPO, the date Blackstone and its affiliates ceased to own 15% or more of our common stock) and (y) if an initial public offering has occurred, the date that is 18 months after the consummation of the initial public offering (each an “exit event”).

2018 Proxy Statement34


Executive Compensation(continued)

In January 2017, we granted management, including Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner, Incentive Units in IH6 and bonus payments (“IH6 Bonus Awards”). The Incentive Units in IH6 consisted of time-vesting units that were generally subject to vesting terms based on the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date and exit-vesting units that were subject to vesting upon an exit event. Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner were awarded 1,650, 750 and 850 Incentive Units in IH6, respectively. Each of Messrs. Bartling’s and Freedman’s Incentive Units in IH6 were scheduled to vest based on a September 1, 2015 vesting reference date, and Mr. Tanner’s Incentive Units in IH6 were fully vested upon grant. The IH6 Bonus Awards consisted of a bonus award in an amount equal to $500 multiplied by the total number of Incentive Units in IH6 granted to the executive (which were, for Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner, $825,000, $375,000 and $425,000, respectively).

In January 2017, Mr. Freedman was granted additional Incentive Units in IH1, the IH2 Promote Partnerships and IH3 in order to provide Mr. Freedman with the remainder of the equity awards he was originally intended to receive. Mr. Freedman was granted 85 Incentive Units in IH1, 100 Units in the IH2 Promote Partnerships and 2.5 Incentive Units in IH3. The vesting and other terms of these Incentive Units were the same as those for his existing Incentive Units in IH1 and IH3, respectively, including the vesting reference date applicable to such Incentive Units. As a result, all Incentive Units granted to Mr. Freedman in IH1, the IH2 Promote Partnerships and IH3 were scheduled to vest based on an October 14, 2015 vesting reference date.

In connection with our IPO, we converted all of the Incentive Units held by our executive officers (other than the Incentive Units in IH1, the IH2 Promote Partnerships, IH3, IH4 and IH5 held by Mr. Tanner) into shares of our common stock. The number of shares received in this conversion was determined in a manner intended to replicate the respective economic value associated with the corresponding Incentive Units converted based on the valuation derived from the IPO price. The vesting and other terms of the shares delivered in the conversion have the same vesting and other terms applicable to the corresponding Incentive Units converted. Accordingly, shares received in respect of vested Incentive Units were to be shares of vested common stock, and shares received in respect of unvested time-vesting and exit-vesting Incentive Units were to be shares of unvested time-vesting and exit-vesting restricted stock. Mr. Tanner received in respect of his Incentive Units in IH1, the IH2 Promote Partnerships, IH3, IH4 and IH5 similar vested limited partner interests in the partnerships that hold shares of our common stock, and Mr. Tanner’s Incentive Units in IH6 were converted into shares of our common stock in the same manner as that for Incentive Units held by our other executives as described above. Individual holders of Class A units in the IH Promote Partnerships, including Mr. Tanner, received shares of our common stock upon conversion of such units. As a result of the valuation in the IPO, Messrs. Bartling and Freedman received no vested common stock in exchange for their Incentive Units, and Mr. Tanner received no vested common stock in exchange for his Incentive Units in IH6.

The IH6 Bonus Awards vested upon the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO and were settled in vested RSUs, with the number of RSUs awarded calculated by dividing the total dollar amount of the IH6 Bonus Award by $20.00, the per share price of our common stock sold to the public in the IPO. Such RSUs have been issued under our Incentive Plan and were delivered to these executives in August 2017. The following table sets forth the number and value of vested RSUs Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner received in respect of their IH6 Bonus Awards.

  Vested RSUs Received in Respect of IH6 Bonus Awards 

Name

         (#)                  ($)         

John B. Bartling Jr.

  41,250  $825,000 

Ernest M. Freedman

  18,750  $375,000 

Dallas B. Tanner

  21,250  $425,000 

Supplemental Bonus Plan

In October 2016, we established a supplemental bonus plan for several key executives and employees, including Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner, which plan was further modified in connection with the IPO (the “Supplemental Bonus Plan”). Under this Supplemental Bonus Plan, we established a pool, and each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner shared in this pool, along with other members of management. We refer to these as thenon-discretionary awards, and the amount ofnon-discretionary awards received by each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner was approximately $11.0 million, $3.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively (the“Non-Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award”). In addition, the Compensation Committee made additional discretionary awards to Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner and others in an amount that was not to exceed in the aggregate $10.0 million. We refer to these as the discretionary awards, and the amount of discretionary awards received by each of Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and

                                                                                                                                
  

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

AFFO per Share

 

 

 

47.5%

 

 

 

42.5%

 

 

 

37.5%

 

 

 

42.5%

 

 

Same Store Core Revenue Growth year-over-year

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

Corporate Priorities

 

 

 

   30%

 

 

 

   20%

 

 

 

   20%

 

 

 

   20%

 

 

Business Unit Goals and Objectives

 

 

 

  N/A

 

 

 

   15%

 

 

 

   20%

 

 

 

   15%

 

 

Individual Goals and Objectives

 

 

 

   10%

 

 

 

   10%

 

 

 

   10%

 

 

 

   10%

 

 

   3549  20182021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

 

 

In February 2021, the Compensation and Management Development Committee determined the results of the individual performance objectives for Mr. Tanner. Individual performance goals for each other NEO other than himself were reviewed and scored by Mr. Tanner was approximately $3.1 million, $1.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively (the “Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award”ultimately approved by the Compensation and together withManagement Development Committee. Based on these individual performance scores and theNon-Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award, achievement of the “Supplemental Bonus Award”). Followingcorporate and business performance objectives set forth above, the IPO, we converted all of these cashCompensation and Management Development Committee approved the following 2020 actual annual incentive awards into RSUs issued under our Incentive Plan. The number of shares received in this conversion was determined in a manner intended to replicate the respective economic value associated with the award under the Supplemental Bonus Plan based on the valuation derived from the IPO price, and the number of RSUs issued in respect of each award was equal to the award amount divided by $20.00, the per share price of our common stock sold to the publicadjusted 2020 annual incentive plan design discussed previously:

Name

 

 

Target(1)

 

  

Target Award (% of     

FYE Base Salary)     

 

 

Actual Cash     

Incentive as a     

% of Target     

 

 

Amount Earned

 

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

150%     

 

 

 

92.4%     

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,081,561

 

 

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

 

$

 

 

781,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

125%     

 

 

 

92.7%     

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   724,414

 

 

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

 

$

 

 

718,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

125%     

 

 

 

90.3%     

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   649,031

 

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

 

$

 

 

475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%     

 

 

 

92.8%     

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   436,339

 

 

 

 

(1)

Based on salary as of December 31, 2020.

The amounts set forth in the IPO.

As to Mr. Bartling, all of hisNon-Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award andtable above represent the amounts our NEOs received under the annual cash incentive program based on performance in 2020, a portion of his Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award were scheduledwhich was tied to vestthe Compensation and Management Development Committee’s exercise of discretion. The discretionary amounts by NEO are as follows: Mr. Tanner — $272,293; Mr. Freedman — $68,945; Mr. Young — $77,265; and Mr. Solls — $41,377. These additional discretionary amounts are set forth in three equal annual installments, with the first tranche vested on the February 6, 2017 completion“Bonus” column of the IPO,Summary Compensation Table.

2020 Long-Term (Equity) Incentive Program

On February 21, 2020, the Compensation and the second and third tranches were scheduled to vest, respectively, on first and second anniversaries thereafter, and the balance of his Discretionary Supplemental Bonus Award vested 80% upon the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO and the remaining 20% was scheduled to vest upon the occurrence of an exit event, dissolution or qualifying termination (each as defined in the award agreement). In connection with his termination of employment, all of his then-unvested RSUs under the Supplemental Bonus Award accelerated vesting.

As to Mr. Freedman, all of his Supplemental Bonus Award vested 80% upon the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO, and the remaining 20% is scheduled to vest upon the occurrence of an “exit event,” “dissolution” or “qualifying termination” (each as defined below).

Pursuant to Mr. Freedman’s award agreement for the RSUs he received under the Supplemental Bonus Plan, an “exit event” means the first to occur of (x) the date Blackstone and its affiliates cease to own 15% or more of our common stock) and (y) the date that is 18 months after the consummation of our IPO; a “dissolution” means a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of, or a liquidation of, the Company and its affiliates, or an event or series of events, in each case following which Blackstone and its affiliates cease to hold any equity interest the Company and its affiliates; and a “qualifying termination” means a termination of employment without “cause” or as a result of a “constructive termination” (each as defined in the award agreement applicable to the Supplemental Bonus Plan RSUs ).

As to Mr. Tanner, all of the RSUs under his Supplemental Bonus Award vest in three equal annual installments, with the first tranche vested on the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO, and the second and third tranches vesting, respectively, on first and second anniversaries thereafter. Vesting is, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

The following table sets forth the number and value of shares of vested and unvested RSUs Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner received at the time of the IPO in respect of their discretionary andnon-discretionary awards granted in the Supplemental Bonus Plan based on the foregoing described vesting.

  

Vested RSUs Received in

Exchange for Awards in the

Supplemental Bonus Plan

  

Unvested RSUs Received in

Exchange for Awards in the

Supplemental Bonus Plan

 

Name

         (#)                  ($)                  (#)                  ($)         

John B. Bartling Jr.

  282,770  $5,655,400   421,266  $8,425,320 

Ernest M. Freedman

  210,344  $4,206,880   52,584  $1,051,680 

Dallas B. Tanner

  33,776  $675,520   67,548  $1,350,960 

As described above under “Merger-Related Letter Agreements with Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner,” the vesting terms of Messrs. Freedman’s and Tanner’s RSUs under their Supplemental Bonus Awards were changed such that, if the executive employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by the executive upon a “constructive termination” (each as defined in the Severance Plan), the executive’s then-unvested RSUs outstanding under his Supplemental Bonus Award will vest.

In connection with his termination, Mr. Bartling’s then-unvested RSUs under his Supplemental Bonus Award accelerated vesting, and he was delivered shares of our common stock.

Invitation Homes’ Long-Term Incentive Program

As part of our annual compensation setting process, and in connection with our transition from being privately held to publicly traded, the CompensationManagement Development Committee approved a 2020 long-term incentive equity award program (the “2017“2020 LTIP”). The

2018 Proxy Statement36


Executive Compensation(continued)

2017 LTIP provided for the grant of equity-based awards to several employees, including Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner. The awards were granted under the Invitation Homes Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”), and as of March 1, 2020, granted our NEOs equity-based awards in the form of time-vestingtime vesting RSUs (the “LTIP Time RSUs”) and performance-vesting RSUs (the “LTIP PRSUs” and, collectively withperformance vesting RSUs. When considering the LTIP Time RSUs, the “LTIP RSUs”). Each award of 2017 LTIP RSUs is divided into three tranches (“Tranche 1,” “Tranche 2” and “Tranche 3”) and, within each tranche, 25%design of the award consists2020 LTIP, the Compensation and Management Development Committee incorporated several key design practices:

A majority (75%) is performance-based;

We target to outperform;

Awards are capped at target to the extent the Company’s TSR is negative across the performance period; and

We also provide for a portion of LTIP Time RSUs, andour awards that aid in long-term retention (time-based).

For each individual award, 75% of the award consists2020 LTIP RSUs at target are based on performance, of LTIP PRSUs.which 45% are tied to the TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR (with a cap at target if the Company’s absolute TSR is negative) and 30% are tied to the Company’s Same Store NOI Growth CAGR. The Compensation and Management Development Committee set goals which are reasonably achievable but challenging.

2017The time vesting RSUs under the 2020 LTIP Time RSUs.The Tranche 1 2017 LTIP Time RSUs are scheduled to vest in full on the first anniversary of March 1, 2017, the Tranche 2 2017 LTIP Time RSUs are scheduled to vest in two equal installments on each of the first and second anniversaries of March 1, 2017, and the Tranche 3 2017 LTIP Time RSUs are scheduled to vest in equal annual installments on each of the first fourthree anniversaries of March 1, 2017, in each case,2020, subject to the executive’seach NEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.date, with certain limited exceptions.

IfThe performance vesting RSUs under the executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than as described below, all unvested2020 LTIP Time RSUs will be forfeited. Upon a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the Incentive Plan) or, if the executive resigns from employment following a “constructive termination” (as defined in the award agreement applicable to the LTIP RSUs, and together, with a termination without cause, a “qualifying involuntary termination”), the next installment of LTIP Time RSUs that would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date will vest as of the date of termination. LTIP Time RSUs that are eligible to vest upon a qualifying involuntary termination are subject to the executive’s execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company. Upon an executive’s death or a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company following the executive’s “disability” (as defined in the Incentive Plan), any unvested LTIP Time RSUs will vest as of the date of termination. The LTIP Time RSUs will also continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule following the executive’s “retirement” (as defined below) and will be subject to forfeiture if the executive violates specified restrictive covenants agreed to with the Company and described below. Upon a change in control, if the LTIP Time RSUs are assumed by the successor or acquiror and a qualifying involuntary termination occurs during thetwo-year period following a change in control, any then-unvested LTIP Time RSUs will vest. Upon a change in control, if the LTIP Time RSUs are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, any then-unvested LTIP Time RSUs will immediately vest. “Retirement” is generally defined as a voluntary resignation of employment at such time that the executive is at least 55 years old (60 years old in the case of Mr. Bartling), the participant has at least 10 years of continuous service (no minimum in the case of Mr. Bartling) and the sum of the executive’s age and years of service equals at least 65, provided that the executive has given at least six months’ prior notice of the executive’s retirement.

In June 2017, Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner were granted 2017 LTIP Time RSUs in the amount of 62,157, 25,324 and 25,324, respectively. In connection with Mr. Bartling’s termination of employment, the next installment of 28,488 2017 LTIP Time RSUs that would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date following his departure vested, and the remainder of his 2017 LTIP Time RSUs were forfeited.

2017 LTIP PRSUs. The 2017 LTIP PRSUs may be earned based on the achievement of performance measuresconditions over an approximateone-,two-, ora three-year performance period which performance periods correspond, respectively, to the Tranchefrom January 1, Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 2017 LTIP RSUs.2020 through December 31, 2022. The number of 2017 LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs that may be earned will be determined based on performance achieved during the specified performance period. Within each tranche, the 2017 LTIP PRSUsThe performance vesting RSUs may be earned based on three equally weightedtwo performance measures: (1) the compounded annual growth rate ofTSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR for the performance period; and (2) the Company’s stockholder return (“Absolute TSR”); (2) the compounded annual growth rate of the Company’s same store net operating income (“Same Store NOI Growth CAGR”); and (3) the compounded annual growth rate per share in the Company’s adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO Growth CAGR”), with each of the three types of 2017 LTIP PRSUs composing 25% of the 2017 LTIP RSUs.

The respective performance periods are summarized in the table below:

Performance Measure

Tranche 1

Performance Period

Tranche 2

Performance Period

Tranche 3

Performance Period

Absolute TSR(1)

January 31, 2017 –

December 31, 2017

January 31, 2017 –

December 31, 2018

January 31, 2017 –

December 31, 2019

Same Store NOI Growth CAGR

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2017

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2018

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2019

AFFO Growth CAGR

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2017

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2018

January 1, 2017 –

December 31, 2019

(1)Our common stock began trading on the NYSE on February 1, 2017. Accordingly, the commencement of the performance period for the 2017 LTIP PRSUs that vest based on Absolute TSR reflects the period following which Absolute TSR can be measured.

372018 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation(continued)

CAGR.

Under the terms of the 2020 LTIP award agreements, for the 2017 LTIP PRSUs, each executiveof our NEOs is eligible to earn, in respect of each tranche,performance condition, a threshold, target and maximum number of PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs based on whether the performance criteria are achieved at threshold, target or maximum levels. The total number of PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs earned with respect to each performance measure is based on an achievement factor which, in each case, ranges from a 0% payout for below threshold performance, to 50% for threshold performance, to 100% for target performance and up to 200% for performance at maximum levels or above. ForThe resulting achievement will be interpolated on a straight-line basis based on actual performanceachievement between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels with no payout for any performance measure that did not achieve the resulting achievement percentage will be adjusted on a straight line basis.threshold.

The LTIP PRSUs

2021 Proxy Statement50


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

In general, performance vesting RSUs are generally earned and eligible to vest on the date after the end of the performance period on which the Compensation and Management Development Committee certifies the extent to which the performance criteria have been achieved (the “Certification Date”). The Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 2017 LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs will vest on the Certification Date, subject to the executive’seach NEO’s continued employment through such Certification Date except in the event of a qualifying involuntary termination astermination. Any unearned performance vesting RSUs will be forfeited without consideration.

Under the 2020 LTIP, the Compensation and Management Development Committee granted time vesting and performance vesting RSUs to our NEOs in the following amounts (the number of performance vesting RSUs below reflects the number of shares at target), with the actual number of shares to be earned based on the actual achievement of the performance criteria described below. above.

Name

 

 

 

Performance Vesting RSUs(1) (Target)
(#)

 

  

 

Time Vesting RSUs(1)
(#)

 

 
  

Dallas B. Tanner

  83,621                          30,361           
  

Ernest M. Freedman

  39,216                          14,238           
  

Charles D. Young

  39,216                          14,238           
  

Mark A. Solls

  18,455                          6,701           

(1)

The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the next trading date following the grant date of March 1, 2020, was $29.85. Conversion to RSUs for the TSR component of the award assumes a TSR valuation factor of 115.81% for NEOs.

Status of Pre-2020 Long-Term Incentive Programs

2017 LTIP Awards

In June 2017, the Compensation and Management Development Committee approved a long-term incentive equity award program under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 LTIP”). The 2017 LTIP provided for the grant of equity-based awards to several key employees, including Messrs. Tanner, Freedman and Solls. The awards were granted in the form of time vesting RSUs and performance vesting RSUs. Each award of 2017 LTIP RSUs was divided into three tranches (“Tranche 1,” “Tranche 2” and “Tranche 3”) and, within each tranche, 25% of the award consisted of time vesting RSUs and 75% consisted of performance vesting RSUs. Tranche 1 time vesting RSUs vested on the first anniversary of the vesting start date. Tranche 2 time vesting RSUs vested in equal installments on each of the first and second anniversaries of the vesting start date, and Tranche 3 vested on each of the first four anniversaries of the vesting start date. The final installment of time vesting RSUs vested on March 1, 2021.

The 2017 LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs were earned based on the achievement of performance measures over approximate one-, two- or three-year performance periods, which performance periods correspond, respectively, to the Tranche 1, Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 RSUs. The number of 2017 LTIP performance vesting RSUs earned was determined based on performance achieved during the specified performance period. Within each tranche, the 2017 LTIP performance vesting RSUs were earned based on three equally weighted performance measures: (1) the CAGR of the Company’s shareholder return (“2017 LTIP Absolute TSR”); (2) the Company’s Same Store NOI Growth CAGR; and (3) the Company’s AFFO per Share Growth CAGR.

The performance period for Tranche 3 of our 2017 LTIP ended on December 31, 2019 with total achievement on the performance vesting RSUs of approximately 140%. 50% of the performance vesting RSUs vested on February 21, 2020, and the remaining performance vesting RSUs vested on December 31, 2020.

Retention RSUs

In June 2017, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation and Management Development Committee, granted to each of Messrs. Tanner and Freedman 138,122 time vesting RSUs (collectively, the “Retention RSUs”). As more fully described below, 69,061 Retention RSUs of each such NEO’s awards vested on May 16, 2019, the date that was 18 months from the closing date of the Merger. The remaining portion of each such NEOs’ time vesting RSUs, will vest ason June 19, 2021, subject to 50%the NEO’s continued employment through that date.

2018 LTIP Awards

In February 2018, the Compensation and Management Development Committee approved our 2018 2018 LTIP, under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, comprising equity-based awards in the form of such PRSUs,time vesting RSUs and performance vesting RSUs. The time vesting RSUs under the 2018 LTIP vested in equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of March 1, 2018.

512021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

The performance vesting RSUs under the 2018 LTIP were earned based on the achievement of performance conditions over a three-year performance period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The number of performance vesting RSUs that were earned was determined based on performance achieved during the specified performance period. The performance vesting RSUs were earned based on two performance measures: (1) the TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR for the performance period; and (2) the Company’s Same Store NOI Growth CAGR.

Actual performance for the two metrics included were as follows:

   

2018 LTIP

 Target   Achievement Payout

 

TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR

 

 

+50bps    

 

 

+650bps

 

 

200%

 

Same Store NOI Growth CAGR

 

 

 

    5%        

 

 

 

    4.30%    

 

 

 

    65%    

 

In general, performance vesting RSUs are earned on the Certification Date. The 2018 LTIP performance vesting RSUs vested on the Certification Date. Any unearned 2018 LTIP performance vesting RSUs were forfeited without consideration.

Under the 2018 LTIP, the Compensation and Management Development Committee granted time vesting and performance vesting RSUs to our NEOs in the following amounts (the number of performance vesting RSUs below reflects the number of shares at target), with the actual number of shares to be earned based on the actual achievement of the performance criteria described above.

 

Name

 

 

Performance Vesting RSUs(1) (Target)
(#)

 

 

Time Vesting RSUs(1)
(#)

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

47,912

 

 

17,116

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

47,912

 

 

17,116

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

47,912

 

 

17,116

 

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

15,972

 

 

  5,706

 

(1)

The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date, March 1, 2018, was $21.91. Conversion to RSUs for the TSR component of the award assumes a TSR valuation factor of 112.55% for all NEOs.

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

In February 2018, the Compensation and Management Development Committee granted to each of Messrs. Tanner, Freedman, Young and Solls a one-time supplemental award of 18,257, 18,257, 18,257 and 9,129 time vesting RSUs, respectively (collectively, the “2018 Supplemental Bonus Award”), in recognition of their leadership efforts towards the successful completion of the Merger and the ongoing work on the integration of the two companies’ businesses and operations. These RSUs vested in equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of March 1, 2018.

2019 LTIP Awards

In February 2019, the Compensation and Management Development Committee approved our 2019 long-term incentive equity award program (the “2019 LTIP”), under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, comprising equity-based awards in the form of time vesting RSUs and performance vesting RSUs. The time vesting RSUs under the 2019 LTIP are scheduled to vest in equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of March 1, 2019, subject to each NEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, with certain limited exceptions.

The performance vesting RSUs under the 2019 LTIP may be earned based on the achievement of performance conditions over a three-year performance period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. The number of performance vesting RSUs that may be earned will be determined based on performance achieved during the specified performance period. The performance vesting RSUs may be earned based on two performance measures: (1) the TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR for the performance period; and (2) the Company’s Same Store NOI Growth CAGR.

In general, performance vesting RSUs are earned on the Certification Date. The performance vesting RSUs will vest on the Certification Date, subject to the executive’seach NEO’s continued employment through such Certification Date except in the event of a qualifying involuntary termination as described below, and the remaining 50% of such earned 2017 LTIP PRSUs will vest on December 31, 2020, subject to the executive’s continued employment through such applicable vesting date except in the event of a qualifying involuntary termination as described below.termination. Any unearned 2017 LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs will be forfeited without consideration.

Notwithstanding

2021 Proxy Statement52


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Under the foregoing, upon a qualifying involuntary termination prior2019 LTIP, the Compensation and Management Development Committee granted time vesting and performance vesting RSUs to our NEOs in the last dayfollowing amounts (the number of any performance period, a prorated portionvesting RSUs below reflects the number of shares at target), with the 2017 LTIP PRSUs will remain outstanding and eligibleactual number of shares to vest based on actual performance through the last day of the applicable performance period,be earned based on the number of days during the applicable performance period that the executive was employed. Any 2017 LTIP PRSUs that are earned based on actual performance will vest on, and settle as soon as practicable following, the applicable Certification Date. Upon a qualifying involuntary termination following the last day of any performance period but prior to the Certification Date, any unearned and unvested 2017 LTIP PRSUs will vest on the applicable Certification Date based on actual performance as of the endachievement of the performance period. Upon a qualifying involuntary termination following the Certification Date where such 2017 LTIP PRSUs are subject to continued service-vesting conditions, such earned but unvested 2017 LTIP PRSUs will vest on the executive’s termination date. Any 2017 LTIP PRSUs that are eligible to vest upon a qualifying involuntary termination are subject to the executive’s execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company.criteria described above.

Upon a change in control, the number of 2017 LTIP PRSUs that become earned will be calculated based

 

Name

 

 

Performance Vesting RSUs(1) (Target)
(#)

 

 

Time Vesting RSUs(1)
(#)

 

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

 

 

 

67,267

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,682

 

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

 

 

 

47,834

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,552

 

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

 

 

 

47,834

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,552

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

 

 

 

20,928

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,679

 

 

 

(1)

The closing price of our common stock on actual performance through the date of the change in control (or, with respect to AFFO Growth CAGR and Same Store NOI Growth CAGR, through the date of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the change in control) without proration. Any earned 2017 LTIP PRSUs will vest as to 50% of such earned 2017 LTIP PRSUs on the date of the change in control and, as to the remaining 50% on the first anniversary of the change in control (or, in each case, upon a qualifying involuntary termination that occurs within the NYSE on the grant date, March 1, 2019, was $22.79. Conversion to RSUs for the TSR component of the award assumes a TSR valuation factor of 118.01% for NEOs.

two-yearRSU Dividends period following the change in control). If the awards are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, or are unable to be measured in a consistent manner, any earned 2017 LTIP PRSUs (including the 2017 LTIP PRSUs that become earned in connection with the change in control) will immediately vest as of the change in control.

In June 2017, Messrs. Bartling, Freedman and Tanner were granted 2017 LTIP PRSUs in the amount of 182,030, 74,164 and 74,164, respectively, which amounts assume target level of performance achievement. In connection with Mr. Bartling’s termination of employment, 78,256 2017 LTIP PRSUs, representing the prorated portion of his 2017 LTIP PRSUs, remained outstanding as of the employment termination date and are eligible to vest (which number of 2017 LTIP PRSUs may be higher or lower based on actual performance achieved during the originally scheduled performance period).

Dividends.Holders of LTIP Timetime vesting RSUs (whether or not settled) and earned LTIP PRSUs (whether unvested or vested and not yet settled)performance vesting RSUs are entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalent payments, as applicable, to the extent dividends are declared on ourthe Company’s common stock. Such dividends or dividend equivalent payments, as applicable, are payable on the same date and in the same form (cash or additional shares of common stock) as are paid to holders of ourthe Company’s common stock. Unearned LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs accrue dividend equivalents, however,but such dividendsdividend equivalents will only be paid to the extent the underlying LTIP PRSUsperformance vesting RSUs are earned and, once earned, are payable once earned.in the same form as that paid to the Company’s holders of common stock. To date, all dividends declared on the Company’s common stock were paid in cash.

RSU Covenants and Clawback.

Each of the foregoing executiveNEO grantees of LTIPthe RSUs is subject to restrictive covenants related to post-employmentnon-solicitation andnon-competition for twelve months following any termination of employment and indefinite covenants covering trade secrets, confidentiality andnon-disparagement. Under the LTIP

2018 Proxy Statement38


Executive Compensation(continued)

award agreement,agreements, if there is a restrictive covenant violation or the executive granteeNEO engages in a detrimental activity (as defined in the applicable LTIP award agreement) in the four-year period following the grant date, the executiveNEO will be required to pay the Company an amount equal to theafter-tax proceeds received upon the sale or disposition of the equity award and any shares issued in respect thereof. In addition, the LTIP RSU awardsRSUs are subject to clawback in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results due to the executive’s fraud or intentional illegal conduct where such restatement results in fewer earned PRSUs, as well as any additional Company clawback policy.performance vesting RSUs.

Retention RSU2019 One-Time Outperformance Equity-Based Awards

In June 2017, Messrs. FreedmanMay 2019, the Compensation and TannerManagement Development Committee approved a one-time outperformance program (“Outperformance Program”) to provide incentive to achieve significant long-term, absolute and relative stock performance. The award is capped to prevent excessive risk taking. Outperformance Program equity-based awards were each granted 138,122 time-vesting RSUs (the “Retention RSUs”).to select key associates starting at a vice-president level and above, including the NEOs. The Retention RSUs haveNEO awards were granted in the form of a vesting schedule where 50%class of units (collectively referred to as “OP Units”) of the Company’s operating partnership, Invitation Homes Operating Partnership LP (the “Operating Partnership”), issued under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. If the specific performance objectives of the Outperformance Program are achieved, the earned OP Units become convertible into common units of the Operating Partnership (and ultimately into shares of our common stock at NEOs’ election) following vesting. The Outperformance Program awards are earned and payable only when performance exceeds hurdles as measured by three-year TSR and requires outperforming an index of residential REITs (in which the Company is a constituent) and/or positive double-digit stockholder returns. If the performance objectives are not met, the OP Units will be cancelled.

What Makes the Outperformance Program Unique Compared to Other Long-Term Incentive Plans

The Compensation and Management Development Committee believes the Outperformance Program incorporates several unique design features that distinguish its long-term incentive design from our ongoing annual LTIP program and that of many other companies, such as:

Dollar Value Pool-Based Award — The Outperformance Program extends participation to approximately 50 select key associates and is capped based on a dollar value pool approach. Unlike grants of performance shares that have unlimited upside value potential based on future stock price, the Outperformance Program is capped in its value.

532021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Five-Year Total Vesting Requirement — The Outperformance Program is subject to long-term vesting to promote enhanced retention in addition to significant stockholder value creation. Any award vestsultimately earned does not fully vest until five years from program commencement.

Robust Performance Goals — The Compensation and Management Development Committee believes in establishing robust performance goals to motivate and reward long-term performance that leads to transformational change in support of creating increased stockholder value. To that end, the performance goals were established at a level that will award a minimum payout of 1% with respect to the TSR portion of the award (50% of the total award) if the Company achieves a 17% cumulative TSR and a minimum payout of 1% with respect to the relative TSR portion of the award (50% of the total award) if the Company outperforms the FTSE Nareit Residential Index. A maximum payout of 100% will be awarded under the Outperformance Program only if the Company realizes both a cumulative three-year 37% TSR and relative performance that exceeds the FTSE Nareit Residential Index by 25%. Performance between the minimum and maximum levels is determined based on linear interpolation.

Below is a summary of the key terms of the Outperformance Program:

Feature

Description

Objective

Performance Period

Three-year period from April 1, 2019 — March 31, 2022

Incentivizes executives to create value over the long term.

Absolute TSR Component

To earn the maximum award, the Company must deliver a cumulative TSR of 37% over the performance period.

Ensures executives create value for stockholders over the long term.

Relative TSR Component

To earn the maximum award, the Company must outperform the FTSE Nareit Residential Index by 25% over the performance period.

Prevents a high payout in the case of underperformance relative to peers.

Vesting

— 50% of earned awards vest within 60 days subsequent to the conclusion of the performance period
— 25% of Earned Awards vest on the first anniversary of the conclusion of the performance period
— 25% of Earned Awards vest on the second anniversary of the conclusion of the performance period

Promotes continued alignment of incentives between stockholders and plan participants over the long term.

Outperformance Program Award Opportunity

The table below illustrates the value of the Outperformance Program awards in aggregate based on the date that is 18 months frommaximum award value, a 50% payout and on an annualized basis.

   
 

 

Outperformance
Program Award
  Pool Percentage  

Aggregate Award
Opportunity
Annualized Award
Opportunity

NEO

50% PayoutMaximum
Award Value
50% PayoutMaximum
Award Value
     

Dallas B. Tanner

16.6%$3,000,000$6,000,000$1,000,000$2,000,000
     

Ernest M. Freedman

12.4%$2,254,688$4,509,375$751,563$1,503,125
     

Charles D. Young

12.0%$2,170,313$4,340,625$723,438$1,446,875
     

Mark A. Solls

  6.6%$1,200,000$2,400,000$400,000$800,000

The values under the closing dateannualized award opportunity have been amortized over the three-year performance period to provide a depiction of the Merger,way the Compensation and 50%Management Development Committee views each NEO’s participation in this one-time program.

2021 Proxy Statement54


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Earning and Vesting of Outperformance Program Awards

The following chart illustrates the timeline of the one-time Outperformance Program awards.

LOGO

2021 Compensation Decisions

In February 2021, the Compensation and Management Development Committee approved our 2021 long-term incentive equity award vestsprogram (the “2021 LTIP”) under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and as of March 1, 2021, granted our NEOs equity-based awards in fullthe form of time vesting RSUs and performance vesting RSUs. The time vesting RSUs are scheduled to vest in equal annual installments on the fourth anniversaryeach of the grant datefirst three anniversaries of March 1, 2021, subject in each case, to the executive’sNEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.If the executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than as described below, all unvested Retentiondate (with certain limited exceptions).

The performance vesting RSUs willmay be forfeited. Upon a qualifying involuntary termination of the executive’s employment, a prorated portion of the total number of Retention RSUs originally granted to the executive will vest as of the date of termination,earned based on the totalachievement of performance conditions over a three-year performance period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. The number days the executive was employedof performance vesting RSUs that may be earned will be determined based on performance achieved during the specified performance period. The performance vesting period, subjectRSUs may be earned based on two performance measures: (1) the compounded annual growth rate of the Company’s shareholder return relative to the executive’s executionMSCI US REIT Index for the performance period; andnon-revocation of a release of claims in favor (2) the compounded annual growth rate of the Company. Upon a change in control, if the Retention RSUs are assumed by the successor or acquiror, then the Retention RSUs will vest on the scheduled vesting datesCompany’s net operating income for an identified population of homes

In establishing 2021 executive compensation, our Compensation and if a qualifying involuntary termination occurs during thetwo-year period following the change in control, all of the Retention RSUs will vest. If the Retention RSUs are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, any then-unvested Retention RSUs will immediately vest. The other terms of the Retention RSUs, including the terms related to dividends or dividend equivalent payments, as applicable, restrictive covenants and clawback are substantially the same as with those applicableManagement Development Committee considered market data relative to the LTIP Time RSUs.

As described above under “Merger-Related Letter Agreements with Messrs. Bartling, Freedmanpeer group and Tanner,” the vesting terms of Messrs. Freedman’s and Tanner’s Retention RSUs were changed such that the Retention RSUs that were scheduled to cliff-vest on June 19, 2022 will instead vest on the date that is 18 months from the closing date of the Merger, subjectperformance, changes to the executive’s continued employment through that dateresponsibilities of our executive officers, and iflevel of pay relative to the executive employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by the executive upon a “constructive termination” (eachCompany’s other executives, and approved increases to several compensation components for our NEOs as defined in the applicable award agreement for the Retention RSUs), the executive’s then-unvested Retention RSUs outstanding will vest on the termination date.discussed below.

Mr. Tuomi’s CompensationTanner

2017 Annual Cash Incentive Award

PriorAs previously disclosed, upon being named CEO in January 2019, Mr. Tanner’s initial compensation reflected his position as a newly promoted CEO and was targeted at a relative pay level that generally aligned with the lower quartile of our peers. Last year we noted that the Compensation and Management Development Committee would increase Mr. Tanner’s pay commensurate with his performance and tenure as part of a pre-defined, multi-year strategy for adjusting his compensation. In light of Mr. Tanner’s increased tenure and exceptional performance, further evidenced by the Company’s strong relative and sustained outperformance of over 4,000 basis points in total shareholder return compared to the Merger,MSCI US REIT Index, the Compensation and Management Development Committee adjusted Mr. Tuomi participated in SWH’s 2017 Executive Bonus Program (the “SWH Bonus Program”)Tanner’s 2021 target compensation opportunity. The Compensation and was eligible to earn a cash award based on SWH’s achievement in 2017 of performance goals related to SWH’s Same Store Revenue Growth, Same Store Core NOI Margin, Core FFO $ per share and a subjective assessment. SWH’s compensation committee had approved targets forManagement Development Committee increased Mr. Tuomi’s annual cash incentive award, which were expressed as a percentage of hisTanner’s base salary in effect at fiscal year-end. In connection with the Merger, we agreed2021 from $800,000 to pay Mr. Tuomi’s annual cash incentive$900,000, and increased his target 2021 LTIP award for the period during 2017 following the Merger foropportunity (75% which he provided servicesis tied to the combined company and determine the amount payable based on the actual achievement of thefuture three-year performance measures previously established under the SWH Bonus Program. For 2017, SWH’s Same Store Revenue Growth achieved resulted in 127% achievement, Same Store Core NOI Margin achieved resulted in 150% achievement, Core FFO per share achieved resulted in 150% achievement and the subjective assessment resulted in 125% achievement. These achievements resulted in an annual cash incentive award of $174,394 for the prorated period for which Mr. Tuomi was an INVH employeegoals) from the closing of the Merger through year-end 2017.

Merger-Related Term Sheet

In contemplation of the Merger, in September 2017, we entered into a term sheet with Mr. Tuomi (the “Tuomi Term Sheet”) for Mr. Tuomi$3.625 million to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer following the Merger. Under the Tuomi Term Sheet, Mr. Tuomi would be eligible to receive: (1) an annual base salary of $800,000; (2) an annual performance-based bonus with a target bonus percentage equal to 150% of base salary, with a threshold bonus of 75% of his base salary if minimum performance objectives are achieved and a maximum bonus of 225% of his base salary for top performance; (3) an annual long-term incentive award with a target value of $3.5 million, with 25% of the grant consisting of time-vesting awards and 75% of the grant consisting of performance-vesting awards; and (4) a sign-on$6.5 million.

 

   3955  20182021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

 

 

equity incentive award (the “Sign-On RSU Award”) with a value of $7.0 million, with 50% of the grant consisting of time-vesting RSUs and 50% of the grant consisting of performance-vesting RSUs. Mr. Tuomi would also be entitled to participate in our health and benefit plans, including the Severance Plan, on the same terms available to our other executive officers. The Tuomi Term Sheet also provided that if he experienced an involuntary termination of employment without cause, he would be entitled to any amounts applicable under the Severance Plan and accelerated vesting of any equity granted prior to the Merger that did not accelerate vesting in connection with the Merger. For additional information about payments and benefits to which Mr. Tuomi would be entitled upon qualifying employment termination events or a change in control, see “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”LOGO

Sign-On RSU Award

As described above under “Merger-Related Term Sheet,” the Tuomi’s Term Sheet provided for aSign-On RSU Award with a value of $7.0 million, where half of the award is time-vesting (“Time-VestingSign-On RSUs”), and half of the award is performance-vesting (“Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs”) based on the achievement of performance objectives.

Time-VestingSign-On RSUs: The Tuomi Term Sheet provided that the Time-VestingSign-On RSUs would vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date, however, the Compensation Committee determined in 2018 that these RSUs will vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. This constituted an administrative change that did not result in any incremental fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Upon a termination of Mr. Tuomi’s employment by us without “cause” (as defined in the Incentive Plan) or, if Mr. Tuomi resigns from employment following a “constructive termination” (as defined in the award agreement, and together with a termination without cause, a “qualifying termination”), any unvestedTime-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest as of the date of termination subject to Mr. Tuomi’s execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company. Upon Mr. Tuomi’s death or a termination of his employment by us due to Mr. Tuomi’s “disability” (as defined in the Incentive Plan), any unvested Time-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest as of the date of termination. If Mr. Tuomi’s employment is terminated for any other reason, all of the unvested Time-VestingSign-On RSUs will be forfeited. Upon a change in control, if the unvested Time-VestingSign-On RSUs are assumed by the successor or acquiror and a qualifying termination occurs during thetwo-year period following a change in control, any then-unvested Time-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest. Upon a change in control, if the unvestedTime-VestingSign-On RSUs are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, any then-unvested Time-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest immediately prior to the change in control.

Performance-Vesting Sign-On RSUs:The terms of the Performance-Vesting Sign-On RSUs were established and approved in 2018 and thereby granted in 2018. The Performance-Vesting Sign-On RSUs may be earned based on the achievement under three equally weighted performance measures over a specified performance period: (1) the compounded annual growth rate of the Company’s stockholder return relative to the MSCI US REIT Index (“TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR”); (2) the annualized cost savings resulting from any costs eliminated, netted against costs added, in connection with the integration of SWH platforms with ours following the Merger (“Run Rate Annualized Synergies”); and (3) the Company’s succession preparedness (“Management Development and CEO Succession Plan”). The performance periods and weighting for the respective performance measures are summarized in the table below.

Performance Measure

Performance Period

Relative Weighting

TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR

November 16, 2017 – November 16, 2020One-Third

Run Rate Annualized Synergies

November 16, 2017 – March 31, 2019One-Third

Management Development and CEO Succession Plan(1)

November 16, 2017 – November 16, 2020One-Third

 

(1)The level of achievement of

Data is for the pre-established goals under this qualitative performance measure will be evaluated by the Compensation Committee after the end of the performance period.period from January 16, 2019 through December 31, 2020.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee increased Mr. TuomiTanner’s base salary in 2021 from $800,000 to $900,000, and increased his target 2021 LTIP award opportunity (75% which is eligibletied to earn,future three-year performance goals) from $3.625 million to $6.5 million.

Mr. Freedman

The Compensation and Management Development Committee increased Mr. Freedman’s base salary in respect2021 from $625,000 to $650,000 and increased his target 2021 LTIP award opportunity (75% of eachwhich is tied to future three-year performance measure, a threshold,goals) from $1.7 million to $1.8 million.

Mr. Young

The Compensation and Management Development Committee increased Mr. Young’s base salary in 2021 from $575,000 to $650,000 and increased his target 2021 LTIP award opportunity (75% of which is tied to future three-year performance goals) from $1.7 million to $1.8 million.

Mr. Solls

The Compensation and Management Development Committee increased Mr. Solls’ target 2021 LTIP award opportunity (75% of which is tied to future three-year performance goals) from $800,000 to $825,000. No changes were made to Mr. Solls’ base salary or cash bonus.

In addition, the Compensation and Management Development Committee decided certain key officers’, including NEOs’, annual cash incentive program maximum number of Performance-Vesting Sign-On RSUs based on the level of whether the performance criteria are achieved at threshold, target or maximum levels. The total number of Performance-Vesting Sign-On RSUs earned with respectopportunity would increase to each performance measure is based on an achievement factor which, in each case, ranges200% from a 0% payout for below threshold performance, to 80% for threshold performance, to 100% for target performance, up to 120% for performance at maximum levels or above. For actual performance between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels, the resulting achievement percentage will be adjusted150% on a linear basis.go-forward basis, to better align with peers and drive stronger pay for performance.

Other Matters

Risk Mitigation

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation programs with management and FPL, and the Compensation and Management Development Committee does not believe the goals, or the underlying philosophy, of our compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking. The Company’s incentive compensation programs contain appropriate risk mitigation factors, including award caps, multiple performance metrics, clawback features and ranges of awards. The share ownership and retention guidelines also mitigate risk. The Compensation and Management Development Committee regularly reviews the incentive compensation plans to ensure they are designed to create and maintain stockholder value and do not encourage excessive risk.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  4056   


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)   

 

 

Following the last day of any applicable performance period, the Compensation Committee will calculate the number of Performance-VestingSign-OnClawback Policy

RSUs that have been earned. Any Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs that do not become earned based on actual performance during the applicable performance period will be forfeited on the last day of the performance period. All Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs thatgranted under our long-term incentive plans are earned will vest on November 16, 2020 (the third anniversary of the Merger closing date), subject to Mr. Tuomi’s continued employment through that date. If Mr. Tuomi’s employment is terminated for any reason other than as described below, all unvested Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs will be forfeited. Upon a qualifying termination, Mr. Tuomi’s death, or a termination of his employment due to disability prior to the last day of any performance period, a prorated portion of the Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance through the last day of the applicable performance period based on the number of days during the applicable performance period that Mr. Tuomi was employed, subject to his (or his executor’s) execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company. Any Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs that are earned based on actual performance will vest on the date the Compensation Committee calculates the number of Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs that have been earned, and any Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs that were earned as of the date of termination but not yet vested will vest on the date of termination. Upon a change in control, the Compensation Committee will determine the number of Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs that have been earned based on its determination of the satisfactory completion of the performance conditions through the date of the change in control. Any earned Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest as to 50% of such Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs on the date of the change in control and, as to the remaining 50%, on the first anniversary of the change in control. If a qualifying termination occurs during thetwo-year period following a change in control, any earned Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs will vest. If the awards are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, any earned Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs (including any RSUs that become earned in connection with the change in control) will vest immediately prior to the change in control.

Mr. Tuomi is entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalent payments, as applicable, in respect of his Time-VestingSign-On RSUs and any earned Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs (whether vested or unvested and not yet settled) on the same date and in the same form (cash or additional shares of common stock) as are paid to holders of our common stock. Unearned Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs accrue dividend equivalent payments, but will be paid only to the extent the underlying Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs are earned and, once earned, are payable in cash (unless the Compensation Committee elects to settle in shares) at the time the Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs are earned.

Mr. Tuomi is subject to restrictive covenants related to post-employmentnon-solicitation andnon-competition for twelve months following any termination of employment and indefinite covenants covering confidentiality and intellectual property. Under the award agreement, if there is a restrictive covenant violation or Mr. Tuomi engages in a detrimental activity (as defined in the award agreement) in the five-year period following the effective date of the grant, Mr. Tuomi will be required to pay the Company an amount equal to theafter-tax proceeds received upon the sale or disposition of, or distributions in respect of, the RSUs and any shares issued in respect thereof. The RSUs are also subject to clawback in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results due to Mr. Tuomi’sthe executive’s fraud or intentional illegal conduct where such restatement results in fewer earned Performance-Vestingperformance vesting RSUs.

Sign-OnAnti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies RSUs, as well as

The Company’s directors, officers and employees may not engage in hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s securities, including engaging in transactions in forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds, puts, calls, options and other derivative securities or any additional Company clawback policy.

Retirement Benefits

We maintain atax-qualified 401(k) plan, under which we match each employee’s contributionsdollar-for-dollar upinstruments designed to 3% of such employee’s eligible earnings, and we match 50% on the next 2% of each employee’s eligible earnings contributed. All of our matching contributions are fully vested, and each NEO was eligible to participateincrease in the 401(k) plan in 2017.

2018 Compensation Decisions

Our Compensation Committee oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation programs and evaluates these programs against competitive practices, legal and regulatory developments and corporate governance trends. Asvalue as a result of, or hedge or offset any decrease in, the Merger, and in order to ensure that there is a strong alignment across pay opportunities withmarket value of the Company’s goals and strategiessecurities. In addition, the Company’s officers may not purchase the Company’s securities on margin, borrow against any account in which the Company’s securities are held or pledge the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan. Company directors who wish to pledge the coming year, our Compensation Committee determinedCompany’s securities as collateral for a loan must first submit a request for approval to make modest adjustments to our incentive programs. For 2018, the compensation framework will continue to have three main compensation program elements that will assess performance across a variety of goals and measure performance

412018 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation(continued)

across an annual and multi-year performance period while preserving a substantial emphasis on performance-based pay. The table below contains a design overviewOffice of the executive compensation program.

Element

FormMetrics and Weighting

Base Salary

Fixed CashFixed rate of pay utilizedChief Legal Officer prior to attract and retain executives

Annual Cash

Incentive

Award

Performance-Based
Cash
90% Corporate financial objectives (including AFFO per share and Same Store Core Revenue Growth YoY), defined corporate priorities (including Run Rate Annualized Synergies as of 2018 year end, and Enhanced Resident Loyalty Strategy), and defined business unit and operational objectives
10% Individual performance goals

Long-Term

Incentive

Award

Performance-Vesting
RSUs
75% Foward-looking three-year performance period in which awards may be earned based 45% upon relative TSR versus MSCI US REIT Index (Relative TSR CAGR) and 30% upon Same Store NOI Growth CAGR; if earned at the end of the performance period, awards will be eligible to vest on the Certification Date; if three-year absolute TSR is negative, TSR metric is capped at target
Time-Vesting RSUs25% Awards vest ratably over three years

A substantial portion of our CEO’s pay is at-risk and based on a variety of future performance achievements. Furthermore, only approximately 36% of our CEO’s 2018 target compensation opportunity is in the form of cash and approximately 64% of his target compensation opportunity is in the form of equity.

LOGO

Consistent with the structural framework that applied to our former President and Chief Executive Officer under the 2017 AIP, the 2018 AIP for our President and Chief Executive Officer will continue to be primarily focused on a variety of financial and quantitative based metrics comprising 90%execution of the overall opportunity and 10% that is tied to individual performance. In addition, consistent withdocuments evidencing the structural framework that applied to our former President and Chief Executive Officer under the 2017 LTIP, the 2018 LTIP will continue to be comprised of a performance-based component that comprises 75%proposed pledge. The Office of the target opportunityChief Legal Officer is under no obligation to approve any request for pre-clearance and 25% that may become vested based on service-based conditions. In orderdetermine not to better alignpermit the pay opportunity witharrangement for any reason. Currently, there are no outstanding pledges of the Company’s near-term and longer-term objectives post-Merger, the Compensation Committee has made modest adjustments to the metrics that will determine future pay results. The key design parameters forsecurities by our President and Chief Executive Officer’s 2018 AIP and LTIP are provided below.directors.

LOGO

LOGO

Merger-Related 2018 Bonus RSU AwardsStock Ownership Policy

In February 2018, in recognition of the Merger, Messrs. Tuomi, Freedman and Tanner were awarded 34,231, 18,257 and 18,257 RSUs, respectively (the “2018 Bonus RSUs”). The 2018 Bonus RSUs will generally vest in equal annual installments onWe have adopted a stock ownership policy under which each of the first three anniversaries of March 1, 2018, subject to the executive’s continued employment

2018 Proxy Statement42


Executive Compensation(continued)

through the applicable vesting date. If the executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than as described below, all unvested 2018 Bonus RSUs will be forfeited. The other terms of the 2018 Bonus RSUs, including the terms related to dividends or dividend equivalent payments, as applicable, restrictive covenants and clawback are substantially the same as with those applicable to the LTIP Time RSUs.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by each of ourCompany’s NEOs and that remained unvested as of December 31, 2017.

Effective witheach non-employee director serving on the consummation ofBoard who is eligible to receive compensation for his or her service on the Merger, each outstanding common share of SWH converted into 1.6140Board or committee thereof is expected to own shares of our common stock (the “Exchange Ratio”)equal in market value to a specified multiple of his or her annual base salary or cash retainer, as applicable. Under this policy, our President and as partCEO is expected to own equity in an amount equal to six times his or her annual base salary, the other officers are required to own equity in an amount equal to three times his or her annual base salary and the compensated non-employee directors are required to own equity in an amount equal to five times his or her annual cash retainer for serving on the Board (exclusive of any cash payable for service on a committee of the termsBoard or as a chairperson of the Merger, we assumedBoard or committee of the outstanding time-vesting RSU awards previously granted by SWH wherebyBoard). The ownership requirement is expected to be satisfied within five years of the SWH award,date that the person becomes subject to the policy. In addition, the stock ownership policy provides that, until such person satisfies the ownership requirement, he or she is required to retain at least 50% of the equity such person holds that qualifies toward the ownership requirement and, once vested, will settle in sharesthe ownership requirement is met, the person must retain the requisite level of equity for so long as he or she is subject to the policy. As of the Record Date, all of our common stock (the “Assumed SWH Awards”). For Mr. Tuomi,directors and NEOs are in compliance with the amounts included and terms described below for the Assumed SWH Awards reflect (1) the number of shares subject to his SWH Awards after applying the Exchange Ratio and (2) the vesting and other terms of the Assumed SWH Awards, which remain as originally granted.Stock Ownership Policy.

       Stock Awards 

Name

 Award Grant Date  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested(1)(2)

(#)

  

Market Value

of Shares

or Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested(3)

($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not
Vested
(2)(4)

(#)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested(3)

($)

 

Frederick C. Tuomi(5)

 Assumed SWH Award  03/16/2016   149,259  $3,518,035       
 Assumed SWH Award  02/02/2017   91,965  $2,167,615       
 Sign-On RSU Award  11/16/2017   150,927  $3,557,349       

John B. Bartling Jr.(6)

 2017 LTIP Award  06/23/2017   36,205  $853,352   104,684  $2,467,402 

Ernest M. Freedman

 Supplemental Bonus Award  02/01/2017   52,584  $1,239,405       
 2017 LTIP Award  06/23/2017   42,241  $995,620   124,150  $2,926,216 
 Retention Award  06/23/2017   138,122  $3,255,536       

Dallas B. Tanner

 Supplemental Bonus Award  02/01/2017   67,548  $1,592,106       
 2017 LTIP Award  06/23/2017   42,241  $995,620   124,150  $2,926,216 
  Retention Award  06/23/2017   138,122  $3,255,536       

(1)The time-vesting RSUs are scheduled to vest as follows:

(a)Assumed SWH Awards: the award granted on March 16, 2016 vests in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the award granted on February 2, 2017 vests in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of March 1, 2017 subject in each case to Mr. Tuomi’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
(b)Sign-On RSUs Award: vests in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to Mr. Tuomi’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
(c)Supplemental Bonus Award: (i) as to Mr. Freedman, 80% of his Supplemental Bonus Award vested upon the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO, and the remaining 20% is scheduled to vest upon the occurrence of an exit event, dissolution or qualifying termination (each as described above under “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Supplemental Bonus Plan”); and (ii) as to Mr. Tanner, his Supplemental Bonus Award vests in three equal annual installments, with the first tranche vested on the February 6, 2017 completion of the IPO, and the second and third tranches vesting, respectively, on the first and second anniversaries thereafter. Vesting is, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(d)2017 LTIP Time RSUs: (i) Tranche 1 is scheduled to vest in full on the first anniversary of March 1, 2017; (ii) Tranche 2 is scheduled to vest in two equal installments on each of the first and second anniversaries of March 1, 2017; and (iii) Tranche 3 is scheduled to vest in equal annual installments on each of the first four anniversaries of March 1, 2017, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

432018 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation(continued)

(e)2017 LTIP PRSUs: As described in footnote (4) below, the performance period for the portion of the 2017 LTIP PRSUs subject to Tranche 1 ended on December 31, 2017 but remained subject to time-vesting conditions until the Certification Date. The amount reported under “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” reflect the number of shares earned based on actual achievement under the performance measures as of the end of the performance period. As of December 31, 2017, Messrs. Freedman and Tanner each earned 16,917 RSUs in respect of Tranche 1 of their 2017 LTIP PRSUs, which shares of our common stock were delivered in March 2018 following the Compensation Committee’s certification of performance.
(f)Retention Award: 50% of the award vests on the date that is 18 months from the closing date of the Merger, and 50% of the award vests in full on the fourth anniversary of the grant date subject, in each case, to the executive’s continued employment through that date.

(2)For additional information on vesting upon specified termination and change in control events, see “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”
(3)Amounts reported are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE as of December 29, 2017 ($23.57), the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(4)2017 LTIP PRSUs are earned in respect of a number of shares based on the achievement of Absolute TSR, Same Store NOI Growth CAGR and AFFO Growth CAGR at the end of specified performance periods and, thereafter, remain subject to time-vesting conditions until either the Certification Date (Tranche 1, Tranche 2 and 50% of Tranche 3) or a later vesting date (50% of Tranche 3 which vests on December 31, 2020), subject to the executive’s continued employment through the Certification Date or the later vesting date, as applicable. See “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards—Invitation Homes’ Long-Term Incentive Program.”

The number and market value of shares reported above reflect the portion of the 2017 LTIP PRSUs subject to Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 based on maximum performance of Absolute TSR, Same Store NOI Growth CAGR and AFFO Growth CAGR, as our achievement under these measures as of December 31, 2017 was between target and maximum. The actual number of shares that will be deliverable is not yet determinable.

The performance period for the portion of the 2017 LTIP PRSUs subject to Tranche 1 ended on December 31, 2017 but remained subject to time-vesting conditions until the Certification Date and are, therefore, reported under “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” and based on actual achievement under the performance measures as of the end of the performance period.

(5)The terms of the Performance-VestingSign-On RSUs were established and approved in 2018 and thereby granted in 2018 and are, therefore, not included in the table above.
(6)In connection with his termination of employment with the Company, all of Mr. Bartling’s equity awards under the Supplemental Bonus Plan vested, the next installment of 28,488 2017 LTIP Time RSUs that would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date following his departure vested and 78,256 2017 LTIP PRSUs, representing the prorated portion of his 2017 LTIP PRSUs, remained outstanding as of the employment termination date and are eligible to vest (which number of 2017 LTIP PRSUs may be higher or lower based on actual performance achieved during the originally scheduled performance period).

Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control

Severance Plan

In June 2017, we adopted the Severance Plana severance plan for employees of the Company at the level of Senior Vice President and above and selected by the Compensation Committee.and Management Development Committee (the “Severance Plan”). Each of our NEOs including Mr. Tuomi, participateparticipates in the Severance Plan. As a condition to becoming eligible for benefits under the Severance Plan, each participant must agree to terminate and cancel such other employment, severance protection or other individual prior agreementagreements relating to severance or termination benefits. As a result, each of Messrs. Bartling’s, Freedman’s and Tanner’s employment agreements were terminated, however, the covenants set forth in such employment agreements are incorporated into the Severance Plan for purposes of the covenants respectively applicable to such executives under the Severance Plan.

The Severance Plan provides for payment of severance and other benefits to eligible executives in the event of a termination of employment with us without cause or following a constructive termination (each as defined in the Severance Plan and each, a “qualifying termination”), or for a limited number of individuals, including our NEOs, the event of a termination with us as a result of death or disability (as such terms are defined in the Severance Plan), in each case, subject to the (i) executive’s execution andnon-revocation of a general release of claims in favor of the Company and (ii) continued compliance with the restrictive covenants related to post-employmentnon-solicitation andnon-competition for 12 months following any termination of employment and indefinite covenants covering trade secrets, confidentiality andnon-disparagement.

Retirement Benefits

We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) plan, under which we match each employee’s contributions dollar-for-dollar up to 3% of such employee’s eligible earnings, and we match 50% on the next 2% of each employee’s eligible earnings contributed. All of our matching contributions are fully vested, and each NEO was eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan in 2019.

572021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Employee Benefits

We provide a competitive benefits package to our associates. In early 2020, we rolled out two new benefits programs—flexible work arrangements and parental leave—as a direct result of our associate engagement survey. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in various benefit plans available generally to our associates. Under these plans, all associates are entitled to access to health, dental, vision, term life insurance and disability coverage. All associates, including our executive officers, are also eligible to receive vacation, sick leave and other paid holidays. We do not have ‘‘executive-only’’ benefits or perquisites.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, paid to or earned by our NEOs for services rendered to us during the fiscal years presented.

        

Name and Principal Position

YearsSalary
($)

  Bonus(1)  

($)

Stock
Awards
(2)
($)
Options  
Awards  
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)  
($)
All Other
Compensation
(4)  
($)

Total

($)

Dallas B. Tanner

(President and Chief Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$800,000

 

 

 

 

$272,293

 

 

 

 

 

$3,625,057

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   809,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  5,518,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$700,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,418,449

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,161,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  6,291,215

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$525,000

 

 

 

 

$221,267

 

 

 

 

 

$1,900,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   685,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  3,342,458

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$625,000

 

 

 

 

$  68,945

 

 

 

 

 

$1,700,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   655,469

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  3,060,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,229,721

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   894,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  4,760,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$600,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,900,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   814,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  3,325,916

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

(Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer)

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$575,000

 

 

 

 

$  77,265

 

 

 

 

 

$1,700,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   571,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,400

 

 

 

 

 

$  2,935,471

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$575,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,168,736

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   785,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  4,540,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$525,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,900,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   616,220

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,000

 

 

 

 

 

$  3,052,261

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

(Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer)

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$475,000

 

 

 

 

$  41,377

 

 

 

 

 

$   800,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   394,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,722,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,567,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   484,467

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  2,513,064

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$425,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   700,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   451,735

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$11,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,587,808

 

 

 

(1)

Bonus represents the discretionary portion of the annual cash incentive award.

(2)

Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards granted in 2020 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2020 Form 10-K.

The stock award values reflected in the table above for 2020 represent the grant date fair value in respect of the time vesting RSUs and performance vesting RSUs granted under our 2020 LTIP.

As described further under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Long-Term (Equity) Incentive Program,” of the 2020 LTIP performance vesting RSUs granted in 2020, 75% of the 2020 LTIP RSUs at target are based on performance, of which 45% are tied to the TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR (with a cap at target if the Company’s absolute TSR is negative) and 30% are tied to the Company’s Same Store NOI Growth CAGR. The grant date fair value of the RSUs that are earned based on the Same Store NOI Growth CAGR were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based up on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. Assuming the highest level of performance achievement, the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs that are earned based on Same Store NOI Growth CAGR would have been: Mr. Tanner—$2,175,050; Mr. Freedman—$1,020,034; Mr. Young—$1,020,034; and Mr. Solls—$480,048.

As the RSUs that are earned based on the TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR are subject to market conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and are not subject to performance conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718, they have no maximum grant date fair values that differ from the grant date fair values presented in the table.

(3)

Amounts shown for 2020 represent the annual cash incentive awards earned under our 2020 annual cash incentive program as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Compensation—2020 Annual Cash Incentive Program.”

(4)

All Other Compensation for 2020 represents Company-paid matching 401(k) plan contributions.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  4458   


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)   

 

 

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

    
          

 

Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
(1)

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(3)

  

All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or Units
(#)

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
(4)
($)

 

Name

 Grant Name Type Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
(2)
  

Target

($)

  

Max

($)

  Threshold
(#)
(2)
  Target
(#)
  

Max

(#)

 

Dallas B. Tanner

     

 

$

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,800,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Time Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Time

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,361

 

 

 

$

 

 

906,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Performance Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Performance   

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,811

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

2,718,781

 

 

 

 

Ernest M. Freedman

     

 

 

 

 

$39,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$781,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,171,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Time Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Time

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,238

 

 

 

$

 

 

425,004

 

 

 

 

  

 

2020 LTIP Performance Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,275,036

 

 

 

 

Charles D. Young

     

 

$

 

 

35,938

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

718,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,078,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Time Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Time

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,238

 

 

 

$

 

 

425,004

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Performance Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,275,036

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Solls

     

 

 

 

 

$23,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$712,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020 LTIP Time Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Time

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,701

 

 

 

$

 

 

200,025

 

 

 

 

  

 

2020 LTIP Performance Vesting RSUs

 

 

 

Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,455

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

600,029

 

 

 

 

(1)

Reflects the possible payouts of cash incentive compensation under the 2020 annual cash incentive program. The actual amounts paid are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” and described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Compensation—2020 Annual Cash Incentive Program” above.

(2)

Threshold reflects the payout associated with the minimum level of achievement that is greater than $0 or 0 RSUs.

(3)

Represents performance vesting RSUs granted as part of our 2020 LTIP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Compensation—2020 Long-Term (Equity) Incentive Program.”

(4)

Represents the grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2020 Form 10-K.

592021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and 2020 Grants of Plan- Based Awards Table

Employment Arrangements

We do not have employment agreements with any of our NEOs. In August 2017, in contemplation of the Merger, each of Messrs. Tanner, Freedman and Solls entered into a letter agreement with us which became effective on November 16, 2017, upon the consummation of the Merger (the “Letter Agreements”). The Letter Agreements were intended to provide these executives with specified benefits as the Merger did not constitute a “change in control” or an “exit event” as defined under any of our compensatory or benefit plans or arrangements, including the Omnibus Incentive Plan or the Severance Plan.

For information about payments and benefits to which Messrs. Tanner and Freedman may be entitled upon qualifying employment termination events or a change in control, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Benefits upon a Termination or Change in Control.”

2021 Proxy Statement60


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year End

       

 

Stock Awards

 
      

Name

 Award Grant Date  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(1)(2)
(#)
  

Market Value
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(3)

($)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(2)(4)(5)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(3)(4)(5)
($)
 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

2017 LTIP RSUs

 

 

6/23/2017

 

 

 

3,166

 

 

 

$       94,030

 

  
 

Retention RSUs

 

 

6/23/2017

 

 

 

69,061

 

 

 

$  2,051,112

 

  
 

2018 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

53,618

 

 

 

$  1,592,455

 

  
 

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

6,086

 

 

 

$     180,754

 

  
 

2019 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

16,455

 

 

 

$     488,714

 

 

 

134,534

 

 

 

$3,995,660

 

 

2019 Outperformance Plan Awards

 

 

5/1/2019

 

   

 

202,020

 

 

 

$6,000,000

 

  

2020 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

30,361

 

 

 

$     901,722

 

 

 

130,809

 

 

 

$3,885,027

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

2017 LTIP RSUs

 

 

6/23/2017

 

 

 

3,166

 

 

 

$       94,030

 

  
 

Retention RSUs

 

 

6/23/2017

 

 

 

69,061

 

 

 

$  2,051,112

 

  
 

2018 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

53,618

 

 

 

$  1,592,455

 

  
 

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

6,086

 

 

 

$     180,754

 

  
 

2019 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

11,702

 

 

 

$     347,549

 

 

 

  95,668

 

 

 

$2,841,340

 

 

2019 Outperformance Plan Awards

 

 

5/1/2019

 

   

 

151,831

 

 

 

$4,509,375

 

  

2020 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

14,238

 

 

 

$     422,869

 

 

 

  61,346

 

 

 

$1,821,976

 

Charles D. Young

 

2018 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

53,618

 

 

 

$  1,592,455

 

  
 

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

6,086

 

 

 

$     180,754

 

  
 

2019 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

11,702

 

 

 

$     347,549

 

 

 

  95,668

 

 

 

$2,841,340

 

 

2019 Outperformance Plan Awards

 

 

5/1/2019

 

   

 

146,149

 

 

 

$4,340,625

 

  

2020 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

14,238

 

 

 

$     422,869

 

 

 

  61,346

 

 

 

$1,821,976

 

Mark A. Solls

 

2017 LTIP RSUs

 

 

6/23/2017

 

 

 

1,152

 

 

 

$       34,214

 

  
 

2018 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

17,874

 

 

 

$     530,858

 

  
 

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

 

 

3/1/2018

 

 

 

3,043

 

 

 

$       90,377

 

  
 

2019 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

5,120

 

 

 

$     152,064

 

 

 

  41,856

 

 

 

$1,243,123

 

 

2019 Outperformance Plan Awards

 

 

5/1/2019

 

   

 

  80,808

 

 

 

$2,400,000

 

  

2020 LTIP RSUs

 

 

3/1/2020

 

 

 

6,701

 

 

 

$     199,020

 

 

 

  28,869

 

 

 

$   857,409

 

(1)

The time vesting RSUs are scheduled to vest as described below.

(a)

2017 LTIP time vesting RSUs: the final tranche vested on March 1, 2021.

(b)

Retention RSUs: the outstanding awards are scheduled to vest on June 19, 2021.

(c)

2018 LTIP time vesting RSUs: the outstanding awards vested on March 1, 2021.

(d)

2018 LTIP performance vesting RSUs: the performance period ended on December 31, 2020, but the awards remain subject to time vesting conditions. The amounts reported under “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” reflect the number of RSUs earned based on actual achievement under the performance measures as of the end of the applicable performance period. These awards vested upon the Certification Date and were issues, as shares of our common stock, net of tax, in February 2021.

(e)

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award RSUs: the outstanding awards vested on March 1, 2021.

(f)

2019 LTIP time vesting RSUs: the award is scheduled to vest or vested in equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date of March 1, 2019.

(g)

2020 LTIP time vesting RSUs: the award is scheduled to vest in equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date of March 1, 2020.

612021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

(2)

For additional information on vesting upon specified termination and change in control events, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”

(3)

Amounts reported are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020.

(4)

2019 LTIP performance vesting RSUs are earned in respect of a number of shares based on the achievement of the TSR Relative to the RMS Index CAGR and Same Store NOI Growth CAGR at the end of a specified performance period on December 31, 2021 and, thereafter, remain subject to time vesting conditions until the Certification Date. The number and market value of shares reported above reflect the portion of the 2019 LTIP performance vesting RSUs based on maximum performance of the TSR Relative to the RMS Index CAGR and maximum performance on Same Store NOI Growth CAGR, as our achievement under these measures as of December 31, 2020 was maximum and above target, respectively. The actual number of shares that will be deliverable is not yet determinable.

2020 LTIP performance vesting RSUs are earned in respect of a number of shares based on the achievement of the TSR Relative to the RMS Index CAGR and Same Store NOI Growth CAGR at the end of a specified performance period on December 31, 2022 and, thereafter, remain subject to time vesting conditions until the Certification Date. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Long-Term (Equity) Incentive Program.” The number and market value of shares reported above reflect the portion of the 2020 LTIP performance vesting RSUs based on maximum performance of the TSR Relative to the RMS Index CAGR and target performance on Same Store NOI Growth CAGR, as our achievement under these measures as of December 31, 2020 was above target and between threshold and target, respectively. The actual number of shares that will be deliverable is not yet determinable.

Outperformance Program awards are scheduled to vest 50% on March 31, 2022, and 25% on each of the first and second anniversaries of such date.

(5)

Outperformance Program awards were calculated using the share price as of December 31, 2020 of $29.70. The amounts reflected in the table are based on maximum performance as our achievement under both the cumulative TSR and TSR relative to the FTSE Nareit Residential Index measures was above the minimum amount as of December 31, 2020.

2020 Stock Vested Table

 

Name

 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(1)
(#)
 Value Realized on
Vesting
(2)
($)

Dallas B. Tanner

 

75,204

 

$2,254,095

Ernest M. Freedman

 

72,827

 

$2,185,899

Charles D. Young

 

53,466

 

$1,334,673

Mark A. Solls

 

27,571

 

$   826,092

(1)

Represents shares acquired on the vesting of RSUs in 2020 as follows:

(a)

As to Mr. Tanner, 3,166 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 5,705 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 6,086 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 Supplemental Bonus Award on March 1, 2020, 8,227 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2019 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020 and 52,020 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP performance vesting RSUs of which half vested on February 21, 2020 and half vested on December 31, 2020.

(b)

As to Mr. Freedman, 3,166 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 5,705 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 6,086 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 Supplemental Bonus Award on March 1, 2020, 5,850 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2019 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020 and 52,020 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP performance vesting RSUs of which half vested on February 21, 2020 and half vested on December 31, 2020.

(c)

As to Mr. Young, 5,705 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 6,086 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 Supplemental Bonus Award on March 1, 2020, 5,850 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2019 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 10,948 shares acquired on the vesting of his SWH awards assumed in the Merger on March 1, 2020, and 24,877 shares acquired on the vesting of his SWH awards assumed in the Merger on March 16, 2020.

(d)

As to Mr. Solls, 1,151 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 1,902 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020, 3,043 shares acquired on vesting of his 2018 Supplemental Bonus Award on March 1, 2020, 2,559 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2019 LTIP time vesting RSUs on March 1, 2020 and 18,916 shares acquired on the vesting of a portion of his 2017 LTIP performance vesting RSUs of which half vested on February 21, 2020 and half vested on December 31, 2020.

(2)

Amounts reported are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the vesting date. If vesting occurs on a day on which the NYSE is closed, the value realized on vesting is based on the on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the last trading day prior to the vesting date. Amounts reported are shown before tax.

2021 Proxy Statement62


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Potential Benefits upon a Termination or Change in Control

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits that would have been payable to our NEOs under existing plans, assuming (1) a qualifying termination of employment, (2) a change in control, (3) a qualifying termination within 24 months of a change in control, or (4) death or disability occurred, in each case, on December 31, 2020.

Because the disclosures in the table assume the occurrence of a termination or change in control as of a particular date and under a particular set of circumstances and therefore make a number of important assumptions, the actual amount to be paid to each of our NEOs upon a termination or change in control may vary significantly from the amounts included herein.

     

Name

 Qualifying
Termination
($)
Change in
Control
($)

Qualifying Termination
Within 24 Months of
Change in Control

($)

Death or
Disability
($)

Dallas B. Tanner

Severance(1)

$

4,000,000

 

$

6,000,000

 

Bonus(2)

$

1,081,561

 

$

1,081,561

$

1,081,561

Time Vesting RSUs(3)

$

3,040,270

$

3,885,800

$

3,885,800

$

3,885,800

Performance Vesting RSUs(3)(4)

$

6,886,272

$

7,454,552

$

12,886,563

$

6,886,272

Continuation of Benefits(5)

$

24,043

 

$

36,064

 

Other Benefits(6)

$

46,154

 

$

46,154

 

Total

$

15,078,300

$

11,340,352

$

23,936,142

$

11,853,633

Ernest M. Freedman

Severance(1)

$

2,109,375

 

$

3,164,063

 

Bonus(2)

$

724,414

 

$

724,414

$

724,414

Time Vesting RSUs(3)

$

2,810,095

$

3,265,782

$

3,265,782

$

3,265,782

Performance Vesting RSUs(3)(4)

$

5,389,689

$

5,653,276

$

9,283,953

$

5,389,689

Continuation of Benefits(5)

$

24,043

 

$

36,064

 

Other Benefits(6)

$

36,058

 

$

36,058

 

Total

$

11,093,674

$

8,919,058

$

16,510,334

$

9,379,885

Charles D. Young

Severance(1)

$

1,940,625

 

$

2,910,938

 

Bonus(2)

$

649,031

 

$

649,031

$

649,031

Time Vesting RSUs(3)

$

664,953

$

1,120,640

$

1,120,640

$

1,120,640

Performance Vesting RSUs(3)(4)

$

5,313,746

$

5,588,382

$

9,154,045

$

5,313,746

Continuation of Benefits(5)

$

18,227

 

$

27,340

 

Other Benefits(6)

$

33,173

 

$

33,173

 

Total

$

8,619,755

$

6,709,022

$

13,895,167

$

7,083,417

Mark A. Solls

Severance(1)

$

950,000

 

$

1,425,000

 

Bonus(2)

$

436,339

 

$

436,339

$

436,339

Time Vesting RSUs(3)

$

323,433

$

532,165

$

532,165

$

532,165

Performance Vesting RSUs(3)(4)

$

2,352,596

$

2,447,993

$

4,221,707

$

2,352,596

Continuation of Benefits(5)

$

16,667

 

$

16,667

 

Other Benefits(6)

$

27,404

 

$

27,404

 

Total

$

4,106,439

$

2,980,158

$

6,659,282

$

3,321,100

(1)

Severance represents a cash payment equal to the sum of the NEO’s (x) annual base salary and (y) annual cash incentive based on target performance times the multiplier applicable to such NEO, payable in equal monthly installments over the applicable severance period.

(2)

Under the Severance Plan, our NEOs are entitled to their annual cash incentive otherwise payable under the annual cash incentive program for the year in which the NEO’s termination occurred, pro-rated for days of service up to and including the termination date and based on actual performance for the year, payable concurrently with annual cash incentive payments to other employees under the applicable plan.

(3)

All share values are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020.

(4)

2018 LTIP calculated at actual achievement: 200% TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR; and 65% Same Store NOI Growth CAGR. 2019 LTIP calculated at achievement as of December 31, 2020: 200% TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR; and 150% Same Store NOI Growth CAGR. 2020 LTIP calculated at achievement as of December 31, 2020: 145.5% TSR Relative to RMS Index CAGR; and 60% Same Store NOI Growth CAGR. Outperformance Program calculated at achievement as of December 31, 2020: 100% Relative TSR Component; and 54% Absolute TSR Component.

(5)

Under the Severance Plan, NEOs are entitled to continuation of benefits. A cash payment in an amount equal to the total amount of the monthly COBRA insurance premiums for participation in the welfare benefit programs of the Company in which the NEO participated as of his or her termination date; amounts reflect 2020 rates.

(6)

Other Benefits includes payout of unused paid time off.

632021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Severance Plan

As discussed above, in June 2017, we adopted the Severance Plan for associates of the Company at the level of Senior Vice President and above and selected by the Compensation and Management Development Committee. Each of our NEOs participates in the Severance Plan. The Severance Plan provides for payment of severance and other benefits to eligible executives in the event of a termination of employment with us without cause or following a constructive termination (each as defined in the Severance Plan and each, a “qualifying termination”), or for a limited number of individuals, including our NEOs, the event of a termination with us as a result of death or disability (as such terms are defined in the Severance Plan), in each case, subject to the (i) executive’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims in favor of the Company and (ii) continued compliance with the restrictive covenants related to post-employment non-solicitation and non-competition for 12 months following any termination of employment and indefinite covenants covering trade secrets, confidentiality and non-disparagement.

In the event of a qualifying termination, in addition to specified accrued benefits, which the executive has earned but has not yet received and to which the executive is entitled, the Severance Plan provides for the following additional payments and benefits:

 

alump-sumpro-ratalump-sum pro-rata annual cash bonusincentive otherwise payable under the AIPannual cash incentive program for the year of termination based on actual performance;

 

a cash payment equal to the sum of the executive’s (x) annual base salary and (y) bonusannual cash incentive based on target performance (the “cash severance amount”) times the multiplier applicable to such executive (which is 2.0 for Mr. Tuomi andTanner, 1.5 for Messrs. Freedman and Tanner)Young and 1.0 for Mr. Solls), payable in equal monthly installments over the applicable severance period (which is 24 months for Mr. Tuomi andTanner, 18 months for Messrs. Freedman and Tanner)Young and 12 months for Mr. Solls); and

 

a cash payment in an amount equal to the total amount of monthly COBRA insurance premiums for continued participation in our welfare benefit programs, for a period of 12 months.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event such qualifying termination occurs during thetwo-year period following a change in control (as defined in the Severance Plan), in addition to specified accrued benefits, which the executive has earned but has not yet received and to which the executive is entitled, the Severance Plan provides for the following payments and benefits:

 

alump-sumpro-ratalump-sum pro-rata annual cash bonusincentive otherwise payable under the AIPannual cash incentive program for the year of termination based on actual performance;

 

alump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of the executive’s (x) annual base salary and (y) bonusannual cash incentive based on target performance (the “cash severance amount”) times the multiplier applicable to such executive (which is 3.0 for Mr. Tuomi andTanner, 2.25 for Messrs. Freedman and Tanner)Young and 1.5 for Mr. Solls); and

 

a cash payment in an amount equal to the total amount of monthly COBRA insurance premiums for continued participation in our welfare benefit programs, for a period of 18 months;months for Messrs. Tanner, Freedman and

any RSUs in respect of awards granted on or prior to February 6, 2017, which are unvested at the time of termination, shall vest Young and settle.12 months for Mr. Solls.

In the event of a termination of employment with us as a result of the NEO’s death or disability (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan), in addition to certain accrued obligations, which the NEO has earned and to which he is entitled, the Severance Plan provides for alump-sumpro-ratalump-sum pro-rata bonusannual cash incentive for the year of termination, calculated based on the greater of (i) target bonusannual cash incentive for the year of termination and (ii) the actual annual bonuscash incentive paid in respect of the year prior to the year of termination.

In addition, Mr. Tanner is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable relocation expenses consistent with our relocation policy then in effect if he experiences a qualifying involuntary termination prior to November 9, 2018, and Mr. Freedman is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable relocation expenses if his employment is terminated by us without cause following specified circumstances involving a sale or liquidation of the Company. Each such executiveMr. Freedman is also entitled to the payment of any taxes he incurs with these relocation reimbursements.

Retention RSUs

Pursuant to his Term Sheet,the terms of the Retention RSU award agreements, as modified by the Letter Agreements, if the NEO’s employment is earlier terminated by us without “cause” or by the executive upon ana “constructive termination” (each as defined in the applicable award agreement for the Retention RSUs), the Retention RSUs will vest on the termination date.

2021 Proxy Statement64


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

LTIP RSUs

Time Vesting LTIP RSUs

Upon a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the award agreement applicable to the 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 LTIP RSUs (collectively, the “LTIP RSUs”)) or, if the NEO resigns from employment following a “constructive termination” (as defined in the award agreement applicable to the LTIP RSUs) (together with a termination without cause, a “qualifying involuntary termination”), the next installment of time vesting LTIP RSUs that would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date will vest as of the date of termination. Time vesting LTIP RSUs that are eligible to vest upon a qualifying involuntary termination are subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company.

Upon a NEO’s death or a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company following the NEO’s “disability” (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan), any unvested time vesting LTIP RSUs will vest as of the date of termination. Time vesting LTIP RSUs will also continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule following the NEO’s “retirement” (as defined below) and will be subject to forfeiture if the NEO violates specified restrictive covenants agreed to with the Company and described below.

Upon a change in control, if the time vesting LTIP RSUs are assumed by the successor or acquiror and a qualifying involuntary termination occurs during the two-year period following a change in control, any then-unvested time vesting LTIP RSUs will vest. Upon a change in control, if the time vesting LTIP RSUs are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, any then-unvested time vesting LTIP RSUs will immediately vest.

For Messrs. Tanner, Freedman and Young, “retirement” is defined as a voluntary resignation of employment at such time that the NEO is at least 55 years old, the NEO has at least 10 years of continuous service and the sum of the NEO’s age and years of service equals at least 65, provided that the NEO has given at least six months’ prior notice of the NEO’s retirement. For Mr. Solls “retirement” is defined as a voluntary resignation of employment at such time that the NEO is at least 60 years old and the sum of the NEO’s age and years of service equals at least 65, provided that the NEO has given at least six months’ prior notice of the NEO’s retirement.

Performance Vesting LTIP RSUs

Performance vesting LTIP RSUs are earned on the Certification Date. These performance vesting LTIP RSUs will vest on the Certification Date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such Certification Date, except in the event of a qualifying involuntary termination as described below. Any unearned performance vesting LTIP RSUs will be forfeited without “cause,” Mr. Tuomi is entitledconsideration.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a qualifying involuntary termination prior to vestingthe last day of any equity grants awardedperformance period, a prorated portion of the performance vesting LTIP RSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance through the last day of the applicable performance period, based on the number of days during the applicable performance period that the NEO was employed. Any performance vesting LTIP RSUs that are earned based on actual performance will vest on, and settle as soon as practicable following, the applicable Certification Date. Upon a qualifying involuntary termination following the last day of any performance period but prior to the MergerCertification Date, any unearned and unvested performance vesting LTIP RSUs will vest on the applicable Certification Date based on actual performance as of the end of the performance period .Upon a qualifying involuntary termination following the Certification Date where such performance vesting LTIP RSUs are subject to continued service vesting conditions, such earned but unvested performance vesting LTIP RSUs will vest on the NEO’s termination date. Performance vesting LTIP RSUs that didare eligible to vest upon a qualifying involuntary termination are subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company.

Upon a NEO’s death or a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company following the NEO’s “disability,” with respect to performance vesting LTIP RSUs for which the applicable performance period has not been completed, a prorated portion of the Performance Vesting RSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance on the last day of the performance period, with such proration based on the number of days the NEO was employed during the performance period. Following the NEO’s “retirement,” a prorated number of performance vesting LTIP RSUs shall remain outstanding and eligible to become earned, based on the extent to which the performance conditions are satisfied following the completion of the performance period, with such proration based on the number of days the NEO was employed during the performance period.

652021 Proxy Statement


  Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Upon a change in control, the number of performance vesting LTIP RSUs that become earned will be calculated based on actual performance through the date of the change in control without proration. Any performance vesting LTIP RSUs will vest as to 50% of such earned performance vesting LTIP RSUs on the date of the change in control and, as to the remaining 50% on the first anniversary of the change in control (or, in each case, upon a qualifying involuntary termination that occurs within the two-year period following the change in control). If the awards are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, or are unable to be measured in a consistent manner, any earned performance vesting LTIP RSUs (including the performance vesting LTIP RSUs that become earned in connection with the Merger.

For information about the treatmentchange in control) will immediately vest as of the NEOs’change in control.

2018 Supplemental Bonus Award

In the event of a qualifying termination, subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of the Company’s standard form of release of claims, the next installment of Supplemental Bonus Award RSUs which could become vested in accordance with the award notice shall become vested and settled.

In the event the NEO’s employment or service with the Company is terminated by the Company following the NEO’s death or during the NEO’s disability, subject to the NEO’s or executor’s execution and non-revocation of the Company’s standard form of release of claims, the Supplemental Bonus Award RSUs shall become vested as of the termination date and settled as soon as practicable following the termination date.

In the event of a NEO’s retirement following written notice at least six months prior to the date of the NEO’s resignation, the Supplemental Bonus Award RSUs outstanding equity awardsshall remain outstanding and eligible to vest so long as no Restrictive Covenant Violation occurs, as determined by the Committee, or its designee, in its sole discretion, prior to the applicable vesting date.

2019 Outperformance Program Awards

Following calculation of the award value, a number of OP Units with a value equal to the award value (obtained using the closing price per share on specifiedthe date that is not later than 30 days following the last day of the applicable performance period (the “Determination Date”)) shall become earned OP Units, based on actual performance during the performance period. Any unearned OP Units shall be forfeited effective as of the last day of the performance period. 50% of the earned OP Units shall become vested on the Determination Date. An additional 25% of the earned OP Units shall become vested on the first anniversary of the last day of the performance period and the remaining 25% of the earned OP Units shall become vested on the second anniversary of the last day of the performance period, subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting date, except in the event of a qualifying involuntary termination eventsas described below.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a qualifying involuntary termination prior to the last day of any performance period, a prorated portion of the maximum award value will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance through the last day of the applicable performance period, based on the number of days the NEO was employed during the performance period. Any OP Units that become earned OP Units following the Determination Date based on the prorated award value shall become fully vested on the Determination Date.

Upon a NEO’s death or a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company following the NEO’s “disability,” with respect to OP Units for which the applicable performance period has not been completed, a prorated portion of the maximum award value will remain outstanding and eligible to be earned based on actual performance on the last day of the performance period, with such proration based on the number of days the NEO was employed during the performance period.

In the event of a NEO’s retirement prior to the end of the performance period, following written notice at least six months prior to the date of the NEO’s resignation, a prorated portion of the maximum award value will remain outstanding and eligible to be earned based on actual performance on the last day of the performance period. The proration would be based on the number of days the NEO was employed during the performance period. Any OP Units that become earned OP Units following the Determination Date shall remain outstanding and eligible to vest. In the event of a NEO’s retirement following the end of the performance period, with respect to any OP Units that have become earned OP Units prior to the termination date, such earned OP Units shall remain outstanding and eligible to vest.

2021 Proxy Statement66


Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Upon a change in control, see “Narrativethe award value will be calculated based on actual performance through the date of the change in control without proration. Earned OP Units shall become vested as to Summary Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Awards”50% as of the date of the change in control, and “Narrative50 on the first anniversary of the date of the change in control. In the event of a qualifying termination during the 12-month period immediately following a change in control, any unvested earned OP Units shall become vested as of the termination date. If the awards are not assumed by the successor or acquiror, or are unable to Summary Compensation Table—Mr. Tuomi’s Compensation.”be measured in a consistent manner, any earned OP Units (including the earned OP units that become earned in connection with the change in control) will immediately vest as of the change in control.

Covenants

Each NEO is subject to restrictive covenants set forth in the Severance Plan, including an indefinite confidentiality covenant and covenants regardingnon-competition andnon-solicitation of employees and current or prospective clients or customers, in each case, at all times during employment and for up to 12 months after termination of employment.

Mr. Bartling’s Separation Benefits

Pursuant to his Letter Agreement,Under the Severance Plan described above under “Potential Benefits Upon a Termination or Change in Control—Severance Plan” and theLTIP award agreements for his equity-based awards, Mr. Bartlingand our Outperformance Program, if there is a restrictive covenant violation or the executive grantee engages in a detrimental activity (as defined in the applicable award agreement) in the four-year period following the grant date, the executive will be required to pay the Company an amount equal to the after-tax proceeds received upon the sale or disposition of the equity award and any shares issued in respect thereof.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act, we are providing the following payments and benefitsinformation regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation for our principal executive officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our principal executive officer) (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). Our CEO Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in connectiona manner consistent with his separation fromItem 402(u).

We selected the Company:

a $1,069,236lump-sumpro-rata cash bonus representing his bonus otherwise payable under the 2017 AIPmedian associate based on actual performance;
the 1,148 associates employed by the Company as of December 31, 2019 (excluding Mr. Tanner, our President and CEO). In identifying our median associate, we calculated the annual total target cash compensation of each associate as of December 31, 2020. Annual total target cash compensation included base salary and target bonus and was calculated using internal human resources records. We believe this consistently applied compensation measure reasonably reflects annual compensation across our employee base. We did not apply cost-of-living adjustments as part of the calculation.

The 2020 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K for our CEO, which is the amount set forth in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table, was $5,518,018. The 2020 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K for our median associate was $60,289. Our CEO Pay Ratio was, therefore, 92 to 1.

 

   4567  20182021 Proxy Statement


    Executive Compensation(continued)

 

 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

a $5,400,000 cash severance payment representing the amount

The following table provides information as of three times the sumDecember 31, 2020, regarding shares of (1) his base salary and (2) bonus based on target performance (payable over 24 months instead of in alump-sum);

a $32,707 lump sum cash payment representing the total amount of monthly COBRA insurance premiums for participation in our welfare benefit programs for 18 months;

$115,385 for his accrued and unused vacation; and

the accelerated vesting his then-unvested 421,266 RSUscommon stock that may be issued under the Supplemental Bonus Award,Omnibus Incentive Plan and the next installment of 28,488 2017 LTIP Time RSUs that would have vested onColony Starwood Homes Equity Plan and the next scheduled vesting date following his departure vested and 78,256 2017 LTIP PRSUs, representing the prorated portion of his 2017 LTIP PRSUs, remained outstanding as of the employment termination date and are eligible to vest (which number of 2017 LTIP PRSUs may be higher or lower based on actual performance achieved during the originally scheduled performance period).
Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust Non-Executive Trustee Share Plan (the “SWH Equity Plans”):

The foregoing payments and benefits are contingent on Mr. Bartling’s continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described

 
  As of December 31, 2020 
   
  

Number of

Securities

to Be Issued

Upon

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants

and Rights(1)

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants

and Rights(2)

  

Number of

Securities

Remaining

Available for

Future

Issuance

Under Equity

Compensation
Plans
(3)

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Omnibus Incentive Plan

 

 

 

 

3,443,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,286,860

 

 

 

SWH Equity Plans(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

3,443,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

      —      

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,286,860

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
             

(1)

Includes shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the vesting of time vesting and performance vesting RSUs. The number of shares to be issued in respect of performance vesting RSUs has been calculated assuming maximum levels of performance will be achieved.

(2)

Because there is no exercise price associated with RSUs, no amounts are included above.

(3)

Excludes securities reflected in the Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights column above.

(4)

On November 16, 2017, in connection with the Merger, we assumed the SWH Equity Plans. As the SWH Equity Plans were previously approved by SWH’s stockholders before we assumed these plans, and as we will not make future grants or awards under these plans, they are listed as “approved by stockholders.” As such, 4,845,383 securities remaining available under the SWH Equity Plans have been excluded from the table above.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  4668   


  

 

 

OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of the Record Date held by (1) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (2) each of our directors, director nominees and named executive officersNEOs and (3) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each beneficial owner is 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201.

The percentages included in the following table are based on 520,364,636567,650,321 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Record Date.

 

  

Beneficial Owner

 

 

Number of Shares

of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned

 

 

Percentage of

Common Stock

Beneficially Owned 

 

  

Owners of More Than 5%

 

    
  

Blackstone(1)

 

   

 

219,945,349

 

 

   

 

42.27

 

%

 

  

The Vanguard Group(2)

 

   

 

47,708,024

 

 

   

 

9.17

 

%

 

  

Directors and Named Executive Officers

 

    
  

Bryce Blair(3)

 

   

 

214,734

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Richard D. Bronson(4)

 

   

 

27,960

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Kenneth A. Caplan(5)

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Michael D. Fascitelli(4)

 

   

 

37,880

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Robert G. Harper(5)

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Jeffrey E. Kelter(4)

 

   

 

44,184

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

John B. Rhea(3)

 

   

 

19,500

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Janice L. Sears(3)(6)

 

   

 

18,500

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

William J. Stein(5)

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Barry S. Sternlicht(4)

 

   

 

1,110,475

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Frederick C. Tuomi(4)

 

   

 

184,594

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

John B. Bartling Jr.(7)

 

    

 

671,515

 

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Ernest M. Freedman

 

   

 

154,586

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Dallas B. Tanner

 

   

 

156,457

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (15 persons)(8)

 

   

 

2,619,193

 

 

   

 

*

 

 

  

Beneficial Owner

 

Number of Shares

of Common Stock

Beneficially Owned

  

Percentage of

Common Stock

Beneficially Owned

 

Owners of More Than 5%

  

The Vanguard Group(1)

 

 

79,239,392

 

 

 

13.96%

 

Blackrock, Inc.(2)

 

 

46,310,336

 

 

 

  8.16%

 

Cohen & Steers, Inc.(3)

 

 

36,418,040

 

 

 

  6.42%

 

Directors, Director Nominees and NEOs

  

Bryce Blair(4)

 

 

     291,412

 

 

 

   *

 

Jana Cohen Barbe(4)

 

 

       14,806

 

 

 

   *

 

Richard D. Bronson(4)

 

 

       45,016

 

 

 

   *

 

Michael D. Fascitelli(4)

 

 

       54,936

 

 

 

   *

 

Jeffrey E. Kelter(4)

 

 

       61,240

 

 

 

   *

 

Joseph D. Margolis(4)

 

 

         5,869

 

 

 

   *

 

John B. Rhea(4)

 

 

       36,556

 

 

 

   *

 

J. Heidi Roizen(4)

 

 

         5,869

 

 

 

   *

 

Janice L. Sears(4)(5)

 

 

       35,556

 

 

 

   *

 

William J. Stein(4)

 

 

         5,869

 

 

 

   *

 

Dallas B. Tanner

 

 

     185,594

 

 

 

   *

 

Ernest M. Freedman

 

 

     286,634

 

 

 

   *

 

Charles D. Young

 

 

       83,425

 

 

 

   *

 

Mark A. Solls

 

 

     108,180

 

 

 

   *

 

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (14 persons)

 

 

  1,220,962

 

 

 

   *

 

 

*

Less than 1%.

(1)Amounts beneficially owned reflect 80,382,041 shares directly held by IH1 Holdco L.P., 43,797,131 shares directly held by IH PP Holdco L.P., 8,619,746 shares directly held byIH2-A Holdco L.P., 33,908,708 shares directly held by IH3 Holdco L.P., 19,938,109 shares directly held by IH4 Holdco L.P., 15,250,871 shares directly held by IH5 Holdco L.P. and 18,048,743 shares directly held by IH6 Holdco L.P.

The general partner of IH1 Holdco L.P. is IH1 Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH1 Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH1 Holdco GP LLC.

The general partner of Invitation Homes Parent L.P. is Invitation Homes GP Parent LLC. The sole member of Invitation Homes GP Parent LLC is THR Investor LLC. THR Investor LLC is owned by Blackstone Family Real Estate PartnershipVII-SMD L.P., Blackstone Real Estate HoldingsVII-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate HoldingsVII-NQ-ESC L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.F-NQ (AV) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.1-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.2-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.3-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.4-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.5-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.6-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.7-NQ L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.8-NQ L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Family Real Estate PartnershipVII-SMD L.P. is Blackstone Family GP L.L.C., which is, in turn, wholly owned by Blackstone’s senior managing directors and controlled by its founder, Stephen A. Schwarzman. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate HoldingsVII-NQ L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate HoldingsVII-NQ-ESC L.P. is BREPVII-NQSide-by-Side GP L.L.C. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.F-NQ (AV) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.1-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.2-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.3-NQ L.P., Blackstone

472018 Proxy Statement


  Ownership of Securitie(continued)

Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.4-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.5-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.6-NQ L.P., Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.7-NQ L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate PartnersVII.TE.8-NQ L.P. is Blackstone Real Estate AssociatesVII-NQ L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate AssociatesVII-NQ L.P. is BREAVII-NQ L.L.C. The managing member of BREAVII-NQ L.L.C. and the sole member of BREPVII-NQSide-by-Side GP L.L.C. is Blackstone Holdings II L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Holdings II L.P. is Blackstone Holdings I/II GP Inc. The sole shareholder of Blackstone Holdings I/II GP Inc. is The Blackstone Group L.P.

The general partner of IH PP Holdco L.P. is IH PP Holdco GP LLC. Preeminent Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH PP Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH PP Holdco GP LLC.

The general partner ofIH2-A Holdco L.P. isIH2-A Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes2-A L.P. is the sole limited partner ofIH2-A Holdco L.P. and the sole member ofIH2-A Holdco GP LLC. The general partner of Preeminent Parent L.P. and Invitation Homes2-A L.P. is Invitation Homes 2 GP LLC. The sole member of Invitation Homes 2 GP LLC is IH2 Investor L.P. The general partner of IH2 Investor L.P. is Blackstone Real Estate Associates VII L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate Associates VII L.P. is BREA VII L.L.C. The managing member of BREA VII L.L.C. is Blackstone Holdings III L.P.

The general partner of IH3 Holdco L.P. is IH3 Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes 3 Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH3 Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH3 Holdco GP LLC. The general partner of Invitation Homes 3 Parent L.P. is Invitation Homes 3 GP Parent LLC. Invitation Homes 3 GP Parent LLC is owned by BREP IH3 Holdings LLC and BTO IH3 Holdings L.P.

The general partner of IH4 Holdco L.P. is IH4 Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes 4 Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH4 Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH4 Holdco GP LLC. The general partner of Invitation Homes 4 Parent L.P. is Invitation Homes 4 GP Parent LLC. Invitation Homes 4 GP Parent LLC is owned by BREP IH4 Holdings LLC and BTO IH3 Holdings L.P.

The general partner of IH5 Holdco L.P. is IH5 Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes 5 Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH5 Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH5 Holdco GP LLC. The general partner of Invitation Homes 5 Parent L.P. is Invitation Homes 5 GP Parent LLC. The sole member of Invitation Homes 5 GP Parent LLC is BREP IH5 Holdings LLC.

The general partner of IH6 Holdco L.P. is IH6 Holdco GP LLC. Invitation Homes 6 Parent L.P. is the sole limited partner of IH6 Holdco L.P. and the sole member of IH6 Holdco GP LLC. The general partner of Invitation Homes 6 Parent L.P. is Invitation Homes 6 GP Parent LLC. The sole member of Invitation Homes 6 GP Parent LLC is BREP IH6 Holdings LLC.

The managing member of BREP IH3 Holdings LLC, BREP IH4 Holdings LLC, BREP IH5 Holdings LLC and BREP IH6 Holdings LLC, is Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII L.P. is Blackstone Real Estate Associates VII L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Real Estate Associates VII L.P. is BREA VII L.L.C. The managing member of BREA VII L.L.C. is Blackstone Holdings III L.P.

The general partner of BTO IH3 Holdings L.P. is BTO IH3 Manager L.L.C. The managing member of BTO IH3 Manager L.L.C. is BTOA L.L.C. The managing member of BTOA L.L.C. is Blackstone Holdings III L.P.

The general partner of Blackstone Holdings III L.P. is Blackstone Holdings III GP L.P. The general partner of Blackstone Holdings III GP L.P. is Blackstone Holdings III GP Management L.L.C. The sole member of Blackstone Holdings III GP Management L.L.C. is The Blackstone Group L.P. The general partner of Blackstone is Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. is wholly owned by Blackstone’s senior managing directors and controlled by its founder, Stephen A. Schwarzman.

Each of the Blackstone entities described in this footnote and Stephen A. Schwarzman (other than to the extent it or he directly holds securities as described herein) may be deemed to beneficially own the securities directly or indirectly controlled by such Blackstone entities or him, but each disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of each of Mr. Schwarzman and each of the other entities listed in this footnote is c/o The Blackstone Group L.P., 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

As of April 26, 2018, Blackstone entities have pledged, hypothecated or granted security interests in substantially all of the shares of our common stock held by them pursuant to a margin loan agreement with customary default provisions. In the event of a default under the margin loan agreement, the secured parties may foreclose upon any and all shares of our common stock pledged to them and may seek recourse against the borrower.

(2)As reported in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018,10, 2021, on behalf of The Vanguard Group and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., the Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 563,0320 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to 419,1611,763,628 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 47,075,65976,709,927 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 632,3652,529,465 shares of our common stock. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(2)

As reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2021, on behalf of BlackRock Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries identified therein, BlackRock Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 42,629,120 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect 0 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 46,310,336 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock. The address of BlackRock Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(3)

As reported in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021, Cohen & Steers, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 23,581,447 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 36,418,040 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock (including: Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.’s sole voting power with respect to 23,489,055 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to

692021 Proxy Statement


  Ownership of Securities (continued)

35,736,798 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock; and Cohen & Steers UK Limited’s sole voting power with respect to 92,392 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 681,242 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares of our common stock). Address of Principal Business Office for Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. is: 280 Park Avenue 10th Floor, New York, NY 10017. The principal address for Cohen & Steers UK Ltd. is: 50 Pall Mall 7th Floor London, United Kingdom SW1Y 5JH.
(4)

Includes 5,869 director RSUs scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 3, 2018 as follows: Mr. Blair—21,875; Mr. Rhea—19,500; and Ms. Sears—13,500.

(4)Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock after giving effect to the application of the Exchange Ratio in the Merger to common shares of SWH outstanding and common shares of SWH underlying the Assumed SFR Awards.March 23, 2021.

(5)Messrs. Caplan, Harper, and Stein are each employees of Blackstone, but each disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by Blackstone.
(6)Includes

For Ms. Sears, includes 5,000 shares of our common stock held by a trust for the benefit of Ms. Sears’ family, for which she serves as trustee.

(7)Mr. Bartling beneficially owned 671,515 shares of our common stock as of the date of his termination.
(8)As Mr. Bartling was not an executive officer at the timing of the filing of this Proxy Statement, shares of our common stock he beneficially owned as of the Record Date are not included.

 

20182021 Proxy Statement  4870   


 

  

 

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive officers and directors, a company’s chief accounting officer and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a company’s common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors, the chief accounting officer and beneficial owners with more than 10% of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of copies of such reports and written representations from our executive officers directors and Blackstone,directors, we believe that our executive officers, directors and Blackstonebeneficial owners with more than 10% of our common stock filed all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on a timely basis.basis, except for one late report on Form 4 for Mr. Solls, reporting shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Stockholders Agreement

In connection with our IPO, we entered into a stockholders agreement with Blackstone (the “Prior Stockholders Agreement”), which agreement was amended and restated in connection with the Merger (as amended and restated, the “Stockholders Agreement”). Like the Prior Stockholders Agreement, the Stockholders Agreement requires us to nominate a number of individuals designated by Blackstone for election as our directors at any meeting of our stockholders (each a “Majority Designee”) such that, following the election of any directors and taking into account any director continuing to serve as such without the need forre-election, the number of Majority Designees serving as our directors will be equal to: (1) if Blackstone collectively beneficially owns at least 30% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, three; (2) if Blackstone collectively beneficially owns at least 20% (but less than 30%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock, two; and (3) if Blackstone collectively beneficially own at least 5% (but less than 20%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock, one.

For so long as the Stockholders Agreement remains in effect, the Majority Designees may not be removed without the consent of Blackstone. In the case of a vacancy created by the removal or resignation of a Majority Designee, the Stockholders Agreement requires our Board to nominate an individual designated by Blackstone for election to fill the vacancy.

During the term of the Stockholders Agreement, Blackstone agreed to vote their shares of our common stock in favor of all persons nominated to serve as our directors by our Board (that otherwise complies with the Stockholders Agreement), except to the extent Blackstone reasonably determines that the election of any such director would reasonably be expected to cause reputational damage to the Company.

The Stockholders Agreement will remain in effect until the earlier of: (i) such time as Blackstone is no longer entitled to nominate a Majority Designee pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement and (ii) such time as Blackstone beneficially owns 10% or less of our common stock and Blackstone irrevocably waives its right to designate any Majority Designee under the Stockholders Agreement.

Registration Rights AgreementsAgreement

In connection with our IPO, we entered into a registration rights agreement that provides Blackstone an unlimited number of “demand” registrations and customary “piggyback” registration rights. The registration rights agreement also provides that we will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and indemnify the registration rights holders against (or make contributions in respect of) certain liabilities which may arise under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

In October 2016, SWH, Starwood Capital Group Global, L.P. (“Starwood Capital”) and certain other parties entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement (the “SWH Registration Rights Agreement”) and, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we entered into an assignment and assumption agreement whereby we assumed,

492018 Proxy Statement


  Transactions with Related Persons(continued)

all rights, interests and obligations, under the SWH Registration Rights Agreement. Pursuant to the SWH Registration Rights Agreement, Starwood Capital will have certain rights to demand a registration of some or all of its shares of our common stock and customary “piggyback” registration rights.

Indemnification Agreements

Our directors and executive officers are parties to indemnification agreements. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Maryland law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Loan to Former Director

In May 2014, we made a loan to Mr. Nicholas C. Gould (a member of our Board during January 2017), pursuant to a promissory note in the principal amount of $7.5 million. The note accrued interest at a rate of 1.97% per annum, which was added to principal on each anniversary of the issue date and was secured by equity interests held by Mr. Gould in Invitation Homes L.P. On January 5, 2017, the note with an outstanding balance, including capitalized interest, of approximately $7.7  million was canceled.

Directed Share Program

In connection with our IPO, we reserved shares of our common stock for purchase by our directors, officers, employees and related persons at the IPO price of $20.00 per share as part of a directed share program. Mr. G. Irwin Gordon (an executive officer during 2017), purchased 10,000 shares for $0.2 million under the directed share program, and Mr. Maurice Tanner (a parent of Mr. Dallas Tanner), purchased 105,000 shares for $2.1 million under the directed share program.

Other Relationships

Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P., an affiliate of Blackstone, served as an underwriter in our IPO and received aggregate fees of approximately $4.0 million in connection therewith.

Related Person Transaction Policy

Our Board recognizes the fact that transactions with related persons present a heightened risk of conflicts of interests and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof). Our Board has adopted a written policy regarding transactions with related persons. Our related person policy requires that a “related person” (as defined as in Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K) must promptly disclose to the Office of our Chief Legal Officer any “related person transaction��transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The Office of the Chief Legal Officer will then promptly communicate that information to the Board, its Audit Committee or such other committee of the Board designeddesignated by the Board to approve or ratify the related person transaction. Each related person transaction shall either be approved or ratified by our Board or a duly authorized committee thereof.thereof, taking into consideration such relevant facts and circumstances as it shall deem appropriate, which may include: the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the material terms of the transaction; the importance of the transaction both to the Company and to the related person; whether the transaction would likely impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in the best interest of the Company; and whether the value and the terms of the transaction are substantially similar as compared to those of similar transactions previously entered into by the Company with non-related persons, if any. The Board or duly authorized committee shall also consider whether any such transaction involving a non-employee director or nominee for director would compromise such director’s status as an independent director under the rules of the NYSE or the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, as a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act if such director serves on our Compensation and Management Development Committee or as an independent director under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act if such director serves on our Audit Committee. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote on a related person transaction in which they have an interest.

 

7120182021 Proxy Statement50


 

  

 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20192022 ANNUAL MEETING

If any stockholder wishes to propose a matter for consideration at our 20192022 Annual Meeting, the proposal should be mailed by certified mail return receipt requested, to our Corporate Secretary, Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201. To be eligible under the SEC’s stockholder proposal rule (Rule14a-8(e) of the Exchange Act) for inclusion in our 20192022 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement and form of proxy, a proposal must be received by our Secretary on or before December 28, 2018.7, 2021. Failure to deliver a proposal in accordance with this procedure may result in it not being deemed timely received.

In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate candidates for director and present other business for consideration at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. To make a director nomination or present other business for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders to be held in 2019, youa stockholder must submit a timely notice in accordance with the procedures described in our Bylaws. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of our Company not earlier than the 150th day norand not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Therefore, to be presented at our 2022 Annual Meeting, to be held in 2019, such a proposal must be received on or after November 28, 2018,7, 2021, but not later than December 28, 2018.7, 2021. In the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, in order for notice by the stockholder to be timely, such notice must be so delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting, as originally convened, or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Any such proposal will be considered timely only if it is otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. The proxy solicited by the Board for the 20192022 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority to vote as the proxy holders deem advisable on such stockholder proposals that are considered untimely.

COMPANY DOCUMENTS

We make available, free of charge on our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. These filings are available on our website at www.invitationhomes.com under “About Us”—“Investors”—“SEC Filings.” Copies of our Proxy Statement, form of proxy and our Annual Report, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to stockholders upon written request addressed to the Office of the Corporate Secretary, Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201; telephone: (972) 421-3600.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or a single notice addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” provides cost savings for companies and helps the environment by conserving natural resources. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, or if your household is receiving multiple copies of these documents and you wish to request that future deliveries be limited to a single copy, please notify your broker. You can also request prompt delivery of a copy of this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary, Invitation Homes Inc., 1717 Main Street, Suite 2000, Dallas, Texas 75201.

2021 Proxy Statement72


OTHER BUSINESS

The Board does not know of any other matters to be brought before the meeting. If other matters are presented, the proxy holders have discretionary authority to vote all proxies in accordance with their best judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

Mark A. Solls

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

 

   5173  20182021 Proxy Statement


  Other Business(continued)

 

 

We make available, free of charge on our website, all of our filings that are made electronically with the SEC, including FormsANNEX A: 10-K,10-QNON-GAAP and8-K. To access these filings, go to our website (www.invh.com) and click on “SEC Filings” under “About us”—“Investors”—“SEC Filings”. Copies of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to stockholders upon written request addressed to:RECONCILIATIONS

Corporate Secretary

Reconciliation of Total Revenues to Same Store Total Revenues and Same Store Core Revenues, Full Year

 

(in thousands) (unaudited)

 
  
  FY 2020  FY 2019 

 

Total revenues (total portfolio)

 

 

$

 

1,822,828

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,764,685

 

 

 

Non-Same Store revenues

 

 

 

 

(162,879

 

 

 

 

 

(161,013

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Same Store revenues

  1,659,949   1,603,672 

Same Store resident recoveries

 

 

 

 

(79,834

 

 

 

 

 

(65,903

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Same Store Core revenues

 $1,580,115  $1,537,769 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
         

Invitation Homes Inc.

1717 Main Street,

Suite 2000

Dallas, Texas 75201

 

A-120182021 Proxy Statement52


INVITATION HOMES INC.

1717 MAIN STREET

SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 23, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 23, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, so that it is received by May 23, 2018.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E46933-P01348            KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

DETACH AND RETURN

LOGO


LOGO

INVITATION HOMES INC. 1717 MAIN STREET SUITE 2000 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INVH2021
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Mailed proxy cards must be received to later than May 17, 2021.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D42154-P48440 KEEP THIS PORTION ONLY

FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
INVITATION HOMES INC.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees in Proposal 1.
1. To elect director nominees:
For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual All All Except nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the excepted nominee(s) on the line below.
01) Michael D. Fascitelli 06) Joseph D. Margolis 02) Dallas B. Tanner 07) John B. Rhea 03) Jana Cohen Barbe 08) J. Heidi Roizen 04) Richard D. Bronson 09) Janice L. Sears 05) Jeffrey E. Kelter 10) William J. Stein
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3.
2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.
3. To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.
NOTE: To consider such other business as may properly come before the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
For Against Abstain
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

INVITATION HOMES INC.

For

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees in Proposal 1 and “FOR” Proposal 2:

1.Election of Directors
Nominees:
01) Bryce Blair07) Jeffrey E. Kelter
02) Frederick C. Tuomi08) John B. Rhea
03) Richard D. Bronson09) Janice L. Sears
04) Kenneth A. Caplan10) William J. Stein
05) Michael D. Fascitelli11) Barry S. Sternlicht
06) Rebert G. Harper
ForAgainstAbstain
2.Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

NOTE:In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

YesNo
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

`

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:


The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
D42155-P48440
INVITATION HOMES INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 18, 2021 4:00 p.m., Central Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Michael D. Fascitelli, Dallas B. Tanner, Ernest M. Freedman and Mark A. Solls, or any of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as presented on the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock of Invitation Homes Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Invitation Homes Inc. to be held on May 18, 2021 (the “Annual Meeting”) or any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.
This proxy card, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no such direction is made, but the card is signed, this proxy card will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, as indicated on the reverse side, and in the discretion of the proxies with respect to such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side

E46934-P01348

INVITATION HOMES INC.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 24, 2018 10:00 A.M. Central Time

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints Bryce Blair, Frederick C. Tuomi, Ernest M. Freedman and Mark A. Solls, or any of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as presented on the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock of Invitation Homes Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders of Invitation Homes Inc. to be held on May 24, 2018 (the “Annual Meeting”) or any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.

This proxy card, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no such direction is made, but the card is signed, this proxy card will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, as indicated on the reverse side, and in the discretion of the proxies with respect to such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side